I shouldn’t butHe wants a new 3 wood.

I shouldn’t butHe wants a new 3 wood.
To say feck you to the environmentalists. They're 'woke' and anything 'woke' must be destroyed. Of course the fact that the land will end up being bought by his billionaire buddies is a nice bonus. Get ready for more Trump golf coursesWhat’s the reasoning behind this one?
What’s the reasoning behind this one?
It seems like dark times ahead for the US.
Yeah actually that makes the most sense. He’s taking a wrecking ball to that country. He’s determined to bleed every cent he can for him and his mates in this term. A president should be doing everything that he can to help the people. But.. well it’s just disgusting and even more so that nobody can stop himErm, to get more wood? And also as a massive feck you to Canada as the US imports most of its wood from there. And of course, as usual with Trump, it's about the money $$$$$
The stupid part is the US national parks had a record year last year with over 331 MILLION visitors to them. That's almost the same size as the US population. Trump hasn't mentioned this though as part of Musk's clear out of federal employees they fired over 1000 park rangers and workers and a further 700 have handed in their notice.
Trump has signed the executive order basically giving a free for all as he's given the timber contracts to private lumber companies. I wonder what the kickbacks for that were? Again, he's a fecking piece of shit.
https://www.seattletimes.com/nation...trump-officials-appear-to-want-it-kept-quiet/
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...forest-clearings-foreign-timber-b2709110.html
https://www.ecowatch.com/trump-public-forests-private-logging.html
Don't worry, the Democratic politicians will show up to his next speech with two ribbons to fix everything.It will reach a boiling point eventually.
Whether it'll happen 3 months or 3 years from now, if they keep going down this road and doing everything possible to polarize the people more and more things will get very ugly. Maybe a full on civil war will be out of the question but at the very least there are going to be violent riots across the country between MAGA and its opposition where people will die. The way things are going I fear it's just a matter of when and not if.
I think the notion that post cold war Russia wasn't hostile to the US, that it was just the Soviet regime is misguided. Russia were forced to give up their influence, because they simply couldn't maintain control. It wasn't some sort of noble choice to set these countries free.Just to expand on my earlier reply Pogue:
![]()
That particular article was written in this delusionary period of politicians being convinced that the end of history was reached and all the countries will just want to become the bastion of freedom and democracy that US is.I think the notion that post cold war Russia wasn't hostile to the US, that it was just the Soviet regime is misguided. Russia were forced to give up their influence, because they simply couldn't maintain control. It wasn't some sort of noble choice to set these countries free.
The west, and the US in particular has always had this weird notion that everyone in the world secretly wants to be like them which in some circles has now created the notion that post cold war Russia would've become a western style democracy and poor Putin just wanted to be left alone, but was made hostile to the west again by NATO.
Putin had plenty of chances to move towards the west before his invasions. He didn't by choice, because he wants to restore the glory of the Russian empire. He was provoked in the sense that a bully is provoked into taking someone's lunch money, because their victim didn't hand it over by choice. You can of course argue that's how the world works and that it's natural selection, but that's an entirely different argument. Somehow "blaming" NATO and the west is rubbish.
Nice to see you ignored my post and question for the third time after I pointed out the reality of how Ukraine war occuredJust to expand on my earlier reply Pogue:
![]()
Possibly being less dependent on Canadian lumber?What’s the reasoning behind this one?
America first or somethingAfghan women who fled Taliban to study abroad face return after USAID freeze
More than 80 Afghan women who fled the Taliban to pursue higher education in Oman now face imminent deportation back to Afghanistan, following the Trump administration's sweeping freeze on foreign aid programmes.
Funded by the US Agency for International Development (USAID), their scholarships were abruptly terminated after a funding freeze ordered by President Donald Trump when he returned to office in January.
"It was heart-breaking," one student told the BBC, speaking anonymously for fear of reprisals. "Everyone was shocked and crying. We've been told we will be sent back within two weeks."
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cg4k25wlw21o
Much more of this to come, I imagine.
Putin wasn’t even in power when this piece was written. That’s changed things a tad, eh?Just to expand on my earlier reply Pogue:
![]()
Destroying the economy, decades long relationships with close allies and now the environment too. So much winning!
It will reach a boiling point eventually.
Whether it'll happen 3 months or 3 years from now, if they keep going down this road and doing everything possible to polarize the people more and more things will get very ugly. Maybe a full on civil war will be out of the question but at the very least there are going to be violent riots across the country between MAGA and its opposition where people will die. The way things are going I fear it's just a matter of when and not if.
Yeah…the hilariously deluded take that turned out to be very prescient.That's just hilariously deluded.
"If you ignore Transnistria and Abkhazia, Russia didn't want to invade anyone in the 90s. It totally started after NATO enlargement."
Also, I wonder why people quoting him today seem to skip over the part about their far advanced democracy. After all, this is an important part of reasoning.
As a measles outbreak spreads across West Texas, Dr. Ana Montanez is fighting an uphill battle to convince some parents that vitamin A - touted by vaccine critics as effective against the highly contagious virus - will not protect their children.
The 53-year-old pediatrician in the city of Lubbock is working overtime to contact vaccine-hesitant parents, explaining the grave risks posed by a disease that most American families have never seen in their lifetime - and one that can be prevented through immunization.
https://www.reuters.com/business/he...dy-vitamin-texas-measles-outbreak-2025-03-08/"I'm very concerned about the messaging that's coming out," said Dr. Jeffrey Kahn, chief of infectious diseases at Children's Health in Dallas. "It's somewhat baffling to me that we're relitigating the effectiveness of vaccines and alternative therapies. We know how to handle measles. We've had six decades of experience."
Jennifer Piggott proudly hung a red-and-blue Trump campaign flag outside her one-story home during the November election race. Now, after she was abruptly fired from her civil service job, her days of supporting the president are over. Piggott is among more than 125 people dismissed in February from the Treasury Department's Bureau of Fiscal Service in Parkersburg, West Virginia, unsettling a community that voted overwhelmingly for Republican President Donald Trump.
"Nobody that I've talked to understood the devastation that having this administration in office would do to our lives," Piggott, 47, told Reuters in an interview, saying she would not have supported Trump if she knew then what she knows now. "As much as I think that President Trump is doing wonderful things for the country in some regards, I don't understand this at all," she said.
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/doge-job-cuts-shake-trump-voting-west-virginia-town-2025-03-07/James, 42, said he too worries about making his mortgage payment and feeding his five children. At last week's rally he marched with a sign criticizing Musk and said he regretted voting for Trump. "They are pretty much just coming here, chopping heads off, without really doing their homework," James said. "He got elected president and he's doing a lot of things that people never even imagined that he was going to do to us."
The contrary also applies. The decision to expand NATO wasn’t taken as some sort of noble course to sustain the freedom of said countries. The main factor behind it was Russia’s weakness.I think the notion that post cold war Russia wasn't hostile to the US, that it was just the Soviet regime is misguided. Russia were forced to give up their influence, because they simply couldn't maintain control. It wasn't some sort of noble choice to set these countries free.
We simply don’t know how Russia would’ve evolved without this repeated provocation as they see it. It’s counter factual history at this point, but it’s pretty safe to assume it probably would’ve been better than it is now (if only a little bit).The west, and the US in particular has always had this weird notion that everyone in the world secretly wants to be like them which in some circles has now created the notion that post cold war Russia would've become a western style democracy and poor Putin just wanted to be left alone, but was made hostile to the west again by NATO.
NATO is America in Russian eyes, and is in effect in neutral eyes. That’s the point…it’s America by proxy.Putin had plenty of chances to move towards the west before his invasions. He didn't by choice, because he wants to restore the glory of the Russian empire. He was provoked in the sense that a bully is provoked into taking someone's lunch money, because their victim didn't hand it over by choice. You can of course argue that's how the world works and that it's natural selection, but that's an entirely different argument. Somehow "blaming" NATO and the west is rubbish.
Perhaps he mightn’t have been either?Putin wasn’t even in power when this piece was written. That’s changed things a tad, eh?
Prescient about what? That Russia was going to turn to oligarchy and get back to power projecting ways? That could be told by anyone with even slightest interest in the region in the 90s. His claim is that if it wasn't for NATO enlargement Russia would somehow be a bastion of liberal democracy, which was braindead even at that time.Yeah…the hilariously deluded take that turned out to be very prescient.
The reality is that if NATO hadn’t expanded its membership, Russia would likely have started their imperialist march through the former Soviet Union a lot earlier.Prescient about what? That Russia was going to turn to oligarchy and get back to power projecting ways? That could be told by anyone with even slightest interest in the region in the 90s. His claim is that if it wasn't for NATO enlargement Russia would somehow be a bastion of liberal democracy, which was braindead even at that time.
Something to celebrate with his mate Putinhttps://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cg70jylp32gt
Russian attack kills 20. President Trump will be pleased.
The main thing they shouldn’t have done over the past two decades was to encourage Ukrainian aspirations to join NATO.@Kinsella explain what the EU/US should have done differently up until the point Russia invades Crimea and Donbass?
Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia would for sure look completely different today. For the most part it also started a lot earlier too, it's just that in a lot of Western countries Belarus, Transnistria, Ukraine pre-2014 and Georgia are not seen as examples of Russian Imperialism, despite Belarus being probably the perfect model of how Putin expects to reabsorb a country.The reality is that if NATO hadn’t expanded its membership, Russia would likely have started their imperialist march through the former Soviet Union a lot earlier.
Explain that reasoning in detail. We're in for something really funny.Perhaps he mightn’t have been either?
Doctors push back as parents embrace Kennedy and vitamin A in Texas measles outbreak
https://www.reuters.com/business/he...dy-vitamin-texas-measles-outbreak-2025-03-08/
DOGE job cuts bring pain to Trump heartland
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/doge-job-cuts-shake-trump-voting-west-virginia-town-2025-03-07/
Putin had plenty of chances to move towards the west before his invasions. He didn't by choice, because he wants to restore the glory of the Russian empire. He was provoked in the sense that a bully is provoked into taking someone's lunch money, because their victim didn't hand it over by choice. You can of course argue that's how the world works and that it's natural selection, but that's an entirely different argument. Somehow "blaming" NATO and the west is rubbish.
Nothing screams moving towards west like murdering journalists, political opposition, poisoning a presidential candidate or destabilising neighboring countries.He definitely did! Up until ~2007.
He’s definitely up Russias arse. Doesn’t give a toss about Ukraine.
He's also desperate to be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. That Leavit woman thinks he deserves alreadyI suppose there are two ways of looking at this.
1. He's going out of his way to help Putin by slowly removing US support for Ukraine to facilitate a ceasefire that is favorable to Putin, so he can then reset relations and start doing business with Russia (Venal, Predatory).
2. He desperately wants to make a deal and take credit for it and is convinced he has more leverage over Zelenskyy than Putin to capitulate to ceasefire terms. (Transactional, Art of the Deal - esque)
There's probably a combination of both at work imo.
It’s counter factual history at this point. If he had come to power regardless, would he (and Russia) have pursued the exact same course as he has?Explain that reasoning in detail. We're in for something really funny.
Can it even come back? Isn't it eradicated in the form we know it?Just wait until smallpox comes back.
Boo fecking hoo! That's just so typical of the selfish attitude of so many voters. If they still had their jobs they wouldn't give a flying feck about other people losing their jobs, and you know damn well they would be supporting everything else he's doing and proudly claiming he's their President and he's doing exactly what they voted for him to do.
Me, myself and I. I'm alright Jack, feck everyone else.
The chickens have come home to roost for more than a few Trump supporters since he was elected and to make matters worse those chickens are laying eggs worth their weight in gold so they can't afford to buy them.
As I said in an earlier post, Trump is slowly losing support among some supporters. The more he carries on like this and the worse the economy gets and the more jobs get lost, the more support he's going to lose.
He hates criticism or pushback so we can only hope people voice their opinions in the streets and (as I said earlier) the press start to unite and hold him to account for things like this. We know he watches news channels 24/7 and loves his polls, so if the tide turns against him he will definitely know about it and won't be happy at all. The question is, how will he react if it does continue to turn?
Putin has hinted that Ukraine is a fake country and his ideas on Ukraine eventually culminated in the 2021 essay.It’s counter factual history at this point. If he had come to power regardless, would he (and Russia) have pursued the exact same course as he has?