The vaccines | vaxxed boosted unvaxxed? New poll

How's your immunity looking? Had covid - vote twice - vax status and then again for infection status

  • Vaxxed but no booster

  • Boostered

  • Still waiting in queue for first vaccine dose

  • Won't get vaxxed (unless I have to for travel/work etc)

  • Past infection with covid + I've been vaccinated

  • Past infection with covid - I've not been vaccinated


Results are only viewable after voting.


The calculations he does there are nonsense.

You can only do that efficacy maths assuming you’re comparing two randomised, equally matched cohorts with the variant widely and equally distributed across the whole country. Which isn’t the case here at all. The numbers are tiny and it’s possible that every single vaccinated person exposed to the new variant became infected. We’ve absolutely no way of knowing based on these numbers alone.

I hate the way Twitter seems to promote tweets from the most obviously biased covid “experts” from both extremes. Really shines a light on how it promotes political extreme and completely distorts reality. Unlesss you’re extremely careful about who you follow (and 90% of people won’t be well informed enough about the issue to spot these biases)
 
Last edited:
The calculations he does there are nonsense.

You can only do that efficacy maths assuming you’re comparing two randomised, equally matched cohorts with the variant widely and equally distributed across the whole country.
Which isn’t the case here at all. The numbers are tiny and it’s possible that every single vaccinated person exposed to the new variant became infected. We’ve absolutely no way of knowing based on these numbers alone.

I hate the way Twitter seems to promote tweets from the most obviously biased covid “experts” from both extremes. Really shines a light on how it promotes political extreme and completely distorts reality. Unlesss you’re extremely careful about who you follow (and 90% of people won’t be well informed enough about the issue to spot these biases)

I agree. Which is why I've stopped quoting percentages to my patients when they come in for jabs or to family members. There's so much variation between trial and real world data. But misunderstanding of efficacy percentages, statistical power etc in reporting I put aside at first as laziness but its less excusable now.

Currently reading Tom Chivers' book around this topic, which is great
https://www.amazon.co.uk/How-Read-Numbers-Statistics-Knowing/dp/1474619967
 
The calculations he does there are nonsense.

You can only do that efficacy maths assuming you’re comparing two randomised, equally matched cohorts with the variant widely and equally distributed across the whole country. Which isn’t the case here at all. The numbers are tiny and it’s possible that every single vaccinated person exposed to the new variant became infected. We’ve absolutely no way of knowing based on these numbers alone.

I hate the way Twitter seems to promote tweets from the most obviously biased covid “experts” from both extremes. Really shines a light on how it promotes political extreme and completely distorts reality. Unlesss you’re extremely careful about who you follow (and 90% of people won’t be well informed enough about the issue to spot these biases)
No they aren't nonsense. They are the calculations that can be done with the information provided, obviously more info would allow for better calculations. And he is hardly extreme in any way.
 
No they aren't nonsense. They are the calculations that can be done with the information provided, obviously more info would allow for better calculations. And he is hardly extreme in any way.

They are nonsense though. Even the act of doing that calculation is stupid when you’re talking about a tiny number of cases and a variant that has only recently arrived in the country. For all we know all those positive cases are a single outbreak where everyone exposed was fully vaccinated. Or not one of those cases is from someone who got the vaccine. To try and spin that into an actual 92% figure for efficacy is ludicrous.

Don’t know about extreme but based on his twitter feed he only ever seems to be interested in presenting information that reassures or minimises the threat of the pandemic. It’s a constant theme on Twitter. So many accounts have risen to prominence during covid based on carefully curated content to either minimise or exaggerate the danger.

There’s also a hell of a lot of good/balanced content on there - if you dig for it - but it’s the “agenda tweeters” that the algorithms seem to promote the most consistently.
 
They are nonsense though. Even the act of doing that calculation is stupid when you’re talking about a tiny number of cases and a variant that has only recently arrived in the country. For all we know all those positive cases are a single outbreak where everyone exposed was fully vaccinated. Or not one of those cases is from someone who got the vaccine. To try and spin that into an actual 92% figure for efficacy is ludicrous.

Don’t know about extreme but based on his twitter feed he only ever seems to be interested in presenting information that reassures or minimises the threat of the pandemic. It’s a constant theme on Twitter. So many accounts have risen to prominence during covid based on carefully curated content to either minimise or exaggerate the danger.

There’s also a hell of a lot of good/balanced content on there - if you dig for it - but it’s the “agenda tweeters” that the algorithms seem to promote the most consistently.
It is quite clearly better to do those calculations than just to look at raw info from the article. His point obviously isn't that the efficacy is exactly 92%
 
It is quite clearly better to do those calculations than just to look at raw info from the article. His point obviously isn't that the efficacy is exactly 92%

Reading that series of tweets that’s exactly the point you would conclude. He didn’t include any caveats and doesn’t acknowledge the obvious holes in his logic when they’re highlighted in the replies.

Doing those calculations is definitely worse than looking at the raw data, shrugging your shoulders, and concluding “not enough data to tell us anything useful “. Which is the only reasonable response.
 
Reading that series of tweets that’s exactly the point you would conclude. He didn’t include any caveats and doesn’t acknowledge the obvious holes in his logic when they’re highlighted in the replies.

Doing those calculations is definitely worse than looking at the raw data, shrugging your shoulders, and concluding “not enough data to tell us anything useful “. Which is the only reasonable response.
No it isn't. Just like nobody should have read the vaccine press releases as exact numbers.

Heh, no.
 
No it isn't. Just like nobody should have read the vaccine press releases as exact numbers.

Heh, no.

Well, exactly.

And those figures might as well be set in fecking stone compared to the nonsensical calculations in that tweet.

I’ve no dog in this fight other than to say the idea of working out vaccine effectiveness based on the numbers in that news article is utterly pointless. So everyone should be just as dismissive of his tweets about these data as he seems to want them to be about the news article that first presented them.
 
Well, exactly.

And those figures might as well be set in fecking stone compared to the nonsensical calculations in that tweet.

I’ve no dog in this fight other than to say the idea of working out vaccine effectiveness based on the numbers in that news article is utterly pointless. So everyone should be just as dismissive of his tweets about these data as he seems to want them to be about the news article that first presented them.

The beat vaccine is the one in your arm.

Fingers crossed I should be able to get the AZ in the next month now that they have restricted its use to the over 50s
 
Well, exactly.

And those figures might as well be set in fecking stone compared to the nonsensical calculations in that tweet.

I’ve no dog in this fight other than to say the idea of working out vaccine effectiveness based on the numbers in that news article is utterly pointless. So everyone should be just as dismissive of his tweets about these data as he seems to want them to be about the news article that first presented them.
It is a math exercise, so therefore can't be pointless :p
 
57338881_7.png



The ranking below is more complete and recent, indicating the following big 4: Malta, UK, Hungary and Serbia with a rate superior to 50%

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1196071/covid-19-vaccination-rate-in-europe-by-country/
 
This is a decent read and shows how important getting as many people vaccinated as possible is and how the effectiveness % is misunderstood i.e. 95% effectiveness doesn't mean 1 in 20 people will get covid. The bit I especially liked was " 88 out of 87 million fully vaccinated people in the US had been reported dead as of April 20, and 11 of those were unrelated to Covid. That’s a death rate of less than one in a million. "

https://english.aawsat.com/home/art...il/how-good-are-vaccines-try-999999-effective
 
Last edited:
2nd Moderna shot due on 27th May. Text this morning from the hospital. Can’t wait to be fully done :D

I'm getting my second Moderna shot on 14 May. Friendly reminder though, that won't mean we are invincible. Singapore recently have an outbreak at a hospital, and several staff who were vaccinated still caught it.

Stay safe my friend!
 
Denmark is opening up the AstraZeneca vaccine to whoever wants it, apparently there are around 450k doses. To get vaccinated, there is a video consultation with a doctor, who explains the risk involved and then one needs to provide consent.
 
Denmark is opening up the AstraZeneca vaccine to whoever wants it, apparently there are around 450k doses. To get vaccinated, there is a video consultation with a doctor, who explains the risk involved and then one needs to provide consent.

Must be a Europe wide thing because Italy has just started talking about re-assessing it's use in under 60s.
 
Turned 30 last month, got my jab this weekend. AZ. Not entirely sure how NI has been so efficient but the person giving it to me said she expected her kids, in their 20s, to be getting one in a couple of weeks.

Felt great for the first 10hrs, then started getting the chills. It’s a bit freaky getting them without fever, just feels like your body’s seizing, after it lasts for a few mins you start to think...hmm, I bet this is what the early onset of Guillain-Barré feels like, muscle spasms, limited control over movement. Lasted for a few hours in waves, then just got the usual fatigue and headache for the next day, now back to normal other than a deadly dead arm.
 
Turned 30 last month, got my jab this weekend. AZ. Not entirely sure how NI has been so efficient but the person giving it to me said she expected her kids, in their 20s, to be getting one in a couple of weeks.

Felt great for the first 10hrs, then started getting the chills. It’s a bit freaky getting them without fever, just feels like your body’s seizing, after it lasts for a few mins you start to think...hmm, I bet this is what the early onset of Guillain-Barré feels like, muscle spasms, limited control over movement. Lasted for a few hours in waves, then just got the usual fatigue and headache for the next day, now back to normal other than a deadly dead arm.
I thought I was being a bit of a puss about my arm but it was certainly very noticeable :eek:
 
I read that this morning too. Depressing.
One of the comments mentioned the 30% that are anti-vaccers, 30% think the 2020 election was stolen, 30% are Trump supporters = no coincidence, it's the same 30%.
It makes sense as once they'll believe any old thing, vaccination conspiracies aren't a reach for them.

Republicans are significantly more likely to be vaccine hesitant but there is still a sizeable portion of democrats too, in part because younger people and black people are more vaccine hesitant in general. Vaccine hesitancy has faded gradually as they were approved and rolled out, it isn’t a worsening situation nor unexpected, it’s just the uncomfortable reality people hoped wouldn’t materialise. The people at the end of the queue were the most likely to reject it, it was never plausible that it would continue at the same rate.

The worsening situation is on the epidemiological side not psychological: the virus is spreading more easily and the original herd immunity estimates were, as Fauci said himself just as the roll out started, a generous reading of uncertain data to aid public health messaging. So even if vaccination rates were better than they expected, it still wouldn’t reach herd immunity. The growing likelihood of variants escaping the vaccine just compounds that.
 

I have a coworker whose husband is a firefighter and refused to get the vaccine when he could have a couple months ago. She hasn't either. He tested positive about 3 weeks ago and spent over a week in the hospital because his breathing was so bad. He went home last Wednesday but was back in the hospital the next day because his breathing had worsened. He'll be on oxygen while his lungs heal and will require 24 hour assistance and supervision at home. Now my coworker will have to stay home to take care of him for the foreseeable future.

I found out today she'd used a "religious" exemption for the flu shot in the past since it's required for work, likely because she couldn't find a doctor to write a note.

I feel bad about wanting to scream "I told you so," but it's indicative of a larger group of people either too stupid or too selfish to get the vaccine. We're approaching a point where everyone over 16 has had a chance to get the vaccine, and I sincerely wish there would be consequences for those who've refused, like exclusion from events, mandatory isolation when traveling, etc.
 
What does she do for work?

Clerical work at a university.

She shares an office with someone who has been vaccinated as well. Even though I'm vaccinated, I don't want to be stuck in an office with an unvaccinated person regardless of whether they're required to wear masks. It's not an issue right now since I'm working from home full-time and won't be back before July 1, but it's definitely going to create issues over workspace.
 
Last edited:
I know. I have some folk like that at work too. I’ve been telling one of them that he can’t go to lunch with us until he’s vaccinated (once we go back to the office). He’s a trumper that thinks the election was stolen too. I despair.