Red Defence
Full Member
Yep.A big fat nothing burger, then.
Yep.A big fat nothing burger, then.
It’s also going to be up to the media to inform the public in a serious manner. Up to now they’ve failed and just seem to treat everything as one big drama and entertainment show. Ratings would improve if they pulled their socks up and got on with it.If the Dems can just nail the messaging, it should be pretty damaging imo.
It's this. Just like the Mueller report, but in a much-reduced timescale. We know what he did was impeachable, we know what he did was obstruction we know what he did would get any other President chucked out but because it took place in such a way and because the cult runs strong, we did nothing about it.
I'm not sure that works in just a week. It's hard to get people to adjust to the mentality that it's okay for a President to extort political favours from an ally by withholding aid he has no constitutional right to withhold.
If the Dems can just nail the messaging, it should be pretty damaging imo.
Have a look at the Donald subreddit and other right wing site comments, it is absolutely depressing to see what they believe. They are calling Trump a hero who should be given some military star for trying to expose corruption at the highest level. There is nothing Trump can do that the GOP won't defend. I don't think there is any hope for the USA unless demographics shift in the red States.It's this. Just like the Mueller report, but in a much-reduced timescale. We know what he did was impeachable, we know what he did was obstruction we know what he did would get any other President chucked out but because it took place in such a way and because the cult runs strong, we did nothing about it.
I'm not sure that works in just a week. It's hard to get people to adjust to the mentality that it's okay for a President to extort political favours from an ally by withholding aid he has no constitutional right to withhold.
If the Dems can just nail the messaging, it should be pretty damaging imo.
Ok grab ya popcorn now.
Ok grab ya popcorn now.
A big fat nothing burger, then.
Could be, but he can just tell them to sod off.@Red Defence this could be the catch you're looking for
It'll be over soon. Once the complaint and the call transcripts are out, this should be resolved. Or go to SC debating text vs context.
Don't tweet that! Don't touch there!Panda
The only involvement SCOTUS has in impeachment is Roberts would preside over the trial in the Senate.
The issue now is getting the whistleblower complaint, much more than the transcript. The transcript will probably be fairly unclear, otherwise I can't imagine they'd let him release it.
Not necessarily from the very beginning of the complaint being lodged but they almost certainly would have had more time to prepare how to respond to it than the House or anyone else did. I can't imagine that kind of information to escape the apparatus surrounding (any) POTUS.
Something seems funny with whats been going on. Trump and GOP leadership are acting transparently on this.
This same WH has been hamstringing congressional committees frequently by refusing to hand over documents, invoking bogus executive privilege on witnesses and using time wasting tactics by taking things to the courts.
Why would they start to act all transparent and open now?
Eh, by announcing they're moving forward with it, it gives the committees grounds to tell the courts and agencies they're demanding information from that it's a part of an impeachment inquiry, which carries more weight and expedites legal battles. Instead of Nadler sorta pussyfooting around it. It gives them standing to get grand jury materials, etc. that they couldn't get before.
Presumably the WH and senior republicans have discussed the substance of the complaint, got experts to review it, and have confirmed that it's "only" the president acting with "questionable" ethics but that the damage will be fairly minimal. If it will come out eventually anyway, the perception of being obstructionist will go more widely than just the president so the cumulative damage could be best minimised by acting with a degree of transparency and an air of bipartisanship.
His speech at the UN was a disgrace.
Surprised you are not defending this dictator.Trump doesnt need to be impeached. He just need to stand trial and grilled.
Did you order the code red? You're goddamn right i did.
I think the WH could also be trying to take the steam out of the impeachment inquiry with its garbled transcript before releasing the more damaging whistleblower complaint after they've caught major headlines of "No quid pro quo," which isn't the standard for impeachment but is the one that the WH and GOP are trying to move the goalposts towards. I would be surprised if they release the complaint the same day as the transcript.
For Senate Republicans, I don't think there's any feasible justification they could use for obstructing the request for the whistleblower report. I think even Devin Nunes signed off on Schiff's letter demanding it. Based on the new reporting by the Post, it seems like lots of the complaint will tie into the pattern of behavior of Trump, Giuliani, and other officials in circumventing normal channels to carry out a secondary Ukraine policy intent on manufacturing dirt on Biden. Trump has pissed off John Bolton and others recently, who may have axes to grind over their treatment.
If there isn't explicit quid pro quo, which there won't be, I can see the GOP saying essentially it's wrong but not impeachable at most. If they find out Giuliani threatened repercussions on behalf of Trump, they'll throw Rudy under the bus unless there's damning evidence of Trump directing him to use the leverage of the money.
Regardless of whether there's quid pro quo, this is worse than anything Nixon did. Nixon at least used campaign resources to try to dig up dirt on his opponents. Trump used the office of the president and all of its powers to try to gain an advantage on a political adversary.