The Veron Knockers!

Originally posted by WeasteDevil:
<strong>Nice how Neil very rarely answers any serious questions put towards him isn't it, despite his endless hours of analysis?</strong><hr></blockquote>

and twists it to try and show himself hes right when infact hes made himself look a tit
 
Originally posted by WeasteDevil:
<strong>Nice how Neil very rarely answers any serious questions put towards him isn't it, despite his endless hours of analysis?</strong><hr></blockquote>
What haven't I answered then?
 
Originally posted by Livvie20:
<strong>And our best performances have in the main come from 4-4-2. A lot of those games you refer to started with one striker, but we won them when we changed to two.</strong><hr></blockquote>

EXACTLY

Options, when things arnt going well we have options.
Look at the Bolton & Everton games to see 442 v 451 in its essence.
 
Originally posted by Murt:
<strong>

EXACTLY

Options, when things arnt going well we have options.
Look at the Bolton & Everton games to see 442 v 451 in its essence.</strong><hr></blockquote>

That's a crazy thinking.
We should start with a more aggressive formation and kill off the match as fast as possible, that's the way United did in our best years. The worst thing we did in these two seasons was start with a far less offensive 4-5-1 at home, thus giving opponents chances to settle their feet, and their confidence grew with the match carried on goal-less.

Take the Everton game as example. Scholes earned us the win, but not until the last three minutes. If we have started with 4-4-2 with Scholes in CM, there were every chances we would have scored one or two goals in the first hour, thus won it much more comfortably.
 
Originally posted by uranushk1:
<strong>

That's a crazy thinking.
We should start with a more aggressive formation and kill off the match as fast as possible, that's the way United did in our best years. The worst thing we did in these two seasons was start with a far less offensive 4-5-1 at home, thus giving opponents chances to settle their feet, and their confidence grew with the match carried on goal-less.
Take the Everton game as example. Scholes earned us the win, but not until the last three minutes. If we have started with 4-4-2 with Scholes in CM, there were every chances we would have scored one or two goals in the first hour, thus won it much more comfortably.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Explain to me then what we should have done in the Bolton game then?
Bearing in mind that Everton are a better team etc.
Seeing as your a fan "100% 442" perhaps you can also explain why in the last season and a half weve lost just 2 games with a 451 system and 9 with a 442 system?

(ppl seem to think that if we play 442 every week well be 3 up after 30 minutes <img src="graemlins/houllier.gif" border="0" alt="[Houllier]" /> )
 
Veron is class. I've defended him dogedly since he joined (remember how WE were ALL so excited when we signed this world class player). I continually feel as if he about to come good, But feeling like that for 1 and a half years has worn me down :(

Unfortunately he just hasnt worked for us. Our midfield has always attacked as a unit and defended as a unit. Veron wants his team mates to work to make time and space for him. Man Utd's midfield is used to working for each other. Once you give Veron space and time, like we've been getting in Europe, Seba can hurt teams.

In the Prem, and more so when we've not been playing as well as we can, everyone has to work hard to turn things around. Veron works hard, but he just doesnt have a defensive bone in his body. He cant tackle. It's embarrassing when he tries to tackle. When he's pressured he concedes possession and his passing game goes to pot.

Great player, and though I hope (and pray) that he helps us achieve European glory, I cant see him ever being great for us in the Prem :(
 
Originally posted by Murt:
<strong>

EXACTLY

Options, when things arnt going well we have options.
Look at the Bolton & Everton games to see 442 v 451 in its essence.</strong><hr></blockquote>

But Murt - you can find games when it has worked brilliantly if you look for them.

You're being selective again. And your figures are flawed because in some of those 451 games, we were losing or drawing until we reverted to 442.

Fact - at one point last year we lost 1 game out of 13. And guess which one.
 
After 57 votes and less than a day, the poll so far reads:
4-4-2 48 votes
4-4-1-1 2 votes
4-5-1 1 vote (just Murt :p )
3-5-2 5 votes
3-4-3 1 vote
 
Originally posted by Neil Thomson:
<strong>After 57 votes and less than a day, the poll so far reads:

4-5-1 1 vote (just Murt :p )
</strong><hr></blockquote>

He must be proud of that! <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />
 
Originally posted by Neil Thomson:
<strong>After 57 votes and less than a day, the poll so far reads:
4-4-2 48 votes
4-4-1-1 2 votes
4-5-1 1 vote (just Murt :p )
3-5-2 5 votes
3-4-3 1 vote</strong><hr></blockquote>

where is the poll? <img src="confused.gif" border="0">
 
great, the redcafe poll will tell fergie he's wrong. <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />

<img src="graemlins/houllier.gif" border="0" alt="[Houllier]" />
 
Originally posted by Neil Thomson:
<strong>That almost no-one, apart from Murt, thinks that 4-5-1 is better than 4-4-2 in the league.</strong><hr></blockquote>

it deepends Neil.. I think Murt mentioned it somewhere. But saying 4-4-2 will bring success is definately a <img src="graemlins/nono.gif" border="0" alt="[No No]" /> ( you should know that! ;) )

and you cannot play 4-4-2 against any team in the world.. have to adapt and change in accodance to the opposing team!
 
Originally posted by Neil Thomson:
<strong>
<a href="https://www.redcafe.net/home/" target="_blank">Which formation should we use in the Premier League? </a></strong><hr></blockquote>
Here pjaya.
 
I've choosen 4-4-1-1 which I find more adaptable to 4-5-1 and 4-4-2.
 
Originally posted by pjaya:
<strong>

it deepends Neil.. I think Murt mentioned it somewhere. But saying 4-4-2 will bring success is definately a <img src="graemlins/nono.gif" border="0" alt="[No No]" /> ( you should know that! ;) )

and you cannot play 4-4-2 against any team in the world.. have to adapt and change in accodance to the opposing team!</strong><hr></blockquote>
4-4-2 is just one part of it, obviously, and it does sometimes have to be crafted according to the opposition, but in the league the champions have almost always consistently played a 4-4-2.
 
Thats a stupid pole and bound ot give a stupid answer.
for starters does that pole mean that we should use the exact same formation inevery game?
442 had hit a brick wall in Europe, "put 2 ppl on Giggs & Beckham when Utd have possesionand were sorted" was the simple tactic to stifle us.


fao
uranushky
Seeing as your a fan "100% 442" perhaps you can also explain why in the last season and a half weve lost just 2 games with a 451 system and 9 with a 442 system?

im still waiting for ananswer
<img src="graemlins/yawn.gif" border="0" alt="[Yawn]" />
 
Maybe the poll should be clarified.

4-5-1 is acceptable away in Europe. It might even work in certain away games in England.

But my biggest gripe is not playing 4-4-2 at Old Trafford.
 
Originally posted by Livvie20:
<strong>Fact - at one point last year we lost 1 game out of 13. And guess which one.</strong><hr></blockquote>

the liverpool game at home.
Our 5th loss in a row to them, the previous 4 being with 442.
Even more proof that our formation hasnt been our problem.
 
Originally posted by Livvie20:
<strong>Maybe the poll should be clarified.

4-5-1 is acceptable away in Europe. It might even work in certain away games in England.

But my biggest gripe is not playing 4-4-2 at Old Trafford.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Its our home record this season though that is poor, just one win away in the league.
 
Originally posted by Murt:
<strong>Thats a stupid pole and bound ot give a stupid answer.
for starters does that pole mean that we should use the exact same formation inevery game?
442 had hit a brick wall in Europe, "put 2 ppl on Giggs & Beckham when Utd have possesionand were sorted" was the simple tactic to stifle us.


fao
uranushky
Seeing as your a fan "100% 442" perhaps you can also explain why in the last season and a half weve lost just 2 games with a 451 system and 9 with a 442 system?

im still waiting for ananswer
<img src="graemlins/yawn.gif" border="0" alt="[Yawn]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>

And you're not telling us which of those 4-5-1 games were more successful after we brought on a striker sub.

And you're not saying much about the 13 game run when we played 4-4-2 in 12 (won 12) and 4-5-1 in one.
 
Originally posted by Murt:
<strong>Thats a stupid pole and bound ot give a stupid answer.
for starters does that pole mean that we should use the exact same formation inevery game?
442 had hit a brick wall in Europe, "put 2 ppl on Giggs & Beckham when Utd have possesionand were sorted" was the simple tactic to stifle us.


fao
uranushky
Seeing as your a fan "100% 442" perhaps you can also explain why in the last season and a half weve lost just 2 games with a 451 system and 9 with a 442 system?

im still waiting for ananswer
<img src="graemlins/yawn.gif" border="0" alt="[Yawn]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>
<img src="graemlins/yawn.gif" border="0" alt="[Yawn]" /> You're waiting for another answer cos you never listen to the answers. Name the 9 games, and we'll dig up the match threads, teamsheets, substitutions, and see if you're making this up or not.
 
Originally posted by Neil Thomson:
<strong>
<img src="graemlins/yawn.gif" border="0" alt="[Yawn]" /> You're waiting for another answer cos you never listen to the answers. Name the 9 games, and we'll dig up the match threads, teamsheets, substitutions, and see if you're making this up or not.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Check the 8 matches we lost last season and the 3 this season.
Only in 2 (arsenal & Pool @ home) did we start with a 451 formation.
I listen to all the answers, problem is their all the same

"we should play 442 so that we can be 3 up after 20 minutes and kill the game off" seems to be the logiv behind it
:rolleyes:
 
Also, instead of telling us how many games we lost with 4-4-2, as opposed to 4-5-1, let's also have the stats for the games we won.


I'm genuinely interested. If it can be proved that we've been more successful with 4-5-1, then fair play.
 
Originally posted by Livvie20:
<strong>Also, instead of telling us how many games we lost with 4-4-2, as opposed to 4-5-1, let's also have the stats for the games we won.


I'm genuinely interested. If it can be proved that we've been more successful with 4-5-1, then fair play.</strong><hr></blockquote>

That's a bit of an undertaking isn't it?
 
1) FA Community Shield Liverpool 2 - 1 Man Utd 12-08-2001

2) English Premier Newcastle 4 - 3 Man Utd 15-09-2001

3) European Cup Deportivo 2 - 1 Man Utd 25-09-2001

4) European Cup Man Utd 2 - 3 Deportivo 17-10-2001

5) English Premier Man Utd 1 - 2 Bolton 20-10-2001

6) English Premier Liverpool 3 - 1 Man Utd 04-11-2001

7) English Premier Arsenal 3 - 1 Man Utd 25-11-2001

8) English Premier Man Utd 0 - 3 Chelsea 01-12-2001

9) English Premier Man Utd 0 - 1 West Ham 08-12-2001

10) English Premier Man Utd 0 - 1 Liverpool 22-01-2002

11) English Premier Man Utd 0 - 1 Middlesbro 23-03-2002

12) English Premier Man Utd 0 - 1 Arsenal 08-05-2002

These are the games in question then. We can take a look at each in turn, starting with the Community Shield game.
 
Originally posted by pjaya:
<strong>

and you cannot play 4-4-2 against any team in the world.. have to adapt and change in accodance to the opposing team!</strong><hr></blockquote>

actually they did..

especially in Europe.. once the wingers get marked out of the game.. the midfield can get over ran...

the only thing we're missing is a link player, like cantona.. we've always played this system the only difference is that, we don't have two wingers who don't(can't?) fly down the wings.. altho away from home it works as a defensive tactic, by tucking in the wide players, and stiffling the oppostion space in the centre.....
 
Barthez ,Irwin ,Silvestre ,Gary Neville ,Stam ,Beckham ,Butt ( Yorke ,66 ) ,Keane ,Giggs ,Scholes ,van Nistelrooy
McAllister 2 (p)
Owen 16
van Nistelrooy 51

This was clearly a 4-5-1, only reverting to 4-4-2 after 66 minutes by which time we were losing 2-1. Subsequent to that, no more goals were conceded or scored.
 
Originally posted by Livvie20:
<strong>and you're not telling us which of those 4-5-1 games were more successful after we brought on a striker sub.
And you're not saying much about the 13 game run when we played 4-4-2 in 12 (won 12) and 4-5-1 in one.</strong><hr></blockquote>

just did the 13 game thingy.

As regards bringing on the extra striker sub i would almost presume we brought on the extra striker in the majority of games.
I appeal to youse all, look at the Everton/ Bolton games to see the advantages of 451.
When 442 doesnt work we have nothing.
When 451 doesnt work we have.
 
Originally posted by Livvie20:
<strong>I'm genuinely interested. If it can be proved that we've been more successful with 4-5-1, then fair play.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Man United 1:0 West Bromwich Albion
451
3points

Chelsea 2:2 Man United
451
1point

Man United 1:0 Middlesbrough
451
3points

Man Utd 3 - 0 Everton
451
3points

Fulham 1 - 1 Man Utd
451
1point

Man Utd 2 - 1 Southampton
451
3points

Giving 14 out of a possible 18 for the 451 system
ca 2.2 points/ game

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Sunderland 1:1 Man United
442
1point

Man United 0:1 Bolton Wanderers
442
0points

Leeds 1 - 0 Man Utd
442
0points

Man Utd 1 - 0 Tottenham Final score
442
3points
Charlton 1 - 3 Man Utd
442
3points

Man Utd 1 - 1 Aston Villa
442
1points

Man City 3 - 1 Man Utd
442
0points

West Ham United 1:1 Man United
442
1points
Man Utd 5 - 3 Newcastle
442
1 0

giving 12 points for using the 442 out of a possible 24 points. 1.5 points/ game

(by 442 im counting games where we started with two strikers ie Diego, Olle or Ruud)

Anyone prepared to accept that maybe, just maybe 451 isnt so bad?
 
<a href="http://www.redcafe.info//ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=1&t=001676&p=" target="_blank">Newcastle 4 - 3 Man Utd</a>

Barthez ,Gary Neville ,Phil Neville ,Blanc ,Brown ,Beckham ,Veron ,Keane (sent off 90) ,Giggs ,Cole ( Scholes ,59 ) ,van Nistelrooy

Robert 5
van Nistelrooy 29
Lee 34
Dabizas 52

1-3 in the 4-4-2, changed to 4-5-1 with Scholes:
Giggs 62
Veron 64
Brown 82 (og)
2-1 in the 4-5-1.

1 loss to 4-4-2.
 
Deportivo 2 - 1 Man Utd

Barthez ,Irwin ,Johnsen ,Blanc ,Gary Neville ,Giggs ,Veron ,Keane ,Beckham ( Cole ,89 ) ,Scholes ,van Nistelrooy ( Solskjaer ,89 )

Scholes 40
Pandiani 86
Naybet 89

2 losses to the 4-5-1
 
Man Utd 2 - 3 Deportivo
van Nistelrooy 7
Sergio Gonzalez 37
Tristan 38
van Nistelrooy 40
Tristan 60

Barthez ,Gary Neville ,Johnsen (Brown ,8 ) ,Blanc ,Irwin (Solskjaer ,85 ) ,Beckham ,Veron ,Keane ,Giggs ,Scholes (Cole ,63 ) ,van Nistelrooy

2-3 using 4-5-1, then no more goals scored or conceded after bringing on Cole, nor when moving to a 3-4-3 when Ole was brought on.

4-5-1 3 losses
 
Originally posted by Neil Thomson:
<strong>Deportivo 2 - 1 Man Utd
</strong><hr></blockquote>

Your mixing European football with it now.
Stick to the league for the minute,
Let us establish which has been most effective over the last 53 games in the league, and then Europe sepearately,