Let me clarify, I like him as a player. He is top drawer, right up there. I think he will improve us no doubt, but I need help in understanding one thing:
Him and Rooney will be our first two strikers in the team, with Chicha and Wilson(at least as of now) as back up. Let's say we lose Rooney for a few games, in the big/tough games are we happy with Muller as our main striker up top? Does that seem like the jigsaw is completed?
We will spend 60m+ on a player to cover a position and yet be playing with chicha/wilson in our starting line-up. How does this make sense? If we did not have Mata and did not have extra CMs who could play as the CAM/no.10(like herrera and fellaini), then yes, Muller and another striker(with work rate like rooney, plus a back up for the striker) would have made a lot of sense. would have been perfect.
You don't say no to players like Muller, i know. But, when you need to break the bank and break the bayern resolve(which is not happening), for a player who is not actively looking to leave, you do that for a player who fits in your team perfectly. In this regard ADM was a good buy, cause we did need a winger with raw ability.
I think we will buy muller and yet not have balance in our squad and also lack strength in depth.
Lose Mata(which I don't want), Fellaini and then get Muller and a back-up striker. This will make sense.
If we are willing to pay a shit loads of money to bring a player like Muller from a club like bayern, then, we have a better shot at getting Lewandowski/Benzema/Cavani/Kane. I would rather have us look at that.