The Sunday Herald with Ronaldinho doing alot of talking about United...
- Thread starter Kevin
- Start date
Originally posted by VanNistlerater:
<strong>This is a decent debate and Weaste puts across a good argument, but, i believe Ronaldinho would benefit the team.</strong><hr></blockquote>
I'm fighting a losing battle, I'm all on my own.
I like him as a player, he's very talented, but I'm just trying to address some of the worries and other questions/issues involved in him signing for us.
If the Gaffer wants him, thats good enough for me(us). Agreed?
if we had a real link man then we would have been probably better than them. Personally i prefer RVN over Ronaldo
what the heck are you guys even arguing about?
No one questioned ronaldinhos ability.
No one questioned ronaldinhos ability.
Originally posted by ShAoLiN_ChRoNiC:
<strong>what the heck are you guys even arguing about?
No one questioned ronaldinhos ability.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Whether he is the best signing option for us, and if so, why, and then how we would use him and how often, and whether SAF can control him, and if not why not, and then would the whole thing be a distaster or not. That type of thing.
SAF did say he wants to strengthen United's defence. We have just been linked with Lucio. If we do get him, it would ruin the chance of Ronaldinho becoming the first Brazilian to play for United.
simple formula
Scholes is a better midfielder
Ronaldinho is a better link man
ending of story
Scholes is a better midfielder
Ronaldinho is a better link man
ending of story
so why are you comparing ruud + scholes to raul and ronnie?
its pretty clear if you ask me. behind an experienced defender, a goalkeeper and an alternative to Ruud (3 priorty positions IMO), he would probably be the priority.
i.e. an attacking player who gives the team another dimension, more options, backup and unpredictability. combined with pace, intelligence and raw skill.
never a bad thing if you ask me. he is definitely a player we could use for those reasons. its not even an argument if you ask me, we can use this kind of player.
and since we can use this kind of player, Ronaldinho suits better than most in the world right now.
its pretty clear if you ask me. behind an experienced defender, a goalkeeper and an alternative to Ruud (3 priorty positions IMO), he would probably be the priority.
i.e. an attacking player who gives the team another dimension, more options, backup and unpredictability. combined with pace, intelligence and raw skill.
never a bad thing if you ask me. he is definitely a player we could use for those reasons. its not even an argument if you ask me, we can use this kind of player.
and since we can use this kind of player, Ronaldinho suits better than most in the world right now.
i see where the problems are: who is better than who.
that is for the manager to decide, but a strong team should look to strengthen further.
the team lacks certain things i mentioned in my last post, Ronaldhinho can add some of those things. What more reason do you need? Its a squad game folks. different games require different players.
that is for the manager to decide, but a strong team should look to strengthen further.
the team lacks certain things i mentioned in my last post, Ronaldhinho can add some of those things. What more reason do you need? Its a squad game folks. different games require different players.
Weaste, SAF WANTS HIM. So that should be GOOD ENOUGH for you.
Our team lacks someone who can run at defences with the ball, deliver killing balls in tight spaces, create magic out of nothing.
Now there are only a handful of players who can do all this and you have to admit, it is something our team lacks i.e. a potential weakness.
Ronaldinho is one of the few players in the world right now who can do these things. coupled with him being young and versatile...he is practically ideal.
i am not looking at the first 11, i am looking at the squad and at the options at our disposal. who he replaces, where he pays etc is down to fergie. but he will fight for his place just like anyone else, he will play if he wins.
bottom line: he has something we could use therefore he could strengthen our squad. no argument.
Now there are only a handful of players who can do all this and you have to admit, it is something our team lacks i.e. a potential weakness.
Ronaldinho is one of the few players in the world right now who can do these things. coupled with him being young and versatile...he is practically ideal.
i am not looking at the first 11, i am looking at the squad and at the options at our disposal. who he replaces, where he pays etc is down to fergie. but he will fight for his place just like anyone else, he will play if he wins.
bottom line: he has something we could use therefore he could strengthen our squad. no argument.
To be honest, he might not even leave PSG! Their coach did say that he is going to everything he can to stop him from leaving.
in a way weaste i agree with you, everyone elses argument doesnt really add up. i think they are off track and getting it wrong.
i only agree with my argument in this thread. its quite obvious to me actually....are you just playing devils advocate?
i only agree with my argument in this thread. its quite obvious to me actually....are you just playing devils advocate?
Originally posted by vijay_vr:
<strong>
Read contents of 2nd and 3rd pages again..every possible explanation is given.</strong><hr></blockquote>
<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />
Only after I dragged them out of you.
And some of the reasons provide more questions than answers.