Yeah, "no evidence". Not related. As I said, pretty naive.
The Trump Presidency | Biden Inaugurated
- Thread starter Raoul
- Start date
- Status
Yeah, "no evidence". Not related. As I said, pretty naive.
So Ivanka gets a cabinet position.
White, male, cis-heterosexual baby bloomers!
I can see why we lose. Blaming everyone who is a bit darker skinned is a lot simpler.
Nothing that anyone has been able to show, and yet people keep bringing this up in this same way, as if the question itself proves some kind of corruption.
Majority of white women voted for Trump.
I'm aware and heartbroken.
**Triggered**
Very much so.
Can this be said again please? Why is this so hard to understand?
I'm tired of people dismissing Trumps racism, sexism, bigotry etc. Or trying to play down their own potential subconscious thoughts just to make themselves feel better, because they're "fed up of people calling them racist" (newsflash: stop saying racist things, and you wont get called racist)
The man is disgusting, and supporting him is an acceptance of everything he stands for, including racism. So by proxy, you are supporting this.
So because one thing happens after another it's caused by it? There's no evidence those things are related. Would those arms deals have not happened under someone else's watch? Of course they would.
Well didn't see that coming market took a hit after the news as well.
I thought Hillary had it shoe in, what the hell happened?
I thought Hillary had it shoe in, what the hell happened?
You're just expressing the exact issue, that any concerns about immigration are instantly perceived as racist. They were built on issues of jobs, security, changing communities, illegal immigration. They may have been sold partly through racist language from UKIP for instance but if someone cared about those issues no way were they going to vote remain because of the presentation of it all.
Your statement of them being racist or at least condoning it is built around the idea that if they weren't they'd never vote Trump out of principle. Thats a big leap to expect people to abandon issues they want changing.
Any stats on gender votes?
Not what I wanted to hear, but thanks for the response. As for your last bit, people do say all sorts of things during a campaign, remains to be seen how much of it was to win votes and how much of it he actually believes in.
I can honestly see Kanye doing two terms, followed by Kim Kardashian and in 2032 when people realise how fecked the country has become they'll see sense and elect Corey Feldman to steady the ship.
I'm struggling to understand why. I know women, traditionally, tended to vote more conservative. But that trend is changing and, as far as I'm aware, in recent elections more women voted for Democrats than men in the US.
How could Donald fecking Trump reverse that particular trend? What did he offer to WOMEN? Is it that it was never white women who were responsible for the trend? Or what?
Well you may believe they are unrelated, I do not. There's zero, ZERO, reason for Saudi Arabia to donate money for altruistic reasons. Hillary should have never accepted the money in the first place because of her interest in the situation. Now let's agree to disagree, I'm just saying there are numerous reasons she could be seen as a bad choice for presidency.
Remember the derivative crisis in the banking world (which still isn't fully resolved by the way, hint, hint, hint, for your next investments/bets)? Triple AAA is what Moody's and Standard & Poor's called that shite ffs
What?! I remember going quickly over her history some time back seeing as she was being quite active during the campaign, isn't she mainly a fashion businesswoman or something?
If you're trying to make some kind of point you're going about it in a really bad way.
They gave donations and then Clinton is personally making their deal a top priority.
Whether the deal would have happened or not, makes no difference, they gave the donations for such influence.
Or lets just say that the Saudis donated said moneys just because they wanted to help the CF... yeah right
That he can grab them by their pussy.
So, that's a somewhat shady deal of a charity foundation vs Trump's "Let's slaughter the entire family of every terrorist".
By all means, scrutinize Hillary for every single cent but then don't forget that Trump flat out refused to show his tax returns.
He wasn't Hilary Clinton...
It depends on more who is backing them up in the background, which inevitably would steer his reign, which is especially valid in the States. Just too many interests on stake.
They simply weren't as bothered by the misogyny as we thought they would. They didn't care as much. Hell, plenty of them would wanna be Melania Trump right now. Do feck all, just be pretty and end up in the White House.
Thing is, that's still no reason to vote for him. That's just a reason not to vote for his opponent. But what is it that made the majority of white women decide he would be the better president? It would warrant an extensive study.
I don't think its to make a case for Trump, but it does explain why many just don't trust Hilary which is why she was just such a poor candidate IMO. She is unelectable and this was known before this whole thing even started.
The issue was that everyone thought that Trump was more un-electable , and they were proven wrong.
Hillary slaughtered many families during her time in office. I'm happy to scrutinize both of them, I think they are the worst candidates in U.S. history and the outcome is disturbing. My problem is people who seem to make it a choice of one, either vote Hillary or you are a racist, sexist, and terrible human being. I see them both as awful!
Yeah it's odd. Perhaps their husbands voted Trump and therefore they did too? Or they vote Republican anyway whoever the nominee is?
And now Trump must govern. He will be in the same position Obama was in when he took office in 2008. How much of his platform will a GOP controlled government accomplish before 2018?
Women dislike women?
Trump is a racist, sexist, terrible human being. If someone actively helps him get the most important job in the world... well...
Thats also a fair point, not all women think or have the mind set that women should be in power.
No, it's either vote Hillary or you vote for a racist, sexist and terrible human being.
I was annoyed, throughout the campaign, by the purported equivalency of the two candidates. Trump is orders of magnitude worse and yet he got away with everything. The only conclusion here is that competence, transparency, honesty, integrity etc. doesn't count at all: if you say what the voters want to hear, you'll win, regardless of anything else you might be saying. They just won't care about those things.
Way too simplistic and stereotypical.
aye. Both terrible candidates. Romney was better and really is Hillary the best democrats can do?
People around him say he is like that normally in he´s business decision making. I hope he isn´t like how they say he is though for the Americans sake.
- Status