Kinsella
Copy & Paste Merchant
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2012
- Messages
- 3,451
You can reply to someone else there mate. It’s become tedious now.So, apparently, you think the Treaty of Versailles was better. Why?
You can reply to someone else there mate. It’s become tedious now.So, apparently, you think the Treaty of Versailles was better. Why?
'I never thought the leopards would eat my face!',He will find a reason to vote again for Trump (or Vance) in 4 years.
You can reply to someone else there mate. It’s become tedious now.
You claimed the Treaty of Versailles was far too lenient.Hold on, you accuse me of wanting more Hitlers, and now "it's become tedious" because I responded to you?
I mentioned in the 2026 WC Cup that exactly this kind of craziness would happen (and that Trump might want for the US to have it alone). Some people didn't take it very well.He just doesn't have a fecking clue. First time it's been held in this part of the world? The USA hosted it in 1994 and Mexico hosted it twice previously in 1970 and 1986. They will become the first country to host it three times when they hold matches there next summer. Completely clueless and always wanting to take credit for everything and anything. It's just so fecking pathetic.
They rigged the election and I became PresidentI think he definitely mispoke there. I know what he was getting at but he rambles so much he came out with a very incriminating statement whilst yet again proving he can't let anything go and was trying to dig at the Democrats. Any excuse. It's so nauseating and petty.
Tensions are a good thing and will make it more exciting (when asked about the issues between the USA, Mexico and Canada causing problems with the joint hosting of the World Cup)
Honestly, what the actual feck?
Another clown show ending with refusal to answer questions and him scraping his signature and then showing it off to everyone like it's some major achievement. A fecking world cup task force.Complete and utter bollocks.
The way he's going we might not even have a world cup next year anyway. Be funny if everyone boycotted it and demanded the matches are in just Canada and Mexico.![]()
You are completely missing the point where the Marshall plan was put in place hand in hand with the Potsdam agreement which led the the full demilitarization of Germany and oversight of German military affairs. The Treaty of Versailles was a half measure that was somewhat punitive but had no real enforcement or oversight provisions. A harsher ToV, like the Potsdam Agreement, coupled with a Marshall plan like investment (kind of like the Dawes and Young plans) would have been far better.You claimed the Treaty of Versailles was far too lenient.
The Treaty of Versailles led to significant resentment in Germany after WWI, contributing significantly to the rise of extremist parties, i.e. the Nazis! Whilst the Marshall Plan paved the way for significant and rapid economic recovery, not just in Germany but in Western Europe.
I mentioned in the 2026 WC Cup that exactly this kind of craziness would happen (and that Trump might want for the US to have it alone). Some people didn't take it very well.
DOGE job cuts bring pain to Trump heartland
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/doge-job-cuts-shake-trump-voting-west-virginia-town-2025-03-07/
You could argue that WWI happened because of alliances, though not a single one
I know that and you know that, but apparently not everyone subscribes to that viewGiven "the alliance system" is commonly acknowledged as one of the main causes of WW1, you definitely could, yeah.
Somewhat punitive.
———————
Look we’ll leave it there anyway.
True, the island in the Med didn't work.History has also shown that certain megalomaniacs need to be placed as far away as possible and be kept under guard at all times. Preferably an isolated island in the Atlantic. If you don't, they just come back.
True, the island in the Med didn't work.
It’s spamming the thread at this point. People can read over that particular exchange and come to their own conclusions.No, "you'll" lever it there anyway as opposed to actually addressing the point.
Run off then.
feck those people.
They’re happy to vote for other people to get screwed, but it happening to them is unconscionable.
Selfish cnuts.
You could argue that WWI happened because of alliances, though not a single one
Germany declared war on Russia because of Russia's support of Serbia which Russia did not have an alliance with, that is how it started, Britain joined becase it guaranteed Belgian neutrality that Germany ignored, though because of the treaty with France they would have entered anyway because the purpose of Germany ignoring Belgian neutrality was to do an end run to defeat France quickly so the could concentrate on RussiaBut in a totally different way, allies obliged to join a war, not someone starting a war with a country because totally separate countries have an alliance.
No they can't, cause you didn't actually explain anything. You jumped on @WI_Red (because his comments were easiest to respond to?), but didn't respond to anything else. In particular, I still have no idea why you brought up the Treaty of Versailles in the first place:It’s spamming the thread at this point. People can read over that particular exchange and come to their own conclusions.
Wait, why is this relevant? Are you comparing what happened to the USSR in the 1990s to the Treaty of Versailles? Or to Russia's subsequent geopolitical situation? How are those situations similar?
double feck those peoplefeck those people.
They’re happy to vote for other people to get screwed, but it happening to them is unconscionable.
Selfish cnuts.
As it says in the comments, he probably means that it was rigged in 2020 but he won anyway in 2024, or that it was rigged in 2024 and he won regardless.
I read the exchange. In some ways I almost hope you’re a WUM, because otherwise I’d probably just feel sorry for you with how disassociated your view of yourself is to how it’s perceived in reality.It’s spamming the thread at this point. People can read over that particular exchange and come to their own conclusions.
![]()
Germany declared war on Russia because of Russia's support of Serbia which Russia did not have an alliance with, that is how it started, Britain joined becase it guaranteed Belgian neutrality that Germany ignored, though because of the treaty with France they would have entered anyway because the purpose of Germany ignoring Belgian neutrality was to do an end run to defeat France quickly so the could concentrate on Russia
Something to celebrate with his mate Putin
Yes exactly. Both Trump and his new best friend the war criminal Putin don't give a sh1t about those who get killed or injured.
It is just all about themselves.
I would have thought that most clear thinking Americans will be absolutely ashamed of their leader.... but maybe not.
That’s not quite true actually, Germany declared war on Russia because it declared war on Austrian-Hungarian empire for invading Serbia. It was all engineered by Germany for encouraging Austria-Hungary to attack Serbia.Germany declared war on Russia because of Russia's support of Serbia which Russia did not have an alliance with, that is how it started, Britain joined becase it guaranteed Belgian neutrality that Germany ignored, though because of the treaty with France they would have entered anyway because the purpose of Germany ignoring Belgian neutrality was to do an end run to defeat France quickly so the could concentrate on Russia
I don't think there is much that would sway some of his cult away, they could invade Canada and millions would follow along pushing rhetoric like Canadian Nazis and they wouldn't blink.
It reminds me of some of the stories in Ukraine, where civilians with family in Russia tried to tell them about what was happening and in many cases the response was either denial or it needs to happen.
I'm sure there was one example where a woman sent photos of her bombed out apartment to Russian relatives and it was downplayed/defended, despite them visiting in the past.