The Trump Presidency - Part 2

Trump was a nobody in GOP until he became somebody in the GOP by crapping all over GOP established politicians. I am not saying that Dean Phillps has the name recognition of Trump, but Obama wasn't that known either until 2008 primaries. America/World loves to cheer for an underdog so I think Dean Phillpis can elevate democratic party from an untrusted and unauthentic organization it has become.

Wow, I did not realize Bernie is and has been independent since 1978 and has only been democrat during primaries. Thank you for pointing that out. Well, that explains why DNC establishment made sure he does not come up to the top. Bernie's popularity during 2016 and 2020 primaries are to me a clear evidence that DNC needs fresh people and fresh ideas.

Personally I don't believe the establishment dems (clintons, obamas, pelosi etc...) will ever relinquish any power to someone like Bernie, who wants to fix the system. They don't want to fix it, they want to keep it exactly as it is.
 
I'm just one of 330 million Americans but I like to think I knew my country fairly well. But I did not and have seen many conservative friends of mine -- who are active in politics and like to think of themselves as men and women of principle, fall prey, one by one, to this madman of a clown and his court jesters.
Same here. It's been depressing.
 
Personally I don't believe the establishment dems (clintons, obamas, pelosi etc...) will ever relinquish any power to someone like Bernie, who wants to fix the system. They don't want to fix it, they want to keep it exactly as it is.
I do think there is some false equivalency however. Dems are often held to a higher standard and you can't tell me that Rs, especially not Trump have fixed things, other than fixing it to benefit themselves the most. Unless of course record numbers of indictments, corruption and ethics investigations, massively adding to the national debt, stripping regulatory and legislative protections for the vulnerable, adding dark money and using off the books or questionable contractors (Iraq, the wall, etc), as well as add non sense departments to the system is someone s idea of fixing things.
 
Personally I don't believe the establishment dems (clintons, obamas, pelosi etc...) will ever relinquish any power to someone like Bernie, who wants to fix the system. They don't want to fix it, they want to keep it exactly as it is.
Is there even anyone like Bernie? I fear when he is gone, there won't be anyone left to carry the torch. I liked Katie Porter, but she didn't really stand a chance at getting a foothold in the party.
 
I do think there is some false equivalency however. Dems are often held to a higher standard and you can't tell me that Rs, especially not Trump have fixed things, other than fixing it to benefit themselves the most. Unless of course record numbers of indictments, corruption and ethics investigations, massively adding to the national debt, stripping regulatory and legislative protections for the vulnerable and add non sense departments to the system is someone s idea of fixing things.

oh yeah 100%, I'm not suggesting the Rs are any better. I'm left of the dems and I hold them to a higher standard because I've given up all hope of the GOP, to be frank..
 
Is there even anyone like Bernie? I fear when he is gone, there won't be anyone left to carry the torch. I liked Katie Porter, but she didn't really stand a chance at getting a foothold in the party.

Not that I'm aware of, but I don't follow it that closely. Bernie was such a great opportunity to create/build a movement, such a shame he's too old for it now. When he lost that 2016 primary I lost a lot of hope in politics. They had a chance to defeat Trump/MAGA there and then but they chose fecking Hillary instead.
 
Is there even anyone like Bernie? I fear when he is gone, there won't be anyone left to carry the torch. I liked Katie Porter, but she didn't really stand a chance at getting a foothold in the party.
I think that ship has sailed for now. The US could do with adding at least two more parties with the Bernie's of the world being part of possible majority parliamentary decision making but clearly we won't see that happening anytime soon. When I think of any name that's been on the rise or I can see being on the rise I consider them all to be more moderates once you detach them from the LGBTQ or sustainability train. I think even someone like AOC has moved considerably more to the center.
oh yeah 100%, I'm not suggesting the Rs are any better. I'm left of the dems and I hold them to a higher standard because I've given up all hope of the GOP, to be frank..
Very fair. And I'm with you. Unfortunately I also think we re in a world now where we have to lower our own standards and expectations. The firmly progressive experiment seems to have run its course. At least for now. Perhaps the way of the world is that most people actually like autocrats and representative democracy itself is on the chopping block. Throughout human history we probably have been under autocratic rule way more than anything else. I just hoped - and still do- that people are able to educate themselves more than they did in all the other times in history. Especially in the West. But clearly that has been weaponized to go the other way.
 
Not that I'm aware of, but I don't follow it that closely. Bernie was such a great opportunity to create/build a movement, such a shame he's too old for it now. When he lost that 2016 primary I lost a lot of hope in politics. They had a chance to defeat Trump/MAGA there and then but they chose fecking Hillary instead.
Sorry but Bernie wouldn't have beaten Trump/MAGA in 2016, he's too left-wing for the American public at large, in Europe he'd be considered a centrist edging to the left, in the US he's seen as a Socialist or outright Communist
 
Sorry but Bernie wouldn't have beaten Trump/MAGA in 2016, he's too left-wing for the American public at large, in Europe he'd be considered a centrist edging to the left, in the US he's seen as a Socialist or outright Communist

I understand that, but I disagree. By the way, in the UK and a few other european countries he'd be labelled a commie too.

But Hillary was a uniquely disliked candidate. She is textbook establishment and Trump was positioning as anti-establishment. A perfect candidate for Trump to pull apart.
And people loved Bernie, who wasn't seen as establishment therefore disarming the MAGA weaponry. 2016 was a slightly different time also, including in regards to how the public viewed Bernie. We'll never know, but if the DNC had actually backed him and funded him, he'd have given Trump a much better race IMO.
 
What post is this guy going to get (he has to be jonesing for one):

mypillow_2.jpg
 
I understand that, but I disagree. By the way, in the UK and a few other european countries he'd be labelled a commie too.

But Hillary was a uniquely disliked candidate. She is textbook establishment and Trump was positioning as anti-establishment. A perfect candidate for Trump to pull apart.
And people loved Bernie, who wasn't seen as establishment therefore disarming the MAGA weaponry. 2016 was a slightly different time also, including in regards to how the public viewed Bernie. We'll never know, but if the DNC had actually backed him and funded him, he'd have given Trump a much better race IMO.
All the idiots who’ve no idea how tariffs work and don’t care would’ve suddenly started demanding full details on how Bernie intends to pay for his initiatives that’ll benefit them. Fox would’ve seen to that.
 
I understand that, but I disagree. By the way, in the UK and a few other european countries he'd be labelled a commie too.

But Hillary was a uniquely disliked candidate. She is textbook establishment and Trump was positioning as anti-establishment. A perfect candidate for Trump to pull apart.
And people loved Bernie, who wasn't seen as establishment therefore disarming the MAGA weaponry. 2016 was a slightly different time also, including in regards to how the public viewed Bernie. We'll never know, but if the DNC had actually backed him and funded him, he'd have given Trump a much better race IMO.
Re: Sanders isn't a member of the Democratic party, why would the DNC back him over one of their own?

Sure a lot of people loved him, but even more hated him, if you want someone to blame for Trump then James Comey is your man, for all that was disliked about Clinton she would almost certainly have won in 2016 had he not broken the protocols he weas supposed to have followed, her winning would have meant no Biden either!
 
Re: Sanders isn't a member of the Democratic party, why would the DNC back him over one of their own?

Sure a lot of people loved him, but even more hated him, if you want someone to blame for Trump then James Comey is your man, for all that was disliked about Clinton she would almost certainly have won in 2016 had he not broken the protocols he weas supposed to have followed, her winning would have meant no Biden either!

well I was hoping to win the election instead of Trump

anyway, doesn't matter, I'm staunchly remaining in my position of blaming Hillary and the dems for the 2016 defeat, sorry!
 
If you went to film and tv companies, trying to pitch a script for a crossover show blending Idiocracy and the Handmaids Tale. you would get laughed out of the room by every single one.

Yet here we are in actual real life.
 
If you went to film and tv companies, trying to pitch a script for a crossover show blending Idiocracy and the Handmaids Tale. you would get laughed out of the room by every single one.

Yet here we are in actual real life.
Aye. No wonder the onion basically got out of a job during his first term. And yet everyone who paid but a bit of attention the first time around or any of the years since should have totally seen this coming. But I also have come to realize many Dem voters and highly educated folks as well are just as guilty of being completely ignorant of the world around them. Id argue this country better than others celebrates willful ignorance.
 

did you doubt the plan? (i did doubt it and still do but this is the kind of stuff that might actually make it happen)

But, to play devil's advocate: if Trump does implement his "50, 100, 200%" tarrifs, they will crash the US economy and place its future as the global hegemon in peril. A weaker US is the fastest path to Palestinian freedom of any kind.
 
Personally I don't believe the establishment dems (clintons, obamas, pelosi etc...) will ever relinquish any power to someone like Bernie, who wants to fix the system. They don't want to fix it, they want to keep it exactly as it is.

Well that stinks. Sooner or later someone with the similar goals as Trump and those behind him will take power. Someone named John Smith with Vivek's talents could eventually win and consolidate power in a way Trump doesn't even have desire to, let alone having a capability.

I know I am not speaking for myself only: Many Americans are sick of polished politicians and would rather things burn than go with a safe choice. DNC has a next move and they better make a winning move.
 
Sorry but Bernie wouldn't have beaten Trump/MAGA in 2016, he's too left-wing for the American public at large, in Europe he'd be considered a centrist edging to the left, in the US he's seen as a Socialist or outright Communist

Obama won on a "change" campaign and the main change was introducing universal healthcare. Michael Moore's "Sicko" was one of the most popular documentaries during that time. America was ready to go left and to continue to go left. DNC is and was a showstopper, not a reactionary effort from the right.
 
RFK :lol: It actually is going to be much worse than his first term, isn’t it?