WI_Red
Redcafes Most Rested
I've been having a great time on my right wing Dutch forum asking people why they're so upset Twitter has so much power.
Usually they all applaud Trump for this record level of regulation cuts. No more red tape for honest capitalist entrepeneurs who are realizing their American dream. No more big government. A baker should be able to deny service to a gay couple, because that is their God given right as a business owner. So why is this different?
The first argument is usually FREEDUM OF SPEECH. Yes, that's between the government and its people and while Jack and Mark are very rich, they're neither a nation nor a government.
The second is usually, it should be classed as a utility company, because they have a lot of power! Ok, but they're not and this effectively means you want more government control. So you are a bit of a socialist? I voted for the Socialist party in the last election, welcome aboard comrade! (this angers them greatly)
After that it's usually, stuff like you brainwashed MSM communist traitor, tell me where you live and you can say it to my face.
I usually end it with Facts don't care about your feelings.
I'm so edgy, I know.
As I'm not that versed in American politics, I'd like to know, a libertarian should be in support of Twitter having absolute control of who says what on their platform right?
I mean I guess. The Libertarian platform is a hot mess, On "principle" I guess it can be boiled down to "do whatever you want, just try not to break stuff or hurt others"