Thiago Alcantara | Signed for Bayern Munich

Status
Not open for further replies.
To add to what ole said, amateur gamblers view bookies as gamblers like themselves, just particularly clever. In reality they are not gamblers at all, their aim is to make a book that will result in profit whatever the outcome. They look for the most profitable markets, where they can take the biggest mark-up, but that's not gambling as such.
 
In dummy terms what the hell does all that mean.


Transfer markets by bookie's are 'joke markets' designed to generate interest and new accounts. They are not worth millions (or even hundreds) to bookie's and the employees making these markets are not 'keeping agents and people with inside knowledge sweet'. The only time you should pay any attention to them is after all the bookies have taken one down and don't put them back up. That would indicate that a transfer has been finalised. Otherwise ignore them
 
To add to what ole said, amateur gamblers view bookies as gamblers like themselves, just particularly clever. In reality they are not gamblers at all, their aim is to make a book that will result in profit whatever the outcome. They look for the most profitable markets, where they can take the biggest mark-up, but that's not gambling as such.

Not to be nitpicky 711, as you obviously have a better grasp than the majority. But bookies don't create books to make each selection result in profit. That's impossible. Take an Southampton vs Arsenal game at St.Mary's as an example. Arsenal would be around Evens or so, and 95% of bettors would back them. They would be in every accumulator etc. The bookie can't force people to back the draw or southampton, and they can't cut Arsenal's odds and lenghten Southampton's by much as that would result in the wrong odds and the smart gamblers would be all over it. Arsenal might be a loser for over half a million for a bookie in this example on a typical Saturday. So why do they allow this? They've calculated that Arsenal's true price is 11/10. So for every bet they take at Evens, they are making a decent 'margin' or 'mark-up' on those bets. So while Arsenal may win that day and the company loses half a million, over the course of a season, if they keep taking bets at Evens that's true price is 11/10, then the results will even out and they will make a massive profit from that margin.

Anyway, apologies for derailing the thread! Terrific young player and we really should make a strong play for him
 
Not to be nitpicky 711, as you obviously have a better grasp than the majority. But bookies don't create books to make each selection result in profit. That's impossible. Take an Southampton vs Arsenal game at St.Mary's as an example. Arsenal would be around Evens or so, and 95% of bettors would back them. They would be in every accumulator etc. The bookie can't force people to back the draw or southampton, and they can't cut Arsenal's odds and lenghten Southampton's by much as that would result in the wrong odds and the smart gamblers would be all over it. Arsenal might be a loser for over half a million for a bookie in this example on a typical Saturday. So why do they allow this? They've calculated that Arsenal's true price is 11/10. So for every bet they take at Evens, they are making a decent 'margin' or 'mark-up' on those bets. So while Arsenal may win that day and the company loses half a million, over the course of a season, if they keep taking bets at Evens that's true price is 11/10, then the results will even out and they will make a massive profit from that margin.

Anyway, apologies for derailing the thread! Terrific young player and we really should make a strong play for him

I don't disagree, but are you not describing fixed odds there, where the bookmaker has to take a view? and even then that view would be heavily slewed by previous betting in similar circumstances. The discussion was originally about transfer betting though, where the odds are changed regularly according to amounts laid.
 
Transfer markets by bookie's are 'joke markets' designed to generate interest and new accounts. They are not worth millions (or even hundreds) to bookie's and the employees making these markets are not 'keeping agents and people with inside knowledge sweet'. The only time you should pay any attention to them is after all the bookies have taken one down and don't put them back up. That would indicate that a transfer has been finalised. Otherwise ignore them

Absolute fecking nonsense. Millions upon millions is bet on where the top players will end up by the start of the next season every year.

You really think that transfers are such massive news in every back page from may to September and people don't put a few quid on it.

It's what keeps the football gamblers going in the off season.
 
Could someone quote the article? Filter at work won't let me access the page.


Here ya go
Today's edition of Catalan newspaper Sport has gone a bit transfer crazy. The front two pages are all about Barcelona wanting Fernando Torres and then they go on to fret about funds for a central defender, meaning their first choices of people like Thiago Silva and Mats Hummels are being replaced by players such as Daniel Agger, because they've spent so much on Neymar, with perhaps the full cost of that deal not truly known at this stage.
They need to raise funds and after talking of Barcelona's defensive woes, Sport go on to say that they are about to lose Thiago to an 'insisntant' Manchester United because the club have been careless on the technical side. There's anger that a situation has developed which could see the player leave for just €18m because of a clause in his contract. Sport don't seem to think the clause should have existed in the first place, and that once it was there then Barcelona should have made sure the terms were fulfilled, meaning he wouldn't be able to leave for such a cheap fee.
Thiago hasn't played the required number of games and such was Barcelona's La Liga dominace, they could have started him in nearly every match for the second half of the season with little worry, but he only got 15 league starts for the whole season and just one in the Champions League. Barcelona say that Manchester United will need to complete a deal by August 1st, or his buy-out clause will go up again to €90m and the club will resist any attempts to buy him.
None of this sounds like anything new, but the way they are reporting him as almost gone does. The English press caught up on the stories properly over the last few days but they've been in Spain for a few weeks now, Sport say that Barcelona stand to lose both Thiago and his brother Rafinha, who could be going to Celta Vigo. It's far more realistic than the Cesc Fabregas claims, with the Spain midfielder insisting he doesn't want to go and the club not wanting to sell him. They'd rather not sell Thiago either but due to the 'carelessness' of Barcelona with his contract, they may not have a choice in that.
Manchester United will need to add in midfield this summer and the capture of Thiago would be a welcome boost for Manchester United fans, who are still not sure what a future under David Moyes will look like. The signing of an exciting young attacking midfielder will certainly help to ease those doubts and it would be a nice scenario if the club were able to 'unveil' both men at the same time. Moyes is currently on holiday and doesn't officially start his job until July 1st, which is when he'll be presented at Old Trafford, that doesn't leave the club long to sort out a Thiago deal if they fancy wheeling him out at the same time.
 
This is De Gea all over again.
 
Knowing us, he'll issue a come and get me plea, contact us directly and we'll drag it on until eternity at which point his release clause will be scrapped and we'll never sign him.
 
Sport is reliable in the sense they print stuff that Barcelona don't mind seeing printed.

The thing no one seems to know is what Thiago is thinking. His dad is talking like he's doing a sales pitch for him, presumably with Thiago's blessing. But that could be just an attempt to get a reaction from Barca. The fact the, "not developing as expected," phrase has been uttered by unknown sources "close to the club" suggests he's got his answer, and unless Thiago himself is very determined to prove something by staying I think he'll decide it's time to leave.

To us? No idea. I don't know why we would be listed as frontrunners, except that he is the kind of player we need and we can probably convince him that he'll get the playing time he needs. Welcome to sunny Manchester on Sea. :cool:
 
Knowing us, he'll issue a come and get me plea, contact us directly and we'll drag it on until eternity at which point his release clause will be scrapped and we'll never sign him.
:lol:

It's hilarious how much pessimistic some of you are.
 
:lol:

It's hilarious how much pessimistic some of you are.

I'm optimistic these days when it comes to results, future success or development of our players, I'll happily admit I expect us to challenge for the title and Champions League trophy next season, I expect Welbeck to become a good striker etc. I'm even optimistic when it comes to some transfer targets, when it comes to midfielders though it changes - I simply can't believe that we are ever going to sign one. I've been on this for 2 or 3 years in a row and I've been called all sorts of names for saying that we wouldn't sign one in 2011 and 2012, I'm still on that wagon.
 
I'd be delighted with this signing and hope we can pull if off. It wouldn't solve the main midfield issue we have though which is cover/competition/replacement for Carrick.

Thiago + Strootman, Fellaini or A.N.Other of that ilk this Summer and I'd be delighted.
 
I simply can't believe that we are ever going to sign one. I've been on this for 2 or 3 years in a row and I've been called all sorts of names for saying that we wouldn't sign one in 2011 and 2012, I'm still on that wagon.

It is an absurd position to take. I would bet my house that we sign at least one this window.
 
Sport is reliable in the sense they print stuff that Barcelona don't mind seeing printed.

The thing no one seems to know is what Thiago is thinking. His dad is talking like he's doing a sales pitch for him, presumably with Thiago's blessing. But that could be just an attempt to get a reaction from Barca. The fact the, "not developing as expected," phrase has been uttered by unknown sources "close to the club" suggests he's got his answer, and unless Thiago himself is very determined to prove something by staying I think he'll decide it's time to leave.

To us? No idea. I don't know why we would be listed as frontrunners, except that he is the kind of player we need and we can probably convince him that he'll get the playing time he needs. Welcome to sunny Manchester on Sea. :cool:

Get with the program.. We are front runners because we have been chasing this kid for 2 years!!! There not picking our name out the hat, we made a bid for him last year.
 
Absolute fecking nonsense. Millions upon millions is bet on where the top players will end up by the start of the next season every year.

You really think that transfers are such massive news in every back page from may to September and people don't put a few quid on it.

It's what keeps the football gamblers going in the off season.

Oh my lord you really have no idea on this. Millions and millions! That's hilarious.

Every single important market in the world of gambling has a Betfair exchange on it. On the Betfair exchange you can see precisely how much is turned over on the market. At this point in time, there are 8 or so betfair markets on transfer specials. http://www.betfair.com/exchange/football/event?id=26931956

They aren't even 'to the next club' markets as they aren't deemed important enough to create a market. They are just 'stay or go' markets. And the highest turnover on any of those markets so far? 28k on Suarez to leave or stay. Seriously, don't post about gambling if you haven't an utter clue about the business. I still can't get over this line from you, ''Transfer betting is worth millions to the bookies so you can be sure they'll be keeping agents and people with inside knowledge sweet with any information that can give them an edge.''. Got a great laugh from a couple of lads in the office on that one
 

Sorry wrong choice of word 'inquiry'. Apparently we inquired about him got told he wasn't for sale but our staff believed that Fabregas would stunt his development and he would be where he is now. Not sure if thats a positive or negative for us. Considering we had him down as not improving as a player.
 
I don't understand. Was this before Thiago signed a new contract with the release clause? Only way that makes sense to me. How could he not be for sale if he has a release clause?
 
I don't understand. Was this before Thiago signed a new contract with the release clause? Only way that makes sense to me. How could he not be for sale if he has a release clause?
It was only activated two weeks ago because he didn't play in 60% of Barca games this season.
 
It was only activated two weeks ago because he didn't play in 60% of Barca games this season.
No. I'm speaking about an incident prior to the one you are talking about. The one where Mainoldo said we inquired about Thiago but Barca said he was not for sale. If he has a release clause, Barca saying he is not for sale is irrelevant.
 
No. I'm speaking about an incident prior to the one you are talking about. The one where Mainoldo said we inquired about Thiago but Barca said he was not for sale. If he has a release clause, Barca saying he is not for sale is irrelevant.

He meant last year, right? Because he didn't have a clause last year. He didn't even have it last month.
 
No. I'm speaking about an incident prior to the one you are talking about. The one where Mainoldo said we inquired about Thiago but Barca said he was not for sale. If he has a release clause, Barca saying he is not for sale is irrelevant.

We were allegedly interested in him last summer. On approaching Barcelona, they wanted a buy back clause, which we had no interest in pursuing.
 
Oh my lord you really have no idea on this. Millions and millions! That's hilarious.

Every single important market in the world of gambling has a Betfair exchange on it. On the Betfair exchange you can see precisely how much is turned over on the market. At this point in time, there are 8 or so betfair markets on transfer specials. http://www.betfair.com/exchange/football/event?id=26931956

They aren't even 'to the next club' markets as they aren't deemed important enough to create a market. They are just 'stay or go' markets. And the highest turnover on any of those markets so far? 28k on Suarez to leave or stay. Seriously, don't post about gambling if you haven't an utter clue about the business. I still can't get over this line from you, ''Transfer betting is worth millions to the bookies so you can be sure they'll be keeping agents and people with inside knowledge sweet with any information that can give them an edge.''. Got a great laugh from a couple of lads in the office on that one

This man speaks sense, the transfer market is worth feck all to bookies and I doubt they have any sort of connections with agents at all. A good agent makes more money from a single transfer than all bookies put together make from the transfer market during the Summer, they'd have no reason to be in touch with them at all. People don't put much money on where players are going to end up, when someone does (usually without knowledge about the deal but no one can be sure) they shorten the odds to prevent a significant loss, that's all. That's why Ribery to Liverpool was once at evens.
 
Blimey. Maybe I need to review the meaning of release clauses. Isn't there a difference between having a release clause and activating a release clause?

It doesn't make sense to me that Thiago didn't have a release clause last month.
 
Blimey. Maybe I need to review the meaning of release clauses. Isn't there a difference between having a release clause and activating a release clause?

Well yeah, activating the release clause means you've triggered it with the sufficient bid.
 
He did have it last month, it was 90m it's the 60% of games clause that brings it down.

Whether his release clause is met or not, it depends on whether the player wants to go or not.

Don't all Spanish players have a release clause? So what you are saying is that all Spanish players are for sale..
 
Blimey. Maybe I need to review the meaning of release clauses. Isn't there a difference between having a release clause and activating a release clause?

His contract had a clause that said that if he doesn't play in at least 60% of all Barcelona games in a season he can go as long as someone offers €18m and he agrees to move. He played in less than a half of their games which activated the clause. Had he played in a few more games (I think six or seven) there'd be no option to buy him for €18m.
 
He did have it last month, it was 90m it's the 60% of games clause that brings it down.

Whether his release clause is met or not, it depends on whether the player wants to go or not.

Don't all Spanish players have a release clause? So what you are saying is that all Spanish players are for sale..
It's obligatory in Spain to put a release clause into player's contract for law reasons.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.