TheReligion
Abusive
Trump is at war with Twitter and fake news, the two platforms that helped him get where he is.
The irony huh? This guy can't get another term surely.
Trump is at war with Twitter and fake news, the two platforms that helped him get where he is.
Did he really use the word malfeasance in that speech?
Zero chance he knew beforehand what this word means........
Come on jack just ban him from Twitter I want to see what happens.
Narcissism. When they see the blame waves coming, along with a lot of questions about their responsibility for the things they said or have done; they deflect then slink off to a corner to nurse their wounds. He knew those reporters were there to bombard him about his "shooting starts" tweet, along with his terrible job at managing the pandemic. Right now, with the violence in Minneapolis, a pandemic, high unemployment, a stock market that could tank at anytime; he really doesn't want to face the cameras. His safe space right now is Twitter and that is now becoming a problem for him. He also knows that he's behind in the polls and the Presidency is the only thing keeping him out of a possible prison term.
Nonetheless, Trump is doing what he must do to keep his core base of supporters happy. They're all he has at the moment.
And I must say that Angelina was very good in that, not nasty at all.'Nobody knows more about mal...whatever...than me!'
I can’t wait for someone to leak his teleprompter wording all spelt phonetically.
Mal fess ants
'Nobody would like to know more about Angelina than me...*sob*'And I must say that Angelina was very good in that, not nasty at all.
They’re really bad ants, the worst kind of ants, I spoke to the pest control guys and they couldn’t believe how much I knew about these ants.
Do you mean his last tweet? Yes, 7 shot by unknown shooter, 1 critical. It was at protests for the Louisville shooting, the one where a black woman was killed by officers serving a no-knock warrant at night to the wrong person.It definitely did.
Can anyone clear this latest post up? Who has bee shot and by whom?
Is it civilian on civilian that he is referencing here
FFS I spelled fees wrong
I was too busy laughing at my own ants joke to notice
Yay!I enjoyed the "Forfar 4 East Fife 5" bit.
This guy has documented lazy, biased, and politically motivated "fact-checking" by the WaPo fact checker (nominated for a Pulitzer) , speficially on M4A and also other things.
https://medium.com/@MattBruenig/my-favorite-glenn-kessler-feck-up-791f27404ee4
https://theintercept.com/2019/09/07/glenn-kessler-fact-checker-washington-post-pulitzer/
He also had a podcast where he talked about trying to get one of those checks corrected and how it's impossible.
I really want him to bite and get into a twitter beef with T-Swizzle while Covid and riots run rampant.
This is why I sort of agree with Zuckerberg's take on this. I know everyone right now sees thing via the prism of Trump vs X but what Zuckerberg said actually did make sense that such social media platforms should stay neutral in the sense that any such actions on basis of political takes can never be objective. It is easy to cheer on twitter censoring Trump now but it is also easy to imagine big tech colluding with Govt to use similar measures to censor free speech that is against the Govt. I know per US laws Private companies probably do have rights to do as they wish but I don't think this is. a good precedent.
Even ignoring the same, why would not the general populace of the country want to hear whatever their democratically President has to say? I am not a believer in head of states acquiring special status but in case of communications, they should never be censored despite how vile their views are. People should have the right to know what their elected leader actually thinks or believes in.
Taylor Swift's fan base is even more rabid than the Trump lot. This is a feud I have time for.
She's one of the few people with more followers too.Taylor Swift's fan base is even more rabid than the Trump lot. This is a feud I have time for.
Nobody is censoring Trump ffs
Fair but ask from several liberal circles is to ban him from the twitter.
Yes you are completely correct, I didn’t consider thatI'm sure he's familiar with the term corporate malfeasance. Very familiar, no doubt.
"Nobody knows more about corporate malfeasance than me, believe me!"I'm sure he's familiar with the term corporate malfeasance. Very familiar, no doubt.
Yeah but he's the President. Minneapolis has been in meltdown the last 3 days. He's the leader of the country. To not even acknowledge it after tweeting about it non stop is just unfathomable.
He can't even be sincere with any conviction. He's being grilled about it now and says he spoke to Floyd's family after the China announcement but was very vague.Trump at this time is trying to save himself, that is, not lose in November. Narcissists couldn't care less about what's going on with you. Trump would let 2 million people die of COVID19, hundreds of people shot in Minneapolis, if it meant he'd win in November. NPD is a serious mental health condition of which Trump is a textbook case. There's no event or him being the President (of which he knows) could change his overall thought process right now...Win in November. One black dude dying in the streets at the hand of a police officer is nothing to him.
Fair but ask from several liberal circles is to ban him from the twitter.
Zuckerberg's take is correct. But this is Trump we are talking about. He is a massive cnut. So we all should allow it.This is why I sort of agree with Zuckerberg's take on this. I know everyone right now sees thing via the prism of Trump vs X but what Zuckerberg said actually did make sense that such social media platforms should stay neutral in the sense that any such actions on basis of political takes can never be objective. It is easy to cheer on twitter censoring Trump now but it is also easy to imagine big tech colluding with Govt to use similar measures to censor free speech that is against the Govt. I know per US laws Private companies probably do have rights to do as they wish but I don't think this is. a good precedent.
Even ignoring the same, why would not the general populace of the country want to hear whatever their democratically President has to say? I am not a believer in head of states acquiring special status but in case of communications, they should never be censored despite how vile their views are. People should have the right to know what their elected leader actually thinks or believes in.
I'm not sure that's true.Hardly several. No one wants to ban Trump from Twitter but him spewing lies about mail in ballots should have been checked.
Oh and ffs don't ban him from Twitter. If this cnut had to do something else with that time he would probably cause more problems than he already has.
I really want him to bite and get into a twitter beef with T-Swizzle while Covid and riots run rampant.
Imagine this clown and his circus Cabinet discussing the WHO. It'd be like that 'What's your vector, Victor?' scene from Airplane!
Now there's a reference!He might go Ace Rothstein in Casino and have his own talk show live from the Oval Office.
Maybe you are. With everything thata going on, How do you know the difference anymore?I picked the wrong week to stop sniffing glue
No one wants to ban Trump from Twitter? Da fuq?Hardly several. No one wants to ban Trump from Twitter but him spewing lies about mail in ballots should have been checked.