Perhaps it’s the way you’re explaining your position, but if I can try to summarise the fundamental difference as it comes across to me…
You seem to be suggesting he’s a “small government libertarian” (your posts say he’s inclined towards those policies which suggests that’s his motivation), and as a byproduct of this bad shit can result.
I (and I think most every else) sees it as he’s an evil cnut doing evil things because all he cares about is enriching himself and his mates, who in turn enrich him, and pleasing his angry mob. Then as a byproduct of that, some stuff may fit the libertarian narrative in some way.
The difference is what he’s aiming for and what is by accident. Labelling him the way you are insisting on doing is focusing on the wrong thing.