The Trump Presidency | Biden Inaugurated

Status
Not open for further replies.
One explanation might be that both in Michigan and Wisconsin, Sanders had won in the primaries. Perhaps a lot of his voters were really angry with Hillary and what happened in the Democratic primaries, so they didn't go to vote.
 
Barack Obama bans oil and gas drilling in most of Arctic and Atlantic oceans


Obama uses law that allows presidents to block sale of new offshore drilling and mining rights and makes it difficult for their successors to reverse decision



This actually has pissed me off completely. Didn't do this despite continuous pressure for 8 years, now, 1 month away from seeing the tiny positives of his climate legacy being torn to shreds, he shows the kinds of things he could have done.
Anyway, whatever, good that it happened, though there's also this
Few energy companies have expressed a wish to drill any time soon off the coasts thanks to abundant cheap shale oil in North Dakota and Texas. Exploratory drilling in the Arctic is costly and risky.


Pleasantly surprised by Trudeau
Justin Trudeau, who also put a moratorium on new oil and gas leasing in its Arctic waters, subject to periodic review.
 
The minister, who asked to remain anonymous, said Netanyahu’s great expectations of Trump stemmed from what Mossad chief Yossi Cohen and acting National Security Adviser Jacob Nagel heard from Michael Flynn, whom Trump has nominated as his national security adviser. Both men met with Flynn in the United States earlier this month.
Since then, Netanyahu has said repeatedly that their meeting with Flynn was excellent, and that what they heard from him constituted a “turning point” in American foreign policy in general, and toward Israel and the broader Middle East in particular, the minister said.
“There’s an opportunity here,” the minister quoted Netanyahu as saying. “We can effect historic changes.”

On the Palestinian issue, for instance, Netanyahu has said he wants to work with Trump to advance a two-state solution; Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman has said he wants to revive the understandings reached between former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and former President George W. Bush, which would legitimize construction in the major settlement blocs but freeze it outside the blocs; and Education Minister Naftali Bennett wants to take the two-state solution off the table entirely.

A few days ago, for instance, Transportation and Intelligence Minister Yisrael Katz said Israel should use the Trump presidency to obtain American recognition of its annexation of the Golan Heights. The next day, Lieberman rejected this idea, saying Israel’s main interest was getting rid of Syrian President Bashar Assad, whom he termed a “butcher” and a “murderer.”

read more: http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-1.760170
 
But on Friday just hours after the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, Maryland’s Rep. Elijah Cummings, called for a subpoena of the Republican governor of Michigan responsible for appointing the emergency manager who had switched Flint’s water supply, Chaffetz announced he was ending the congressional investigation. Chaffetz said he had concluded that “a series of failures at all levels of government caused, and then exacerbated, the water crisis.”

Arguing that “the federal regulatory framework is so outdated that it sets up states to fail,” Chaffetz called for EPA funds designated for use for studying and combatting climate change be redirected to water pipe improvement projects across the nation. Chaffetz also called for removing the requirement that federally funded drinking-water construction projects pay prevailing wages under the Davis Bacon Act.

Under Chaffetz’ chairmanship, the Republican-led House Oversight Committee has chased the Planned Parenthood hoax, sought to impeach the IRS commissioner over the agency’s scrutiny of Tea Party-affiliated groups that sought tax-exempt status and vowed to continue investigating Hillary Clinton over her use of a private email server even after the election.


http://www.salon.com/2016/12/19/hou...on-into-flint-water-crisis-blame-epa-instead/
 
Donald Trump on tape saying 'every racist thing ever', claims actor Tom Arnold

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/dec/20/donald-trump-apprentice-outtakes-tape-tom-arnold
I was convinced this alleged tape would be released a few days before and would have finished him. I'm not so sure now. The people who voted for him couldn't care less what he says and does. They are almost proud of it. Im believing he could get away with shooting someone in the street. He landed on "take a chance" and got the elusive "infinite get out of jail free card".
 
I was convinced this alleged tape would be released a few days before and would have finished him. I'm not so sure now. The people who voted for him couldn't care less what he says and does. They are almost proud of it. Im believing he could get away with shooting someone in the street. He landed on "take a chance" and got the elusive "infinite get out of jail free card".

he did not release it because of a confidentiality clause and the expectation that Trump would lose.

FFS. So depressing the way leaks that helped Trump's cause had absolutely no problem getting in the public domain yet stuff like this didn't. The whole wikileaks etc transparency thing didn't exactly level the playing field, did it?
 
FFS. So depressing the way leaks that helped Trump's cause had absolutely no problem getting in the public domain yet stuff like this didn't. The whole wikileaks etc transparency thing didn't exactly level the playing field, did it?

The people with the tapes should have sent them to the Intercept or Wikileaks; I know Greenwald and others help whistleblowers learn how to cover their tracks online.
 
The people with the tapes should have sent them to the Intercept or Wikileaks; I know Greenwald and others help whistleblowers learn how to cover their tracks online.

Exactly. I just think people in the opposite camp to Trump are more likely to respect the privacy of anyone they might have some dirt on. Hence these transparency sites are biased as hell.
 
Exactly. I just think people in the opposite camp to Trump are more likely to respect the privacy of anyone they might have some dirt on. Hence these transparency sites are biased as hell.

The Intercept, which is (IMO) the best of the lot, has done a ton of digging on Trump's dodgy dealings, his associates,, and his doublespeak on donations and the Goldman Sachs-types filling his cabinet. And they've been pursuing this line of attack for months not only after the elections (when the focus has shifted to his COI rather than his personality).


For example, their current headlines include:
IBM EMPLOYEES LAUNCH PETITION PROTESTING COOPERATION WITH DONALD TRUMP
Wells Fargo Is on a Losing Streak, But Still Has Some Trump Cards
IF YOU WANT TO SEE HOW DONALD TRUMP WILL DESTROY THE ENVIRONMENT, READ THIS LEGISLATIVE ROADMAP
Apple, Google and Others at Trump Tech Summit Have Stashed $560 Billion in Profits Overseas
If Donald Trump Is So Upset About Iraq WMD Lies, Why Would He Want to Hire John Bolton?
FACEBOOK FINALLY SAYS IT WILL NOT HELP BUILD MUSLIM REGISTRY
TRUMP’S PICK FOR INTERIOR SECRETARY WAS CAUGHT IN “PATTERN OF FRAUD” AT SEAL TEAM 6
Factory Near Carrier Sends Jobs to Mexico, But Trump Just Tweets

Just follow the work of Lee Fang, who drudged up tons of shit on all candidates.

Finally, I don't think people involved in the actual Clinton campaign are anything short of the ruthless standard required at the sharp end of political campaigning.


Edit: On successive days in October:
Donald Trump Lashes Out at Foreign-Lobbyist Donations, Despite Accepting Them
Hacked Emails Prove Coordination Between Clinton Campaign and Super PACs
 
The Intercept, which is (IMO) the best of the lot, has done a ton of digging on Trump's dodgy dealings, his associates,, and his doublespeak on donations and the Goldman Sachs-types filling his cabinet. And they've been pursuing this line of attack for months not only after the elections (when the focus has shifted to his COI rather than his personality).


For example, their current headlines include:
IBM EMPLOYEES LAUNCH PETITION PROTESTING COOPERATION WITH DONALD TRUMP
Wells Fargo Is on a Losing Streak, But Still Has Some Trump Cards
IF YOU WANT TO SEE HOW DONALD TRUMP WILL DESTROY THE ENVIRONMENT, READ THIS LEGISLATIVE ROADMAP
Apple, Google and Others at Trump Tech Summit Have Stashed $560 Billion in Profits Overseas
If Donald Trump Is So Upset About Iraq WMD Lies, Why Would He Want to Hire John Bolton?
FACEBOOK FINALLY SAYS IT WILL NOT HELP BUILD MUSLIM REGISTRY
TRUMP’S PICK FOR INTERIOR SECRETARY WAS CAUGHT IN “PATTERN OF FRAUD” AT SEAL TEAM 6
Factory Near Carrier Sends Jobs to Mexico, But Trump Just Tweets

Just follow the work of Lee Fang, who drudged up tons of shit on all candidates.

Finally, I don't think people involved in the actual Clinton campaign are anything short of the ruthless standard required at the sharp end of political campaigning.

I'm thinking more about people in general. Like the guy who owns the footage we're discussing.
 
FFS. So depressing the way leaks that helped Trump's cause had absolutely no problem getting in the public domain yet stuff like this didn't. The whole wikileaks etc transparency thing didn't exactly level the playing field, did it?
I find the whole situation depressing. I'm disheartened nearly half of voters went his way and they've not really apologized for voting for someone with his traits. They've just stated they are not racist/sexist/*ist themselves. That's all well and good but they have voted this piece of $hit into the highest office basically telling kids that you can get away with this behavior and even excel. The GOP primaries were all fun and games but that is what failed us all. If the GOP voters really wanted an outsider, there should have been room for an outsider on that stage who didn't behave like Trump. Given that he's already backing down on nearly everything and they still cheer I'm not convinced they will turn on him anytime soon. They will have to be hit personally by his precedentsy.
 
Speaking of Gavin Newsom, his ex-wife is in the running to be Trump's spokesperson at the White House.

Hope she gets it over the likes of Katrina Pierson, Sean Spicer, or Laura Ingraham.

 
I'm thinking more about people in general. Like the guy who owns the footage we're discussing.


That's a very complex discussion, involving 60 million people on each side...

Certainly very capable and ruthless people were dead against Hillary. But even these "regular" people - they didn't release the Trump tapes because of respect for privacy but because of the potential legal backlash and because they thought he was toast.
 
The people with the tapes should have sent them to the Intercept or Wikileaks; I know Greenwald and others help whistleblowers learn how to cover their tracks online.
feck, send them to me I would of released the shit out of them.
 
Thought that was Alec Baldwin in the Drumpf pic for a sec.


"The Electoral College is there to stop more populous states with millions of voters like California elect a president", "The Electoral College just allowed tens of thousands of voters in three counties elect the president".
Greatest country in the world my arse. It would mean fecking nothing to scrap the electoral college tomorrow and even after the bullshit of this election a vast amount of voters will forget how the system functions by 2020.
I hope all those voters who stayed at home (48%) and those people who decided to stamp their foot and vote for trump show up in the midterms and enact real change in the system. I bet most don't even have a fecking clue.
We have to ask ourselves why red states have been doing so poorly over the last thirty years and why blue states have been somewhat successful. How do we relay this information to voters in these states in a way they can understand and accept.
This election I have heard about these poor Midwest people in dire straits with no jobs, bad health and high addiction rates. Have a look around, these problems exist in every state. Americans of all races have their issues but from my observations there is only one party that will work tirelessly to make those problems exponentially worse, yet they are continually voted in to office solely because there is an R next to their name on the ballot.
I was speaking to a friend of a friend in August and he just kept telling me we need a republican in charge, he could not tell me why, no matter how I pushed for an explanation even though I highlighted the difference between party policies, he just thought it was time for a republican yet went glass eyed when I mention the worst aspects of the Bush. Eight years ago may as well of been eight million years ago, it didn't exist in the eyes of some people. By the way this guy is self employed and more often then not is unemployed, he is on food stamps, his children go to public school, his mother and grandmother rely heavily on Medicare to stay alive and he lives within a mile of a fracking site. Will he regret his vote after a Trump presidency, very doubtful because it was Obama's fault who he believes is Muslim and is owned by George Soros.
 
Last edited:
"The Electoral College is there to stop more populous states with millions of voters like California elect a president", "The Electoral College just allowed tens of thousands of voters in three counties elect the president".
Greatest country in the world my arse. It would mean fecking nothing to scrap the electoral college tomorrow and even after the bullshit of this election a vast amount of voters will forget how the system functions by 2020.
I hope all those voters who stayed at home (48%) and those people who decided to stamp their foot and vote for trump show up in the midterms and enact real change in the system. I bet most don't even have a fecking clue.
We have to ask ourselves why red states have been doing so poorly over the last thirty years and why blue states have been somewhat successful. How do we relay this information to voters in these states in a way they can understand and accept.
This election I have heard about these poor Midwest people in dire straits with no jobs, bad health and high addiction rates. Have a look around, these problems exist in every state. Americans of all races have their issues but from my observations there is only one party that will work tirelessly to make those problems exponentially worse, yet they are continually voted in to office solely because there is an R next to their name on the ballot.
I was speaking to a friend of a friend in August and he just kept telling me we need a republican in charge, he could not tell me why, no matter how I pushed for an explanation even though I highlighted the difference between party policies, he just thought it was time for a republican yet went glass eyed when I mention the worst aspects of the Bush. Eight years ago may as well of been eight million years ago, it didn't exist in the eyes of some people.

The scrap the electoral college movement is also a bit disingenuous. Not only is it completely unrealistic given the hurdles required to undo a Constitutional amendment, it's also completely bogus given that it would help the Dems (ie. this entire narrative is one of self-interest not justice), and would only result in candidates campaigning in NYC, LA, CHI, PHI, ATL, PHO and forget about most states with lower populations.
 
The scrap the electoral college movement is also a bit disingenuous. Not only is it completely unrealistic given the hurdles required to undo a Constitutional amendment, it's also completely bogus given that it would help the Dems (ie. this entire narrative is one of self-interest not justice), and would only result in candidates campaigning in NYC, LA, CHI, PHI, ATL, PHO and forget about most states with lower populations.
How often do they campaign in Wyoming? North and South Dakota? Idaho? Hawaii? Nebraska? Mississippi? Delaware? etc.
 
How often do they campaign in Wyoming? North and South Dakota? Idaho? Hawaii? Nebraska? Mississippi? Delaware? etc.

Not often, but going from EC to PV would only double down on that sort of thing where people currently only campaign in about 20 states to where they would only campaign in the major population centers of about 8-10.
 
You'd have to actually compete for votes in all 50 states and DC. You couldn't just say "ah Wyoming is as red as they go and is only 3 EVs anyway, no point trying to get our voters out there". Ditto the other way round. Let's not pretend that the EC is a benevolent system designed to let the voices of small rural states be heard, it was designed so that slave states had a bigger say. It's a dumb 18th century system. At least promote the Compact so that you don't get ridiculous results as in November.
 
The scrap the electoral college movement is also a bit disingenuous. Not only is it completely unrealistic given the hurdles required to undo a Constitutional amendment, it's also completely bogus given that it would help the Dems (ie. this entire narrative is one of self-interest not justice), and would only result in candidates campaigning in NYC, LA, CHI, PHI, ATL, PHO and forget about most states with lower populations.

It's also not true at all the three counties elected Trump, he did not get 304 Electoral votes awarded to him by 3 counties, a look at where he built the 304 from shows that to be a lie.
 
The scrap the electoral college movement is also a bit disingenuous. Not only is it completely unrealistic given the hurdles required to undo a Constitutional amendment, it's also completely bogus given that it would help the Dems (ie. this entire narrative is one of self-interest not justice), and would only result in candidates campaigning in NYC, LA, CHI, PHI, ATL, PHO and forget about most states with lower populations.

It's a non-starter. A constitutional amendment must first win the support of two thirds of both Houses of Congress, then be approved by three quarters of the States. Smaller states would have to vote to reduce their own influence in the American constitutional system.

Democrats would have to stage a complete takeover of federal and state legislatures to carry such a reform. And if they achieved that, they'd have no reason to change the system.
 
It's also not true at all the three counties elected Trump, he did not get 304 Electoral votes awarded to him by 3 counties, a look at where he built the 304 from shows that to be a lie.
It's not a lie, it's just highlighting pivotal counties:

2. Just three counties – Macomb County, MI; York County, PA and Waukesha County, WI – elected Donald Trump. If those three counties had cast zero votes, Trump would have lost all three states and the election. By the same logic, just three counties re-elected President Obama in 2012: Miami-Dade County, FL; Cuyahoga County, OH and Philadelphia, PA.
 
You'd have to actually compete for votes in all 50 states and DC. You couldn't just say "ah Wyoming is as red as they go and is only 3 EVs anyway, no point trying to get our voters out there". Ditto the other way round. Let's not pretend that the EC is a benevolent system designed to let the voices of small rural states be heard, it was designed so that slave states had a bigger say. It's a dumb 18th century system. At least promote the Compact so that you don't get ridiculous results as in November.

But you had Hillary pretty much ignoring Red states for a large part of the process, paying only lip service to them until poll numbers showed they might be in play. You would not actually have to compete for votes in all 50 states, you would still have campaigns crunching the numbers and saying, well at best we can get 30% of the vote whether we go there or not, we are better off spending on our money in other states where we can generate more votes. Campaigns would simply target the states with the most voters who could be swung one direction or the other while pushing their get out the vote efforts in those states where they can get the most voters out there. The idea that under either system politicians will not do this sort of math is naïve.

Both systems promote ignoring certain segments of the population based solely on how they would affect the outcome and the results the campaign could get for their efforts in any given state/country/district.
 
It's not a lie, it's just highlighting pivotal counties:

2. Just three counties – Macomb County, MI; York County, PA and Waukesha County, WI – elected Donald Trump. If those three counties had cast zero votes, Trump would have lost all three states and the election. By the same logic, just three counties re-elected President Obama in 2012: Miami-Dade County, FL; Cuyahoga County, OH and Philadelphia, PA.

Really? You don't see the silliness of that argument? They may have been key battle grounds but to pretend they are the sole reason an election went a certain way by coming up with the "well if they did not vote (which is really saying if they did not exist at all?) is plain silly. What if all the States that Hillary won did not cast any votes? She would have zero electoral votes and Trump would have won 304 to nothing!!!!! Wow.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.