Cantonarightboot
New Member
Well you have used it prematurely twice (re Waytt and Cesaro).
No, he really hasn't. Wyatt has been outstanding in this feud. Forget about the booking, he has done a fantastic job with his gimmick and has even had the backing of the fans, despite being a HEEL. Cena's generic tactic of using another stars' gimmick and manipulating it in a way which buries him didn't work out. I think that says enough. At WrestleMania, Wyatt came out looking fantastic. At Extreme Rules, which was horribly booked, Wyatt's manipulative side was portrayed quite well.
The whole point of the feud IMO was to expose Cena, from Wyatt's point of view. Is he really about loyalty and respect? The way he set about doing it is what you should putting emphasis on. ALL of us knew that he wasn't going to win at Payback. There was no way, but because he lost that means he has been "buried"? That is far from the case, and WWE are high on him at the moment. He's going to come back and get an even bigger push very soon. Keep watching.
Well firstly, I didn't say that having Heyman makes him a huge star, but WWE have clearly identified him as a potential top talent. Whether he's in the top, top bracket is open to debate, as I don't think he possesses the mic skills required to be at the very top. The match he had with Sheamus was good, and even though he lost, he put on a solid performance. Losing in that manner, against one of Vince McMahon's favourites, isn't a bad thing at all.
Post-WrestleMania, Cesaro's character is what has changed, and that's what has gone against him. He has transformed into a coward heel. The changes I can think of: being a coward, walking weirdly as he comes out, and his theme music being changed to something that resembles the construction of a child. It doesn't matter if he has Heyman as manager talking about Lesnar. I think that's the plan - I see it as that transparent - and it will result in a match with Lesnar. If that isn't the case, then yeah of course, I agree with you. He's not, however, going down the same route as Ryback. It's been reported many times that Ryback is a danger to his opponents - he can't wrestle. There's no connection between the two, really - and Heyman being a former manager to Ryback doesn't link them in any way.
I appreciate the detailed response, I agree with some points and others not so much...
Just compare the shield with say the wyatts... The shield have gone over a number of top stars in recent months, more recently evolution. Each member of evolution has made the shield look like genuine stars, how? by giving them the win and putting them over and having a number of victories when it matters (PPV's). They now sit in the main event slot and have done since WM!
Compared that to Wyatt who sits around midcard to upper mid card since WM! Wyatt has done a tremendous job of promoting himself on the mic and really made the feud. He has shown he can hang there with the big players and is deserving of a shot at main eventing. Sadly he had the misfortune of being inthe feud with Cena, who never lies down for anyone. I'd say that is down to Vinnie Mac more so, he flat out refuses to let Cena lose. I've asked it previously, think about it if Wyatt actually won at Payback? Where would his standing be within the company? Main Event wouldn't it?
Instead Super Cena wins out to save the day...AGAIN! If Cena had lost as I have argued he should have then it wouldn't of really hurt Cena at all. His standing in the company in & out of the ring is untouchable now!
In short a loss for Wyatt is more damaging than a loss for Cena.
Edit:
Just one other thing, I'm not sure now where they go with Wyatt tbh. He may well go face and leave Harper & Rowan. Distinct possibility in the near future. The crowd is very much behind him and I'm not sure who he can feud with now, to keep him as a heel. Hence a win for him made more sense as well and he could of went on to feud with Bryan?
Last edited: