cyberman
Full Member
- Joined
- May 26, 2010
- Messages
- 37,331
So Poch gets to keep an unhappy player and bench him for 12 months?
Great deal there.
Great deal there.
They really aren't - which is why partly how we've assembled a very valuable squad with an incredibly low net spend.
So Poch gets to keep an unhappy player and bench him for 12 months?
Great deal there.
So Poch gets to keep an unhappy player and bench him for 12 months?
Great deal there.
Pissing around in the transfer window until August 31st has cost Spurs points. That's a fact. A message that your manager is on record in relaying.
When you pick up more points than any other team from January to May - three years running - and you win sod all then you blame the start to the season. Levy and his juvenile business tactic has been to the detriment of Spurs for years. If and when your manager leaves that will become clear - again.
And sorry, but the wider commercial picture is not irrelevant. If next season is successful partly because we still have Toby and can play a back 3 formation, and if that leads for example to a lucrative stadium naming rights deal, then the gains from that will dwarf losing £15m (or whatever) because we didn't sell him this summer.
So Poch gets to keep an unhappy player and bench him for 12 months?
Great deal there.
He wouldn't be benched for 12 months. My bet is he'd play lots of games in a back 3. And meanwhile United would lose out on the best CB they could get, which weakens a rival.
So that's not a bad deal for Spurs, however much you'd like to paint it otherwise. The idea that Spurs are over a barrel on this is just wishful thinking - so United either pay up or move on. I doubt Levy is much bothered either way.
You didn't revert to a back 3 to accommodate him last year when he was fit so why would Poch do it now?He wouldn't be benched for 12 months. My bet is he'd play lots of games in a back 3. And meanwhile United would lose out on the best CB they could get, which weakens a rival.
So that's not a bad deal for Spurs, however much you'd like to paint it otherwise. The idea that Spurs are over a barrel on this is just wishful thinking - so United either pay up or move on. I doubt Levy is much bothered either way.
He wouldn't be benched for 12 months. My bet is he'd play lots of games in a back 3. And meanwhile United would lose out on the best CB they could get, which weakens a rival.
So that's not a bad deal for Spurs, however much you'd like to paint it otherwise. The idea that Spurs are over a barrel on this is just wishful thinking - so United either pay up or move on. I doubt Levy is much bothered either way.
You didn't revert to a back 3 to accommodate him last year when he was fit so why would Poch do it now?
Does Poch completely freeze him out if he thought Toby was staying next year? I honestly don't think so, it just doesn't make sense.
You can’t weaken a rival by not selling a player to said rival, that’s just illogical. You can of course, not strengthen them, but it’s not the same thing.
It’s nice you see Utd as a rival, but it’s not reciprocated.
Levy can do one then. Simple as that. Doesn't seem like much to discuss here.
Because at the 10th time of asking he finally got lucky with a manager? Spurs fans must be the only people who deify their chairman to this extent. Spurs have done well because they finally got their hands on a manager capable of building a team.What an ignorant post, simply mind boggling, if Levy has such a "juvenile business tactic" how has he the club in a position it is in, competing with clubs with much higher resources? Why should Levy be bullied by United, well within his right to hold firm, if Levy just sold him 99% of United fans would come out with the "Spurs are a selling club" its utter BS. If you don't want him move on to another target and stop crying about mean old Levy.
Haha, Spurs are going to be so weak next year without Martial, not to mention Pogba. You will never get better players than that, so if we don't sell them to you, we weaken you. See how that works?If they end up with an inferior CB instead, then the rival is less strong than it would otherwise have been. And if you don't sign Toby then that will be the outcome, because you won't get a better CB who is ready-made to come into your first XI.
As for Spurs not being a rival, that's just you blustering.
If they end up with an inferior CB instead, then the rival is less strong than it would otherwise have been. And if you don't sign Toby then that will be the outcome, because you won't get a better CB who is ready-made to come into your first XI.
As for Spurs not being a rival, that's just you blustering.
Haha, Spurs are going to be so weak next year without Martial, not to mention Pogba. You will never get better players than that, so if we don't sell them to you, we weaken you. See how that works?
Because at the 10th time of asking he finally got lucky with a manager? Spurs fans must be the only people who deify their chairman to this extent. Spurs have done well because they finally got their hands on a manager capable of building a team.
Spurs aren’t in the top four because of their manager? Tone down the aggression.Bollocks, if you believe that you know very little about the PL as a whole, when ENIC bought us from Sugar we were a mess of a club, both on and off the pitch. That improved once ENIC took over, there is really no arguing the matter unless you a WUM. Yes they have gotten some things wrong but overall the job they have done is remarkable.
Spurs aren’t in the top four because of their manager? Tone down the aggression.
Haha, Spurs are going to be so weak next year without Martial, not to mention Pogba. You will never get better players than that, so if we don't sell them to you, we weaken you. See how that works?
Who is to say we won’t get a better CB, he’s a good player, but he’s not world class. Admittedly most of the alternatives won’t have PL experience, so could be more of a risk, but he will be far from the only option.
Furthermore we all have budgets, and money can be spent elsewhere. CB is far from our biggest priority.
You don’t think starting your post with bollocks is a touch aggressive? Then calling me a WUM for pointing out Spurs are where they are because they finally have a good manager? No doubt they’re run better now but was Levy the reason for Spurs greatness when his business tactic to milk extra money for Berbatov left them with no time to get an adequate replacement or when he was going through managers like there was no tomorrow?What aggression? Poch has done a marvellous job no doubt but if you look at Tottenham before ENIC and Tottenham since they took over no one can deny what they have done for us. Jol done massive things for us also at the time, and Harry had a part to play also (in his own Harry way).
The difference? Your opinion here, based on your own logic, should be that Spurs became weaker when we didn't sell you Ronaldo. Or no, that is different because you wouldn't need him as you wasn't competing for trophies at the time.The difference is that we neither want nor need Pogba, and if Martial was signed he'd simply be competing for starting slot … whereas Toby would walk into your first XI.
Bollocks, if you believe that you know very little about the PL as a whole, when ENIC bought us from Sugar we were a mess of a club, both on and off the pitch. That improved once ENIC took over, there is really no arguing the matter unless you a WUM. Yes they have gotten some things wrong but overall the job they have done is remarkable.
What an ignorant post, simply mind boggling, if Levy has such a "juvenile business tactic" how has he the club in a position it is in, competing with clubs with much higher resources? Why should Levy be bullied by United, well within his right to hold firm, if Levy just sold him 99% of United fans would come out with the "Spurs are a selling club" its utter BS. If you don't want him move on to another target and stop crying about mean old Levy.
Quite so. And the biggest fruit of their stewardship so far - the best football stadium in the UK - is opening for business in around 3 months from now.
You don’t think starting your post with bollocks is a touch aggressive? Then calling me a WUM for pointing out Spurs are where they are because they finally have a good manager? No doubt they’re run better now but was Levy the reason for Spurs greatness when his business tactic to milk extra money for Berbatov left them with no time to get an adequate replacement or when he was going through managers like there was no tomorrow?
The difference? Your opinion here, based on your own logic, should be that Spurs became weaker when we didn't sell you Ronaldo. Or no, that is different because you wouldn't need him as you wasn't competing for trophies at the time.
Selling a 29 year old CB for 50 million when he will be gone for half that the following summer is not being bullied. Asking for 75 million is just unrealistic and no one is paying that.
The fact that Alderweireld does not want to stay at Spurs says more than you actually selling him.
Can you name even one realistically available CB who is better than Alderweireld?
Quite so. And the biggest fruit of their stewardship so far - the best football stadium in the UK - is opening for business in around 3 months from now.
Quite so. And the biggest fruit of their stewardship so far - the best football stadium in the UK - is opening for business in around 3 months from now.
We need to walk away, Levy is toxic to deal with. There are better value for money CB's out there, some with a higher ceiling of potential than Alderweireld.
£55 million is above and beyond what he is worth, Spurs can feck off.