We'veGotDeleAlli
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2016
- Messages
- 1,009
- Supports
- Tottenham
Nice goal by Alli. Such a good finisher, one of his best attributes.
Always nice to score five, even in pre-season. Janssen and Alli are linking up well.
Agreed. Inter are a disgrace. Harrison getting in on the goal fest. One touch, one goal.Yeah, especially so close to the start and with quite a few first team players featuring for both sides. Best thing is getting some confidence back in Kane/Alli after their poor Euro's.
Inter Milan have been dreadful though, so I'm not looking too much in to this.
Any Spurs fans on here watching the Inter game? I don't usually pay much attention to pre-season, but since this one is so close to the start of the season, thought I'd give it a watch.
Not a penalty, but we should have had one when Kane was bundled over. Vorm should have saved the equaliser and Lamela's goal was just could be set for a brilliant season for him. He started to look like the player we paid 30m for last season, could this season be the one where he really hits his stride?
Yes, I reckon it very well could, which is why is tipped Lamela to the poster who was asking before about who to choose for his Fantasy team out of Lamela, Eriksen and Alli.
He combines so much: tenacious, combative and energetic + great footballing intelligence + a wand of a left foot, capable of both delicate touches and looping it in from long range.
Yes he's linked but I doubt there's any truth in it. According to reports he's got attitude issues. If that's the case he wouldn't last 5 minutes with Poch.Looks like the Boufal links are back up and running. I do hope for Spurs sake they get him. I think they will definitely need a few more additions.
Yes he's linked but I doubt there's any truth in it. According to reports he's got attitude issues. If that's the case he wouldn't last 5 minutes with Poch.
Mauricio Pochettino has that Spurs team playing with so much drive and ambition. I would not be surprised if he managed to get top four this season again even though competition will be much stronger.
Lamela performance today took me by surprise. I might have to replace Erikson in my team with him instead!
Will Lamela be a definite starter in the PL then?
From what I saw, he was not better than Dier, Kane, Ali, Dembele, Walker, Rose, Alderweild, Erikson or Lloris last season. He definitely had a much better season compared to the season before last, but he was not one of your better player for your team that season. Perhaps the weakest leaks out of your midfield and attack. However, that is not really a criticism because those other midfielders and forward played great that season. So being the weakest is not really such a bad thing.Not sure how Lamela's performance could have taken you by surprise as he was easily one of our best players last season - that said he does seem to be full of confidence now and that can only bode well for the future.
Opposing fans still don't seem to realize just how good Lamela actually is.Not sure how Lamela's performance could have taken you by surprise as he was easily one of our best players last season - that said he does seem to be full of confidence now and that can only bode well for the future.
Rather than poking at the wound of your insecurity, Spurs fans should embrace the reality of financial restriction. Your competitors are West Ham and Everton for the forseeable future.
Spurs have a first XI that is better than yours and probably at par with United.
Obviously agree that we didn't come close to winning it. Yet some will say we bottled the title. What we did bottle was second. Had no business finishing below Arsenal. I think our young squad, which lacked depth, ran out of steam at the end and we produced some shocking results. If we had a bit more in the tank this might not have happened and Spurs would have finished more than 4 points ahead of United, but, again, ifs and buts as you say.
But I think you also need to look at the performances... we generally played better stuff than just about every team bar Leicester over the course of the entire season. Again, depth and youth caught up with us and prevented the points tally from being higher but I think, from a match performance perspective, we're starting at a higher level to build on than say United or Chelsea...who put in some pretty shocking performances last season even in matches they didn't lose. Now that's not to say that the Mourinho and Conte systems won't come in and immediately transform the United and Chelsea performances, skyrocketing them past Spurs, but that's also not a guranteed thing. I mean, Mourinho was never supposed to fail as miserably as he ended up doing at Chelsea and LVG was supposed to be a major upgrade over Moyes.
Ultimately, you're right. The measure of a team is the points they finish with and that is how they are judged. But when evaluating a team heading into a new season I think it allows more room to also consider what lies underneath that points tally...the performances they put forth on the pitch. That's what gives me hope for Spurs heading into this season. After playing some really nice football last season our young players are a year older and more experienced, we've made some good signings to add depth in key areas, and Pochettino has had another year to work with the players and cement his philosophy. Lots of reasons to be excited heading into the season....tho I've always got my lilywhite-tinted specs on.
I think maybe this highlights the difference between a club like Liverpool and Spurs and why one so consistently finishes over the other. Pace and dribbling look nice, but only get you so far. This is an unforgiving game that only cares whether you've scored more than the opposition. Not whether you've dribbled past them, or beaten them to the by-line, when it's met with no end product the 3 points are given to the winners who put the ball in the net by any means possible - not the ones who looked the prettiest during the game. Although I will say we look darn good in this Pochettino era.LOL. Please like us, please respect us. Please think of us in the same way we do about ourselves.
The problem for Spurs is the opposite to the one they've had traditionally. They used to have one or two exceptional flair players and a soft, mushy underbelly that was routinely squashed by decent teams. Now they have a solid midfield and defence, are well coached and very hard working. But they are full of decent to good players, none of which are exceptional. They have no one of great pace, no one of great skill, no one who can beat three players. And they cannot afford to spend 50 -70 million on a player who might give them that necessary elevation. Neither, of course, are they a club with the pedigree to attract such a player.
Rather than poking at the wound of your insecurity, Spurs fans should embrace the reality of financial restriction. Your competitors are West Ham and Everton for the forseeable future.
LOL. Please like us, please respect us. Please think of us in the same way we do about ourselves.
The problem for Spurs is the opposite to the one they've had traditionally. They used to have one or two exceptional flair players and a soft, mushy underbelly that was routinely squashed by decent teams. Now they have a solid midfield and defence, are well coached and very hard working. But they are full of decent to good players, none of which are exceptional. They have no one of great pace, no one of great skill, no one who can beat three players. And they cannot afford to spend 50 -70 million on a player who might give them that necessary elevation. Neither, of course, are they a club with the pedigree to attract such a player.
Rather than poking at the wound of your insecurity, Spurs fans should embrace the reality of financial restriction. Your competitors are West Ham and Everton for the forseeable future.
Stoke and West Brom, lolAnd who are the competitors for Liverpool?
LOL. Please like us, please respect us. Please think of us in the same way we do about ourselves.
The problem for Spurs is the opposite to the one they've had traditionally. They used to have one or two exceptional flair players and a soft, mushy underbelly that was routinely squashed by decent teams. Now they have a solid midfield and defence, are well coached and very hard working. But they are full of decent to good players, none of which are exceptional. They have no one of great pace, no one of great skill, no one who can beat three players. And they cannot afford to spend 50 -70 million on a player who might give them that necessary elevation. Neither, of course, are they a club with the pedigree to attract such a player.
Rather than poking at the wound of your insecurity, Spurs fans should embrace the reality of financial restriction. Your competitors are West Ham and Everton for the forseeable future.
Maybe you're right. Perhaps none are exceptional on their own, but what they are is an exceptional team and that's all that matters.
... they are full of decent to good players, none of which are exceptional. ... they cannot afford to spend 50 -70 million on a player who might give them that necessary elevation. ...
I think obviously they are. There's a young golden boot winner who has had back to back 20+ goal seasons, a 19 year old with close to double digit goals and assists, one of, if not the best CBs in the league, etc. I was simply playing devil's advocate that even if they weren't we are still very good.Disagree entirely, we've got some very talented individuals who are fulfilling that potential because of Pocchetino's guidance. Just because we're organised doesn't mean we don't have some exceptionally gifted players.
... Spurs are a side of ordinary over achievers, a team that should finish sixth every year.
LOL. Please like us, please respect us. Please think of us in the same way we do about ourselves.
The problem for Spurs is the opposite to the one they've had traditionally. They used to have one or two exceptional flair players and a soft, mushy underbelly that was routinely squashed by decent teams. Now they have a solid midfield and defence, are well coached and very hard working. But they are full of decent to good players, none of which are exceptional. They have no one of great pace, no one of great skill, no one who can beat three players. And they cannot afford to spend 50 -70 million on a player who might give them that necessary elevation. Neither, of course, are they a club with the pedigree to attract such a player.
Rather than poking at the wound of your insecurity, Spurs fans should embrace the reality of financial restriction. Your competitors are West Ham and Everton for the forseeable future.