Crackers
greasy ginfers
Choosing who to play between Thiago and Anderson would be like choosing who to bang between Scarlett Johannson and a morbidly obese monstrosity.
Choosing who to play between Thiago and Anderson would be like choosing who to bang between Scarlett Johannson and a morbidly obese monstrosity.
Don't they say fat girls give you more bang for your buck?Choosing who to play between Thiago and Anderson would be like choosing who to bang between Scarlett Johannson and a morbidly obese monstrosity.
we should add a couple of millions to the fee just to show that we have the money
MA-ZIN-HOOO'S son son son,
He's better then Anderson....
So basically Big Dave went to the U21s and got us Thiago. Things could get really exciting if he continues his work once he's in the senior squad.
Exactly. Not as if we actually bring out our cocks
RIGHT GUYS?
Choosing who to play between Thiago and Anderson would be like choosing who to bang between Scarlett Johannson and a morbidly obese monstrosity.
Very harsh, Anderson gets far too much stick around here.
Candy sticks?
Any new news? The last real update I had was the Hunter tweet.
Don't have time to catch up in the thread.
feck sake, if this article is correct, it looks like a buyout clause is more complex than simply paying it:
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writers/sid_lowe/01/29/atletico.buyouts/index.html
If the selling club plays hard ball, it can force the other club to pay 18% on VAT and 44% on taxes, which means that potentially the Thoago's transfer can
rise to around 30m EUR. The last point in that article is that clause is only for the clubs in the Spain, which I think is untrue considering the Martinez transfer.
It could be that is entirely bollocks though, I doubt that Bayern payed 65% more than the clause of Martinez.
As I recall, Bayern did pay more than Martinez's release clause, but that was more so due to tax in Basque, which is different than the rest of Spain.
It's all in theory, in reality no club will cause such trouble to the buyers as they won't see a penny over the release clause anyway, the rest of the money would just go to the government.
They paid IVA (VAT) and they had to take legal advice about how to pay the release clause without incurring an income tax liability.
The other issue was related to Barcelona complaining they couldn't compete on the signing. In the Basque country Martinez was paying tax at 26%, in the rest of Spain it's over 50%. So even to match his wages would have been prohibitive for them. Bayern just paid the extra money it took - but that was in wages.
feck sake, if this article is correct, it looks like a buyout clause is more complex than simply paying it:
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/writers/sid_lowe/01/29/atletico.buyouts/index.html
If the selling club plays hard ball, it can force the other club to pay 18% on VAT and 44% on taxes, which means that potentially the Thoago's transfer can
rise to around 30m EUR. The last point in that article is that clause is only for the clubs in the Spain, which I think is untrue considering the Martinez transfer.
It could be that is entirely bollocks though, I doubt that Bayern payed 65% more than the clause of Martinez.
It's all in theory, in reality no club will cause such trouble to the buyers as they won't see a penny over the release clause anyway, the rest of the money would just go to the government.
Smooth, Cina.
Smooth, Cina.
Just woke up/got to work... 45 pages to catch up on
Will let my boss know not to give me anything important to do
♫Thiago, whoa
Thiago, whoa
He came from Italy,
I'm failing Geography♫
How much was Martinez's release clause? And how much did Bayern paid him for in the end?
He was actually born in Italy.♫Thiago, whoa
Thiago, whoa
He came from Italy,
I'm failing Geography♫
I'm disappointed Steve, it's not about you. It should be about Thiaagooo anyway.♫Thiago, whoa
Thiago, whoa
He came from Italy,
I'm failing Geography♫
He was actually born in Italy.