SwansonsTache
incontinent sexual deviant & German sausage lover
The trend that I identified a while back has continued to develop and extend further again this season.
You should just lay your trends and financial chickens to rest.
The trend that I identified a while back has continued to develop and extend further again this season.
You're right but I don't think he's talking about your ability to post shit there.The trend that I identified a while back has continued to develop and extend further again this season.
I see it as a massive compliment to our team that some people are downplaying our achievements this season - it shows that we are being held to the same standards as the likes of Chelsea, Utd, City, etc. and that's fantastic because it shows that we are becoming a team that is being seen by other fans as a team that should be disappointed not to win things. That is progression in my eyes.
I admire how your ability to throw a positive spin on shit posting.
You should just lay your trends and financial chickens to rest.
Come on, do you believe what you type?
Almost 62% in this forum thought Spurs won't get Top 4 (including me) this season. Apparently the new manager class was supposed to push Spurs outside top 4. Not only they retained Top 4, they are finishing second and the only team to even compete with Chelsea. Next season, they'll face other challenges like playing in Wembley and squad building, but how are we questioning the progress Spurs have made this season?
This line of logic is like Glaston randomly picking different years to create a trend. It's ridiculous. Spurs did well this season and have improved even though they haven't won it.
I expected you to win something this season given how well you performed last. Even just a domestic cup. I also expected you to get out of your CL group like Leicester. Perhaps that's why I'm critical but given the players you have I don't think I was expecting anything that wasn't achievable. Hence why I think it's a disappointing end to the season.
What shit posting?
Yeah I agree with that. If Wenger decides to stay next season and with Sanchez and/or Ozil leaving it's hard to see how Arsenal will finish above Spurs. They would need to have a really great transfer window and the recent signings of Xhaka, Mustafi, Perez etc suggests they wont. Wenger doesn't seem to be that great in the transfer market anymoreIn my view, we are currently in a better position than Arsenal and Liverpool to cement our self as a top side. On this point I do understand that opinions may differ, but the way I see it Liverpool got a good starting 11 offensively, but not much more and their wage structure limit them from adding to the squad depth as far as I understand. Arsenal's squad is decent, but aging and will probably lose their best player by far, on top of this their club structure is a mess with only Wenger doing things, and there are serious question marks over him atm.
Spurs have top class facilities, and soon the third biggest stadium in the country as well as a good young squad. The biggest question mark are wages, but after we move to the new stadium you'd imagine we'd be able to compete with Arsenal and Liverpool on that front (unless we have to limit this because of paying for it).
Never easy to predict the future, but I don't think we're going to inevitably falter down midtable where we 'belong' the way some have been claiming. Time will tell.
On the contrary, those who railed against what I said and stuck their heads in the sand should open their eyes a little. The notion of an "established top 4" consisting of the wealthiest clubs has long been collapsing, and has been further shredded this season.
Yeah, there is no denying that like I've stated in several posts here.
I am refering to those imaginary financial chickens you continuously claim will come home to roost for United. Compare the outlay for players like Sissoko\Pogba and Janssen\Mkhi with the annual turnover and you'll see what I mean. Your £30m is Uniteds £80+m.
Also see our wage to turnover ratio compared to some of the others in the league. If it wasn't for the money doped sugardaddy clubs with their amped up and rigged sponsor deals with their owners we'd be even better off.
Has it transpired into quality on the pitch though? Certainly not. But to claim we are some financial calamity is wishfull thinking.
That's not what I said.
Trying to convince everyone that its been a poor season for Spurs or that trophies is what matters for every club regardless of their past record etc. Hell, there was some guy who said 2nd place = 20th or something like that.
That's not what I said.
Ten years of chickensNot now, no. But me and you have had discussions before where you've claimed that United will be down some financial pit due to our scattergun transfer approach, wages and newly adopted galactico strategy.
"Sooner or later the chickens will come home to roost" as you've so beautifuly put it when discussing United's finances.
Reading our annual reports I can't see where that should come from though. United is probably the most financially healthy not sugardaddy infused club out there, with the possible exception of Bayern.
Good luck with your massive debt. How long will it be before it hits the 1 billion pound mark? These chickens will come to roost eventually and when they do the MUFC fire-sale will begin.
The premise is that your financial chickens are finally starting to come home to roost, which would hardly be surprising given the current financial climate, the stupendously large sums of money owed and the interest payments being sucked outwards.
If the premise is correct, then logic says (a) that you might not have large sums of cash to spend lots on signing new players for the forseeable future - not without first selling players to raise the cash at least; and (b) that some or all of the Ronaldo cash will disappear into debt servicing.
I'm disputing your crazy notion that money shouldn't matter to a club that's seeking to progress ...
And I'm saying that, regardless of how your debt arose, the debt "chickens" eventually come home to roost ... as many clubs have found to their cost.
Sure, Spurs could have found the money to commit 40+m on Fabiano (fee + wages on a 5 year contract), but then we'd not likely not have had the money to spend more sensibly later on ... except by borrowing it or selling off a key player. And then what would we do in January or next summer if a player like Suarez (for example), suddenly does becomes available?
No, it's not a yes: I've already said that if Spurs had £80m to spend I could think of dozens of better ways than spending it than spending it on Pogba.
Pogba would certainly be given every chance to stake his claim to a starting spot. However, you forget that Spurs midfield is better than United's. Your midfield need is greater than ours.
Sooner or later the financial chickens come home to roost. If you spend a vast sum of Pogba then down the line that money is not available for other players and/or wages.
Worried about it? As I've said, I really hope you do spend £100m on Pogba.
I've seen many posters on here talk about £100m as if it's nothing to United, when actually it's a very large chunk of your entire club income in the last published annual accounts ... and that's not counting the perhaps £50+m wages that could well be involved.
Yes, the payments would be spread out, but then so are all the future payments committed to from your vast spending since Fergie left. Cumulatively, these all add up ... and eventually the financial chickens come home to roost.
Very obviously, it's not a burden borne by income from single year ... it's just a waste of time to pretend I've said otherwise. But it is a stark illustration of the size of current and future spending commitments that United seem bent on taking on with Pogba. And it needs to be considered in aggregate with all the other current and future payments (fee instalments + wages) that United are already committed to.
So many United fans seem to think that your money is endless. But it won't be too long now before the chickens come home to roost.
I wonder how the Spurs players feel about their accomplishments, or lack theirof, this season, and I'm not referring to the PR stuff they blurt out to the media, I'm talking more on a personal level. Do you honestly believe they will be content with winning nothing yet again? I doubt their winning mentality if that be the case.
So cutting the lead from 13 down to 4 wasn't putting Chelsea under pressure? For a while now, every league game Spurs played was a must win to keep the title chase alive and they had been racking the wins up. The word "bottled" is used way too much here to the extent its lost its meaning.
Wait, you're making things up here to suit your arguement. No one has said that Spurs have had a poor season, on the contrary in fact, they have had a very good season, but will still end up with nothing to show for it just as they did the previous season. That's a fact.
There were great many people (Spurs fans included even if they won't admit it) who expected a trophy from Spurs this season, let alone a title push.
I wonder how the Spurs players feel about their accomplishments, or lack theirof, this season, and I'm not referring to the PR stuff they blurt out to the media, I'm talking more on a personal level. Do you honestly believe they will be content with winning nothing yet again? I doubt their winning mentality if that be the case.
Wait, you're making things up here to suit your arguement. No one has said that Spurs have had a poor season, on the contrary in fact, they have had a very good season, but will still end up with nothing to show for it just as they did the previous season. That's a fact.
There were great many people (Spurs fans included even if they won't admit it) who expected a trophy from Spurs this season, let alone a title push.
I wonder how the Spurs players feel about their accomplishments, or lack theirof, this season, and I'm not referring to the PR stuff they blurt out to the media, I'm talking more on a personal level. Do you honestly believe they will be content with winning nothing yet again? I doubt their winning mentality if that be the case.
Yes you cut the lead down, great but the actual moment, the one moment to truly pressurise them (1 point gap) you bottled.
They should be more worried about the financial worries of their players. If there was a identical company to the one you are currently working at with just as good or better future prospects down the road paying 3x what you are currently getting, would you consider changing jobs?
This romantic notion that somehow the players has bought into a "project" means feck all when you balance £100k/week against £250k/week, with equal or greater chance of trophies.
Trying to convince everyone that its been a poor season for Spurs or that trophies is what matters for every club regardless of their past record etc. Hell, there was some guy who said 2nd place = 20th or something like that.
The last couple of pages are full of Utd fans ramming "Its been a disappointing season", "how long will Spurs fan put up with this", "There's been no progress" etc etc down everyone's throats. Feel free to scroll and check.
Yeah, they havent won anything, so what? Is every club's season now judged only based on the trophies they have at the end of it? That's borderline stupid. Just see the poll results in this thread to get a broad picture of what people expected from Spurs this season. Will Spurs fans forever be happy with competing for titles even if they dont win? Hell no. Does that mean they're already dissatisfied or ready to brand this season a disappointment? Hell no again. They're at a high point as far as their club is concerned and they'd be happy with how they did last season and looking forward to next season hoping for progress and hoping their side develops further and starts winning things, even if it starts with a cup.
... Money talks at the end of the day.
Considering the money spent by United in the last 4 years - and the league positions it's given you - the "talk" sounds more like a strangled squeak.
Yes, the money spent on transfers by United will have a big impact on wether Spurs players get their heads turned by other offers.
Climb down off your romantic pedestal. Spurs is just a football club like anyone else and your players will sooner or later demand market price for their talent. Romance is long dead in football.
Perhaps you can keep a player out of loyalty and promise of trophies if you are Barcelona and the player is some homegrown prodigy, that isn't the case for you though.
Every season I get told the same thing: Spurs will be stripped of their best players and implode. Yet it never happens ... and won't happen this summer either.
There are some on here who seem to imagine that Spurs are some minnow club - helpless in a sea full of sharks. The reality is rather different.
Trophies, trophies, trophies.Considering the money spent by United in the last 4 years - and the league positions it's given you - the "talk" sounds more like a strangled squeak.
Every season I get told the same thing: Spurs will be stripped of their best players and implode. Yet it never happens ... and won't happen this summer either.
There are some on here who seem to imagine that Spurs are some minnow club - helpless in a sea full of sharks. The reality is rather different.
You make yourselves sound like a minow club though when the shoe fits.
When it doesn't you speak of yourselves as a big one.
Every season I get told the same thing on here: Spurs will be stripped of their best players and implode. Yet it never happens ... and won't happen this summer either.
Never say never, tis a cardinal sin.
What you seem to be forgetting Glaston is that the higher Spurs finish in the league, the more attention will be paid to the players who got them there. Alli, Kane, Dier, Rose, Walker etc are currently hot property. Real are rumoured to have taken an interest in Alli and Kane, along with the rest of the footballing world no doubt, Walker is on the outs with Poch, Rose has lost his thorns etc.
Trust me, this transfer window is huge for Spurs are their debateable ambitions.
Your strongest card is Levy, imagine what it would take to pry Alli and Kane off him.
But seriously though, put your Spurs coloured specs down for a moment and just rationalize the difference between £100k\week and £250-300k\week, with equal or greater chance of trophies.
Wouldn't you be tempted as a player?
It probably won't happen this summer. But sooner or later Alli, Kane and Eriksen will start to demand what their counterparts at United\Citeh\Chelsea are making.
Surprisingly Eriksen has stayed loyal for a while now, I don't think it'll be much longer though, footballers are human and if you can win somewhere else + add a good 30-40k to your wage you'd be an idiot not to take it, i'm sure even footballers see it that way too. You can only be loyal for so long before you want to actually win, if Spurs don't soon then they WILL lose their players, Modric and Bale didn't leave because Spurs were oh so mighty and successful, they left because Madrid gave them many things Spurs didn't, a wage increase and chances at titles, which has proven to be successful for both.Every season I get told the same thing: Spurs will be stripped of their best players and implode. Yet it never happens ... and won't happen this summer either.
There are some on here who seem to imagine that Spurs are some minnow club - helpless in a sea full of sharks. The reality is rather different.
Walker may be sold, but then we have Trippier to replace him (who is pretty good in his own right), and the fat cheque we'd get will come in handy for strengthening the squad in other areas.
I don't see any of our star players being sold this summer - not unless they really, really want to leave, are willing to go abroad and we get a mind-boggling sum for them.
And I'd think about whether I wanted to leave Pochettino and a squad with great team spirit, and not get to walk out in the new stadium wearing a Spurs shirt
I asked you to take of the Spurs specs, didn't I?
Do you think walking out with the United kit at Old Trafford or the Madrid kit at Santiago Bernabeu with an additional £150k\week in their pocket will be seen as a huge step down?
Your biggest card in this shuffle will be Levy who will demand something like £100m for both Alli and Spurs, and also be very weary of letting domestic teams buy them. But even then enough tapping up will make sure players like Alli and Eriksen with no historical ties to Spurs will down tools, Kane might be the exception.
Disappointing is what I've said and I've explained why.
Don't go accusing me of talking shit for expressing an opinion.
One of the cups maybe. They'd be disappointed to not have won one too. The league? Not at all. Most predicted they'd fall out of the top 4.I thought you were a Spurs fan, apologies.
No, not every club will be judged on their trophy count come the end of the season, but not every club in the league made significant strides like Spurs did last season did they? Spurs, based entirely on the exploits of the season prior, were expected to win something this time around. Burnely, West Ham and dare I say it Man United () not so much.
I think Jansen is shite (que him somehow scoring against us).I rate Uniteds signings last season, I think they are all good players, although the value for money argument can be questioned (although this is not an issue for you). This summer we didn't buy that well, although two of those players are very young and can come good or have resale value.
People said the exact same thing last Summer.But they performed well last season also, right up to a point of being genuine favourites for the title and we all know how that ended. This season they have performed well once again but, same as last season, will end up trophyless. In truth they were never really in the running for the title this season, Chelsea had it sewn up long ago. I do acknowledge the increase in points, goals scored etc but I just don't see that as a sure sign of significant progression. Not when you consider the likes of City, United and the champions elect Chelsea will no doubt spend heavily this summer, whereas Spurs will be unable to do so, at least not to the extent of the aforementioned.
How have Spurs not shown signs of progression?! Baffling...
The thing, though, is when a club with money actually gets it right they make it count as Chelsea have proven multiple times. Looking at United I think the only difference between us and Spurs is that the form of our supporting cast was dire at crucial moments in the season - get Martial and Mkhi playing well with the form that Ibra was in we could have achieved lots in the league.People said the exact same thing last Summer.
Money is far from a guarantee of success.
In fact it helps Spurs have a settled team for 3 years running now with a fantastic young manager. If the other clubs have money, they certainly don't have what Spurs have and I'd argue it's good a competitive advantage as money.