Brwned
Have you ever been in love before?
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2008
- Messages
- 50,937
Would you be uncomfortable having Fábregas alongside Carrick? I don't see how it's any more porous than Carrick-Scholes.
You seem to be ignoring the point that Barcelona play a relatively unique system in which they can play attacking midfielders (Iniesta and Deco) in their midfield trio. Deco was named Uefa Footballer of the Year and came 2nd in the Ballon d'Or largely off the back of his performances ahead of the midfield for Porto.
I am not ignoring it at all. Just that I found strange that one of the best player of last decade who hasn't played as an attacking midfielder by some people (you included) is called an attacking midfielder and believed that he would been played in the hole for other teams. I don't agree with that, and I think that he's better as a central midfielder (good at pressure, excellent at passing) than as a No. 10 when he isn't as good at scoring. You mentioned Bayern, I believe that Iniesta could have easily be Bayern's best player, he isn't a better attacking midfielder than Muller.
Yeah, I definitely don't share those concerns, and I've watched a fair bit of him. His ball retention is brilliant and would only ever be criticised in a team where possession is as highly valued as Barcelona. A bit off topic but I remember reading an article a while back where Xavi spoke about how they're taught about the 'shame' of losing the ball early on in La Masia. It really is a cardinal sin there. Besides I think his pass completion was only bettered by Scholes in our team last season so imo its the perfect signing at the perfect time for us and I hope it gets finalised soon. Whilst we dominate possession against the vast majority of teams, it's not the be all and end all for us, and I remember a discussion in the Cleverley thread a few weeks back where most were saying they'd rather he attempted the risky pass a bit more even if it didn't come off every now and then, and Thiago has that more penetrative side to his passing game also, as opposed to just recycling possession.
In regard to your earlier posts about MD and Sport, MD have also reported Thiago to United and I think they were one of the first to report Barcelona were willingly putting him up for sale back in May (I don't think we were heavily in the frame back then).
Edit: we were https://www.redcafe.net/threads/thiago-alcantara.355208/page-8#post-13482261
I can see where Brwned is coming from here. Revan it seems like you're applying a certain connotation with "attacking midfielder". I do think there is some nuance there and I'm sure you know being an AM doesn't automatically mean you play as a 10. Iniesta is more of an advanced midfielder. As an advanced midfielder, you don't have to be a regular scorer. However, it does require you to add more incisiveness to the attack. David Silva isn't a regular scorer but 2 seasons ago, when City won the title, he was integral to chance creation and maintaining their momentum throughout the game.Look at where Deco played for Porto. Look at where Iniesta plays for Spain. It becomes fairly obvious then that the players they use in centre mid aren't all typically used as centre mids in different systems.
Look at where Deco played for Porto. Look at where Iniesta plays for Spain. It becomes fairly obvious then that the players they use in centre mid aren't typically used as centre mids in different systems.
I'm not comfortable with him alongside Carrick in a 2.
You've got a very rigid view of an attacking midfielder. I'm not saying Iniesta is a classic Riquelme-type #10. I'll use pete's terminology (since he's the one that instigated this discussion) and say that Iniesta is a classic inside forward. That's why he often played on the "wing" for Barca and Spain. I don't agree at all that Thiago's more Xavi than Iniesta because he loves holding onto the ball, taking players on and taking risks - that's never been Xavi's game.
I do think he's capable of playing both roles like Deco though.
Thiago doesn't often 'take on' players, exactly. He doesn't pick up the ball some distance from them and then dribble at them with the intention of getting past, the way Iniesta sometimes does. He beats players who try and tackle or press him, which is something Xavi does all the time.
How far off are we now from the Sneijder thread in terms of views and replies? Should be close now surely
Really? Xavi would never attempt anything like this. He'll shift and shimmy and do his little turn to open up passing options - Thiago clearly likes to take players out of the game with dribbling. He doesn't have the pace to beat player after player in a long run in the way Iniesta can, sure, but then no-one's saying he's the next Iniesta while many are saying he's the new Xavi. There's a fundamental difference in style, for me, in the same way Deco was much more mobile and willing to beat a man than Xavi which ultimately made him a completely different player.
I've never seen Xavi attempt anything like that. Ever. Thiago can beat players on the dribble with consummate ease. At the same time, he's not like a Hazard type of dribbler where he is focused on dribbling at the defender. He's an immensely talented footballer. Why we try to shoehorn him into some sort of definable role is just silly. His skills mean we can use him in various ways. He will excel in certain positions more than others, but the premise is still the same. Thiago is much more risky in his play than Xavi. There's already one stark difference there. He's not necessarily your archetypal 10 or someone who is the ideal replacement for Xavi. However, he has the tools to excel as an advanced midfielder AND a CM playing deeper.As far as I can recollect that's the longest proper dribble Thiago has produced in a match, and he hardly had much choice in the matter. I'm sure you could find at least one instance of Xavi doing something similar - he often uses his skill and close control to escape tight pressure from several players like that. I'm not saying there's not a fundamental difference in style - obviously there is. But in terms of the role they play best, they're very similar.
I think it's daft making a scale of Xavi to Iniesta and deciding where to stick his head on that scale. There's a whole spectrum of skills to take into consideration. There's an adventure and urgency in his passing that is closer to Fabregas than either of them for a start.
I think we should forget about playing Thiago as center midfield in 442 formation. If he came we should move our game away from winger system and change our game to say 4231 or 433. We will have 2 of the best penetrative passer in the game - Thiago and Kagawa. There's no point to rely on our ineffective wingers (Valencia and Young) as our main source of attack.
Either way, awwwww yeah!Brightonian: Xavi===||======Iniesta
___Brwned: Xavi=======||==Iniesta
So either way were signing xaviesta.
Thiago and Rafinha: Two brothers, two worlds
Thiago Alcantara, 22 years since April, and Rafa Alcantara, 20 since February, they love and admire dearly. They are such good friends like brothers, something that does not always happen in all families.
And possibly the secret of such good value is that everyone has shown to have a personality that has respected the other. Soccer-speaking only share a passion for the ball with Barcelona shirt, but other issues everyone goes by. Even Thiago is right and Rafinha, left-handed.
Most striking is that Thiago was born in Bari (Italy) due to his father's sporting career, have chosen the Spanish and Rafinha, natural de Sao Paulo (Brazil), Brazil. The youngest of the Alcantara child spent more years there and scored more. But there is more.
Thiago is a firm of Nike while Rafinha was decided by Adidas. And when will negotiate with the club, the club can not 'kill two birds with one stone' because their agents are just different: Pere Guardiola, in the case of Thiago, and Gines Carvajal, in Rafinha.
It surprises me that United fans who've watched Park, Jones and Giggs play in the middle or Fletcher play on the wings can worry over what exact role Thiago might play in our next midfield. And yet, I feel obliged to get involved, because I reckon he can play anywhere that Anderson, Cleverley, Giggs/Park (in the middle) or Scholes have played (in the last 3 years) and most of the positions Carrick has. Of course he'll have a best position just as we'll have a best formation(s), but I wouldn't worry about what he can't do. Not yet.
Then there's the alleged sloppiness. Thiago will look like the model of discipline compared to most of our midfield. Barca are a tiki taka, triangle team until they approach the final third with the opposition mesmerised and pass to Messi. It looks like Thiago gets a bit impatient, he pauses with the ball at times, looks up and wants to break the pattern with an unexpected pass or an unexpected run. At Barca he isn't paid to do the unexpected, he's there to fit in and he can spoil the rhythm.
We'll welcome the unexpected and appreciate the incisiveness and pace changes. The United crowd will love him. We can worry if he comes and doesn't fit in after a few months, but I'll worry even more if he doesn't come. However, this is a time for blind optimism
He isn't a replacement for anyone. Players like Robson, Keane, Scholes don't get replaced, you just move on.
Last couple of pages have actually been half decent, people discussing his ability and where he would fit In at united.
So FCBarca, do you think he'd do we'll in a midfield 2 or is he better in a midfield 3?