The Trump Presidency | Biden Inaugurated

Status
Not open for further replies.
I agree. I do wonder though, after reports of the meeting with the press not going well at all, if now they will start to stand up to the President elect and go hard after him? After all, what can he actually do to them for reporting the truth? Any sanctions he tries to impose on the press will only backfire on him later. It's a lose/lose and a war not even he can win, although his arrogance and recent surge of power may make him think he can and is untouchable, and that will be his downfall.

However, if say he is allowed to continue acting the way he does without repercussion of American law, then do you honestly think overseas corruption would be allowed to stand? At what point does that become a problem?

While we are on the subject of overseas corruption....

http://thehill.com/homenews/news/307143-argentine-leader-ivanka-joined-my-call-with-trump

This is taking the piss now. It really is. It's happening right in front of everyone's eyes and I can't see how it's being allowed to continue, why has nobody pulled him aside yet? Fecking bizarre.
Come on langster! he's just establishing business contacts for his daughter, it's a doh eat dog world out there and any parent would want to help their children just like the Trumpeter is. /S
 
So Trump basically playing the outsider card. Meaning he can do things differently.Which will play well with his base ,until they realise that nothing seems to be changing for them.
 
I'd say it goes beyond the Indian Pakistani conflict. Alot of Indian Muslims aren't particularly fond of Pakistan either

IMO most communal feelings in modern India can be traced back to the failed attempt in 1905 to partition Bengal; this led to the birth of the Muslim League (in the Viceroy's house) and in response the Hindu Mahasabha. It worked nicely to reduce the strength of the Congress, and le eventually to partition.

Of course there was tension before that but after 1905, and after the League split from Gandhi's Congress in the 20s, that's when you see it rise, and finally in WW2, when all Congress leaders were in jail, both the Hindu and Muslim extremists cooperated with the government and grew in popularity unchecked. Look at the change in the League numbers in the 1937 (106 seats) and 1945 legislative polls (425 seats).

For an idea of how marginal these views were (apart from in Bengal, where they got ~30% of seats):

The Sind Legislative Assembly had 60 members. Though 34 seats were reserved for Muslims, the Muslim League could secure none of them.[3]

The Congress won a clear majority in the United Provinces, with 133 seats,[5]while the Muslim League won only 27 out of the 64 seats reserved for Muslims.
...
And also:
After the election, Muhammad Ali Jinnah of the League offered to form coalitions with the Congress. The League insisted that the Congress should not nominate any Muslims to the ministries, as it (the League) claimed to be the exclusive representative of Indian Muslims. This was not acceptable to the Congress, and it declined the League's offer.

By 1945 the League had a majority in Bengal, Punjab, and Sindh (which became Pakistan) and decent numbers in Bihar and UP. NWFP (later part of Pakistan) though was majority Congress thanks to Maulana Azad.
 
Gangsters' paradise, isn't it?
 
So Trump basically playing the outsider card. Meaning he can do things differently.

Look at the Tweet I just posted and look at some of the replies. It will give you some insight in to how the morons think and basically excuse anything the President elect does/is doing, yet they continually jumped on Hillary for anything.

Nope, does not understand. But neither do his voters, so its all good.

Crooked Hillary

:lol: That's essentially what I just said in my reply to Drifter. Some of the replies are scary. They literally excuse him for being a businessman and are basically saying it's ok for him to be corrupt because that's his job, yet at the same time dismissing the argument of a blind trust and also saying that Bush and Obama aren't on his level. It's fecking unbelievable that truth, honesty and what is right is being completely ignored and twisted around. I understand politics has always been dirty and corrupt, and maybe it will take the big orange idiot to show everyone how corrupt because the only real difference is he is actually doing it right in front of everyone's eyes, rather than behind the scenes. Maybe in some strange ironic way he will be good because people will become so sick of him and everything that they will then demand honesty and transparency and vote in favour of politicians who actually want to make an honest change. That's the only solace I can find in this whole sorry mess at the moment.
 
Another good piece (shorter this time) from the New Yorker editor, on that Trump meeting with the news networks

 
I'm glad is shitting on the media - particularly the mainstream media. They let Trump getaway with murder and CNN hired Corey FFS

And because I'm never ever going to get over it

Votes are still being counted in Cali -

Popular vote
Hillary - 63,747,686
Trump - 62,020,213

Hillary with a 1.7mil vote lead :lol:
 
So Trump basically playing the outsider card. Meaning he can do things differently.Which will play well with his base ,until they realise that nothing seems to be changing for them.

Investors don't agree. They're abandoning bonds and piling into the stock market, meaning they're expecting an economic boom. The infrastructure projects should create lots of jobs. The problem, if it turns out to be a problem, will be debt.
 
I understand politics has always been dirty and corrupt, and maybe it will take the big orange idiot to show everyone how corrupt because the only real difference is he is actually doing it right in front of everyone's eyes, rather than behind the scenes

My sentiments exactly. I'm not disappointed with his victory at all, I actually see potential. A lot of people think the current structures need tearing down, a madman like Trump might prove the catalyst for that, intentionally or otherwise.
 
Investors don't agree. They're abandoning bonds and piling into the stock market, meaning they're expecting an economic boom. The infrastructure projects should create lots of jobs. The problem, if it turns out to be a problem, will be debt.

As an investor, I'm not buying that for a second. The stock market is also reacting to the prospect of lower income tax, which affects the profits and therefore value of companies immediately.
 
This has been a really fecked up crazy year so I am wondering, is there a chance, even a small chance that when the Electoral College meet in December a few dozen may change their vote to Hillary and pay the $1000 fine. Based on the frankly rediculous conflicts of interest, his softening of his campaign pledges, his cabinate and advisors being to extreme and his children and son in law sitting in with him without security clearance.
It's a very very long shot but will we see them finally put a nail in the coffin of this antiquated system. No matter what way you look at it one candidate when all votes are counted will have over two million more votes and still not win the election, how can this continue. I understand giving less populated states a voice but one party has no hope in hell in winning anything in ten or twelve states and gerrymandering has corrupted the electorate in a lot of purple states. But the election takes in the country as a whole and one man one vote seems a lot more above board then one state a few electoral votes. Every vote should count but the two million more people who voted for Hillary are discarded because they live in a more populous state.
The idea of the EC was to prevent people like Trump taking the top job, not handing it to him on the basis that 25% of the electorate voted for him.
Finally Jeff Sessions is a cnut and I hope the Dems in the senate crucify that motherfecker for the racist piece of dumbfeck shit he is, just had to get that out.
 
One slightly surprising thing I just noticed:

Obama votes in Florida in 2008: 4.3m; and 2012: 4.2m.
Clinton votes in Florida in 2016: 4.5m.
 
One slightly surprising thing I just noticed:

Obama votes in Florida in 2008: 4.3m; and 2012: 4.2m.
Clinton votes in Florida in 2016: 4.5m.

Which basically means FL really really loves Trump?
 
One slightly surprising thing I just noticed:

Obama votes in Florida in 2008: 4.3m; and 2012: 4.2m.
Clinton votes in Florida in 2016: 4.5m.

Latinos.

Problem is Drumpf brought out some registered inactive exurban voters and flip quite a bit of Obama's whites in those counties.
 
Whites love him.

He absolutely decimated her in Tampa area. The turnaround of that alone from Barry:Mitt margin was basically the winning margin.

When Amy Schumer was booed during her show in Tampa a week or so before the election, we should've known it was lost.
 
Cx4COzOWEAAbqcH.jpg:large


Hillary Clinton won < 400 counties nationwide, out of more than 3,000. Those HRC counties make up nearly *TWO-THIRDS* of the U.S. economy

So, Trump won in all the places where people want 'stuff' - where there are more 'takers' than 'givers'.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ost-of-the-american-economy-in-this-election/

For shame....FOR SHAME.
 
Cx4COzOWEAAbqcH.jpg:large




So, Trump won in all the places where people want 'stuff' - where there are more 'takers' than 'givers'.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ost-of-the-american-economy-in-this-election/

For shame....FOR SHAME.

And the bitter irony being that they elected the person least likely to actually help them or give them anything. Oh well, stupid is as stupid does.

OBSTRUCTION As the new President elect faces his own wall blocking him all the way.

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN13H111
 
It will serve them right when half their state is under water with his views on global warming. :mad:

I suppose it'll be the urban cities that go first, getting rid of more Dem supporters. Maybe the GOP are smarter than we realise...:lol:
 
Which basically means FL really really loves Trump?
Apparently so. Obama also beat 50% there twice with those numbers, whereas she got 47.8%. Big (10%+) increase in votes cast there and in Arizona, Texas and Nevada. And Oregon.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.