The World Cup Final: France vs Croatia (Kickoff 16H00 BST)

Kanté has been shit, no doubt about that. He is weirdly scared today but at the same time everyone has a limit in terms of coolness.
His stupid foul led to the equalizer, like such a dumb foul it fecking annoys me

Definitely, it’s the biggest stage possible in football. For what it’s worth I’ve really liked Pogba’s overall performance this WC. The whole team have capitulated the first half, and are still, quite incredibly, leading :lol:
 
That’s not how the rule is applied. If the hand is in an unnatural place or moving towards the ball then it’s a penalty. It was a clear penalty
Do the rules say anything about “natural / unnatural position”? I thought that was just something that pundits say to try and sound clever. I thought the rules were around “deliberate”?
 
Very debatable. It can go both ways, what is suspiscious is the last second drop of his hands.
It's just movement.

But then again, I'm very skeptic of most handball penalties. Nothing to gain for the defender, just stupid. You give me a play like Suarez in SA, or Henry against Ireland (if it was on his penalty area) and I give, it. The other 90 % penalties are just bullshit, an idiotic randomness penalty that has been a part of football for too long. The game should rise above these things.
 
All the VAR team did was tell the ref there was something to look at because he'd clearly not seen it. He's got it totally wrong.
When it is obvious, VAR team doesn't call the ref (see Brazil vs Belgium for the penalty claims, despite that the Jesus one was quite close).
 
Croatia are a team of bullies. Not interested in playing football. Just gone out to kick and beat the shite out of France and big credit to them it's working beautifully. They shouldn't be behind. The free kick isn't a free kick. The penalty wasn't a penalty.
Hardly kicking them? Theyre being physical in outmuscling them and pressing them but they're dominating possession and getting in great positions. France has kind of done nothing yet somehow winning (thanks to the ref basically).
 
Kante and Pogba look equally poor, can't cover their fullbacks and had a lot of misplaced passes.
Croatia play very direct and fast, but are quite predictable sometimes.
 
That sort of thing is given every week in the PL.

You cry babies would be livid if something similar wasn't given in United's favour.

I believe Michael Carrick was the victim of a similar kind of decision vs Chelsea once so I'm going to call bullshit, Colin.

You're only cheering for France due to your love of Le Mans. :p
 
You can when you've got logic and experienced life as a human. Which human would move his hand that fast away from the ball. And if he got such superhuman brains, why would he do it? The danger was already over.
I may have misunderstood what you said.

I'm also blaming the ref.

VAR is a tool. Nothing more. Just like TV replays are a tool for you to come up with your own decision.

VAR, as such, is blameless. Like blaming a paintbrush for an artist making a shit painting.
 
Do the rules say anything about “natural / unnatural position”? I thought that was just something that pundits say to try and sound clever. I thought the rules were around “deliberate”?
I think they do because a french ref is also talking about it. All it tells you is that the handball rule need a revamp because it's too open for interpretation
 
Do the rules say anything about “natural / unnatural position”? I thought that was just something that pundits say to try and sound clever. I thought the rules were around “deliberate”?

The rules imply it and it’s how they’re applied. 99% of handballs that are called aren’t deliberate
 
It's almost as if people here have never played actual football or never jumped for a ball. You need to keep balance in the air, you can't jump like a pencil.
 
VAR should be used as reason to rewrite some of the rules or update them, make them precise, this handball on purpose or not, leaves so much space to gray area.
 
When it is obvious, VAR team doesn't call the ref (see Brazil vs Belgium for the penalty claims, despite that the Jesus one was quite close).

Yet you've still repeatedly claimed 5 refs agree with you when there's only one who made the decision.
 
That’s not how the rule is applied. If the hand is in an unnatural place or moving towards the ball then it’s a penalty. It was a clear penalty

For it to "move towards the ball" he needs to be a mind reader.

His arm is already coming down because that's where his arm is meant to go.
 
Do the rules say anything about “natural / unnatural position”? I thought that was just something that pundits say to try and sound clever. I thought the rules were around “deliberate”?
Yeah, just stupid. Unless you're trying to do a "volleyball block" against a header or something there really aren't "unnatural positions" for your limbs in football. They're all over the place.
 
To all the "experts" about penalties and when not to give them. What if the ball struck on goal and would have been a goal but it hit the player's hand and was deflected away. And the player in question didn't move his arm and it didn't look deliberate. Then what?
 
So because it took Croatia until extra time to beat England that makes England better than Belgium who lost in 90 minutes?

That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that a team that *struggles* but eventually gets to final has it tougher than another team that dispatches their more renewed opponents way more easier.
 
I tipped France to win the final but this referee has been pathetic. Ignoring the first goal which may have had an offsifde, that is not a penalty. Joke decision. Feel sorry for Croatia. This is not how a world cup final should be decided.
 
Yet you've still repeatedly claimed 5 refs agree with you when there's only one who made the decision.
What I am saying is that if it was such a clear non-pen, then the refs wouldn't have called the main ref to watch it. They thought that it probably was a pen (after watching it a few times). Then Pistora watched it 10 times and decided that it is a pen.
 
Great save Lloris.

In this tournament he's been like he was at Spurs in his first 2-3 seasons.
 
i take back my opinon that it was a penalty. After watching a few more times. I can still see why its been given because hand moves towards ball and knee movement looks like a disguise. Now...i think its too quick and too natural a movement for it to be given as handball. slow motion makes it harder for the ref because it looks a pen in slow motion. In real time, it was accidental. VAR should be shown to ref in real time for handballs
 
To all the "experts" about penalties and when not to give them. What if the ball struck on goal and would have been a goal but it hit the player's hand and was deflected away. And the player in question didn't move his arm and it didn't look deliberate. Then what?

It's not a penalty like Lahm in 2002....;)
 
What I am saying is that if it was such a clear non-pen, then the refs wouldn't have called the main ref to watch it. They thought that it probably was a pen (after watching it a few times). Then Pistora watched it 10 times and decided that it is a pen.

Referees are far from infallible.
 
Croatia started great second half. They need to score though as France will have strong spell eventually.