The Trump Presidency | Biden Inaugurated

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm surprised someone with the best words feels the need to save them.
 
"Trumpy just pawn in game of life..."
 


d79fc23cca28aca98b2a681e0c6f1d6cb43fd245.jpg
 


Unfortunately she’s probably right. From a tactical long term point of view for the Democrats, it’s much better for Trump to be exposed for what he is and for the Democrats to use it to energise their base and independents so Trump, the GOP and all the poisonous ideologies they stand for can be defeated at the polls.

If they rushed into impeachment, it will energise the GOP/Trump base who will be looking for someone to finish their business in 2020/24. Step forward Coulter/Jr/Ivanka and the cycle continues.

I think they are currently going about it the right way. Trump and his GOP cronies are being crippled by investigations into countless cupboards chock full of skeletons. If they can lead this up to 2020, expose the crimes and how complicit the GOP are in all of it, then along with exposing how cruel the GOP agenda really is, they should be able to really damage them at the polls and start rebuilding the country.
 
It could backfire the Dems so i get it, but what if he is found guilty?
He can't be found guilty because he can't be charged with anything, as per existing DOJ guidelines.
Impeachment is entirely a political operation. It's tough to hear but until Trump is political damaged goods, he won't be impeached and it would be risky for Dems to try.
 
He can't be found guilty because he can't be charged with anything, as per existing DOJ guidelines.
Impeachment is entirely a political operation. It's tough to hear but until Trump is political damaged goods, he won't be impeached and it would be risky for Dems to try.
Fair enough. Didn't know how it worked, so it is better for the Dems to espose him as inept to run a country.
 
If the GOP were actual good human beings it would make sense, but Trump could probably eat a baby on a Twitter livestream and McConnell wouldn't let them vote for impeaching him.

Then Trump plays the woe is me card because the 'house' (read: McConnell) didn't impeach him, and those mean Dems wasted sooo much time and money.

On the other hand if Mueller recommends the DoJ indict Trump - which he'd only do if he's confident a successful criminal case could be brought forward - then the GOP really don't have any choice. I believe it's unlikely given how long it's gone on, as if Mueller had a smoking gun presumably he wouldn't let a criminal still be in charge.
 


Yup he really Tweeted that.


And this....
All fine and dandy until you're pilot commits suicide by flying in to mountain, or puts it down in the middle of the Indian Ocean or stays up for three days and drops her un the Atlantic of the coast of Brazil.
But all that means nothing when you're pal can just blow them out of the sky and blame anyone he wants. What a fecking wanker this guy is.




Wow....



:lol:
 
The fact that the POTUS is getting his knowledge from Fox and Friends is truly frightening.
 
Seems he was actually a co-founder based on the replies

From what I can tell, he was indeed in the group that formed the organization and went on to become president of Greenpeace Canada. Since then, though, he’s spent time lobbying for increased use of nuclear energy and for an asian logging firm. One that’s apparently guilty of massive illegal deforestation.
 
Seems he was actually a co-founder based on the replies
From what I can tell, he was indeed in the group that formed the organization and went on to become president of Greenpeace Canada. Since then, though, he’s spent time lobbying for increased use of nuclear energy and for an asian logging firm. One that’s apparently guilty of massive illegal deforestation.

Well he wasn't a co-founder at all. He joined in 1971 a year after it was started. He's a fecking moron and a dangerous one at that.
 
Well he wasn't a co-founder at all. He joined in 1971 a year after it was started. He's a fecking moron and a dangerous one at that.

It seems you’re right and I mis-read his wikipedia page. Either way, he appears to be the embodiment of a corporate sellout. Which of course would make him eligible for being cited in a tweet by Trump.
 
It seems you’re right and I mis-read his wikipedia page. Either way, he appears to be the embodiment of a corporate sellout. Which of course would make him eligible for being cited in a tweet by Trump.

Definitely. You are correct that he was head of Greenpeace Canada for 5 years, but since then he's been a paid lobbyist who shills for fossil fuel companies and nuclear firms. He spouts dangerous bullshit (like his C02 comments) and causes Greenpeace no end of problems with his constant lies about being a co-founder.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.