cjj
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2017
- Messages
- 697
- Supports
- Spurs
I guess because he is english, still young, and under the right manager could be the best LB in the league. He has more talent/potential than say Robertson and a lot of other LB in the league. Just because he doesn't have what it takes to succeed at a club like United doesn't mean he should be worth less money than the likes of Stones etc.
The marked is crazy, if you expect us to give you Martial for Alderweireld you might as well expect to give us Kane if you ask about Shaw.
He has failed under van Gaal and Mourinho, who aren't inexperienced managers. For all intents and purposes, if you believe Mourinho he's a fat get with an attitude problem. Even Poch eluded to it in Balague's book.
I'd say he's exactly the same as Barkley - expiring contract, young and famed for potential, but attitude/injury issues.
God knows how anyone could value him at £50-70m, even in this market, even if he had a longer contract. He's a £20m player, tops.
That's unfair on Rossi who if not for his injuries had a very good career when fit.
I think that's just the same as Shaw in terms of injuries. But the main point was that some players are hyped up at 17/18, then for whatever reason they just don't make it. You can't continue to sell the same 18 year old at 22/23 when he's not lived up to that ability though.
The difference between this season gone's City and the one Pep had in his first season, though, is a sorted defence. That's pretty much what Alderweireld brings, especially statistically proven, so that's worth a lot of money to a team like United, potentially speaking.