The Spurs thread | 2016-2017 season | Serious thread - wummers/derailers will be threadbanned

Will Spurs finish in top 4 in the upcoming season?

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
What is the difference between "now par" and "current par"? Are they one and the same thing? How does it work and apply in real life scenarios/situations? You seem to be the subject matter expert, so please explain it in detail with an example & educate others please.

I'm done with your tiresome obsession. I've given my view. You don't like it. I get it.

So carry on about "par" by all means, but I've said all that I intend to say on the subject.
 
So, on the basis of trends gathered in 2007-08, is it safe to say that Tottenham are going to win the Milk Cup every season? we can not call it "now par" but we can call it "new par", shall we?
His par concentrating on the now and how the squads are now shaped is strange given we're likely to have about 3 in our best 11 that were at the club three years ago.
 
Is their child actor midfielder Will Miller actually good?

He was cracking in Oliver Twist.

As a player, I don't know. He did OK in the two friendlies, but other Spurs fans may know a lot more about him than me.
 
I'm done with your tiresome obsession. I've given my view. You don't like it. I get it.
You can not accuse me of not liking something, when i am not even able to understand the nuts and bolts behind how your "now par" and "current par" works and applies in real life situations.

So carry on about "par" by all means, but I've said all that I intend to say on the subject.
You harp about your "pars and trend" about United and Spurs league positions in every other thread, but you are not ready to explain how it actually works. Please enlighten us posters so we can understand the concept. For us simpletons applying "pars and trends" the old fashioned way do not tally with your opinion.
 
Because they have a midfield even Paul Pogba would find tough to establish himself a starting spot into. They have a state-of-art academy and training facility & the best scouting network in the world. Their academy is supposedly loaded with and producing the top-class talent year after year. They will be one of the wealthiest club in the world when they build their stadium enhanced by the shopping complex, further boosted by the annual NFL game. They do not win any trophy & always finish behind behind arsenal but they have shrewdly assembled the best squad in the league, complimented by the best manager who has also never won anything meaningful.

Also, it's "now par" for them to finish above Manchester United in the league table every season.

There is loads to discuss and talk about this elite squad they have. Get on with the times.
I didn't think about it that way, I wish we had Eric Dier instead of getting Paul Pogba :( no but seriously this thread is literally just for Glaston to pretend Spurs' first team are really good and we should all be jealous, and then for everyone to get annoyed at him.
 
It means nothing, but they are having a shit pre-season. They have faced strong opponents though.
 
The conduct of some Man Utd fans in this thread has been awful.
 
I believe my post did say that. Your reading and comprehension skills are admirable.
Sounds like you're picking and choosing what to reply to. Worried you've been found out? Go back and reply to my initial comment. Can't handle the heat? I pity you Glaston :lol:
 
The conduct of some Man Utd fans in this thread has been awful.
Are you kidding? Why is it that man united fans on this forum are held to such high standards in regards to their posts, yet our rival fans are not? Just because they (I mostly refer to Glaston...) are in the minority, does that mean they should be allowed to spew utter bile just because they carry years of baggage against our club? If united fans say irrational things here, they get called out on it. This forum is praised for its levelheadedness and general 'sanity'. Yet again, I ask why Glaston is not held to the same standards we hold ourselves. He's a WUM of the highest order, plain and simple.
 
Are you kidding? Why is it that man united fans on this forum are held to such high standards in regards to their posts, yet our rival fans are not? Just because they (I mostly refer to Glaston...) are in the minority, does that mean they should be allowed to spew utter bile just because they carry years of baggage against our club? If united fans say irrational things here, they get called out on it. This forum is praised for its levelheadedness and general 'sanity'. Yet again, I ask why Glaston is not held to the same standards we hold ourselves. He's a WUM of the highest order, plain and simple.

He's not a WUM, he's just a bit mental.
 
Are you kidding? Why is it that man united fans on this forum are held to such high standards in regards to their posts, yet our rival fans are not? Just because they (I mostly refer to Glaston...) are in the minority, does that mean they should be allowed to spew utter bile just because they carry years of baggage against our club? If united fans say irrational things here, they get called out on it. This forum is praised for its levelheadedness and general 'sanity'. Yet again, I ask why Glaston is not held to the same standards we hold ourselves. He's a WUM of the highest order, plain and simple.
Glaston is legit mate. :lol:
 
It means nothing, but they are having a shit pre-season. They have faced strong opponents though.
Shit due to one goal losses to Juventus and Atletico or shit because you watched the matches and thought the performances were poor?
 
Shit because the performances were poor. The first two games they looked jet lagged, but against Atleti they were just poor.
I thought the game against Juventus was a poorer performance, especially the first half. But fair enough.

But outside of having a bunch of injuries or losing by 5 goal margins every time, how exactly does a team have a shit preseason? It's about gaining fitness and giving opportunities to fringe and academy players. Obviously you never want to lose, even in pre season, but it's not as if we're talking about 4 or 5 goal defeats here.
 
Pre season is all about fitness. I thought Spurs played well in the first half especially early on. Atletico also did well considering they had just arrived the previous day after a 28 hour journey their players looked very tired and nowhere near their best but did enough to win.
 
Not wise in a thread where people have already been warned for baiting.



Tom Carroll - 1193mins
Ryan Mason - 1311mins
Danny Rose - 2659mins
Kyle Walker - 3123mins
Harry Kane - 4027mins

Not too bad tbh. Expect to see Edwards added to that list next year and possibly Harrison.
I doubt Harrison will, I don't think he's ready yet but don't be surprised if you see Winks and Kyle Walker-Peters given time. Both are highly rated by Poch and Winks in particular stood out with his recent performances against Juventus and Atletico.
 
Should be in all competitions, 1000mins is plenty of game time, that's over 11 games.

If you're saying Walker/Rose aren't academy players then the same has to apply to every other club. In that scenario we would have 2 players (lingard/rashford), so Tottenham would still be higher than us. Arsenal would have 1 (Iwobi). etc etc.

Fact is that Spurs brings through a number of young players which they develop from ages 17+, if that means buying players in to fill gaps so be it but they still train and evolve at that age. Frankly its a system that works for them so I wouldn't begrudge it at all. It's a canny move on their part and its something we should be doing more of.

Also I disagree with your point about scattergun transfers. They clearly set out last summer with the objective of improving their defense and midfield. They did that. This season they've continued to look at improving the midfield and attackers. They've finally landed what I think is one of the best Managers in the league and he's swiftly rebuilt the squad with the emphasis on youth and got them heading the right direction (finally).

What I do believe is that Spurs have picked bad managers for as long as I can remember. @GlastonSpur do you know when Levy was appointed Director? I did a quick google and couldn't find anything concrete, it mentioned he was responsible for George Graham which was back in 1998. I'm looking through the names and none really jump out as being a genuine success apart from possibly Redknapp. I was surprised at how high Villa-Boas' points per game was!
Ah right. Think I was aware of that but it slipped my mind.

So Kane's the only true academy player they've brought through who's risen to any degree of prominence. Mason too if we're being kind I guess.

Fair to say that's all Spurs have brought through in last 10 years or so? No one memorable sticks out from their previous teams as a standout youth product.

Makes you wonder what the hell Glaston et al are on about. Far from having a brilliant academy it seems it's produced one top class player and one decent squad option.
Ledley King. The spurs academy only really started to become a serious venture 10 years ago. You cannot expect to produce reams of first team talent in less than that time frame. It is now beginning to bear more fruit, there are several in the academy knocking on the door and I expect some of them to get playing time this season, Edwards, Winks, Kyle Walker-Peters, then there is Onomah who has already had some first team time. Harrison is also a possible in the next year or two but not this season I don't think.
 
Essentially you are spot on with the probable Pogba's market value of 60m. He's not worth more than that probably. He's not the best midfielder in the world either, but given those who are better than him are not available we're after our best option on the market.

A player at the right age that would improve us immensely. It's a non brainer. With the amount of money coming in we can afford to spend 200m per season on transfers easily. Essentially you have to spend to get back on top. If you are already there like Barca and Bayern you can spend a summer without major incoming players, but we are still quite off quality wise. It's nice to see United having the desire to get back to its rightful place.
You mean that divine right you have to win everything every season? Gotcha.
 
Why can't you just talk about Spurs? This is the Spurs thread after all. Given how shite Utd have been why do you take such pride in being better than them twice in three awful years? Why can't you just answer a simple question, if Spurs recruitment has been so good why have 15 of the 19 players you signed in the last three years been incapable of breaking into your first team? Why has £140m of the £200m spent been on players not good enough?

And Spurs have had better managers than Utd for the most part. That's been the big difference rather than the players. Which is why when we had a better manager Spurs finished below us continually.
Because prior to Poch arriving Levy would buy players that represented "value" rather than what the team actually required. I think for the first time in Levy's chairmanship, he has got a manager he trusts to buy the players Poch wants and recommends. Levy's attitude/mentality has changed dramatically, Poch has the final say on all in-comings and outgoings, no previous manager has had that. The present and future (while Poch stays) will not be the same as the past.
 
Is this the 'redcafe vs Glaston' thread? Or is this meant to be a thread for debate about Spurs? Hard to decide which it is right now. Various points I have made in this thread have been dismissed outright because 'no because Glaston said something else and I'm gonna argue more with him' rather than give other Spurs fans views a listen. It's a very frustrating thread this. Stop the obsession with Glaston please, he is just one dude.
 
I agree. Spurs finishing above United is now more of a par expectation and not a great surprise.

I disagree with that tbh, finishing above Utd is still a good achievement for Spurs. How many times have we managed it in past 20 years?
 
Is this the 'redcafe vs Glaston' thread? Or is this meant to be a thread for debate about Spurs? Hard to decide which it is right now. Various points I have made in this thread have been dismissed outright because 'no because Glaston said something else and I'm gonna argue more with him' rather than give other Spurs fans views a listen. It's a very frustrating thread this. Stop the obsession with Glaston please, he is just one dude.
Yeah nothing has changed since I posted this:

Stop trying to bait Glaston/other Spurs fans. This should be for serious discussion. Final warning. Any more will see threadbans enforced.

If anything it has gotten worse. Just let me know the worst posters for the baiting and I'll ban them from this thread.
 
Is this the 'redcafe vs Glaston' thread? Or is this meant to be a thread for debate about Spurs? Hard to decide which it is right now. Various points I have made in this thread have been dismissed outright because 'no because Glaston said something else and I'm gonna argue more with him' rather than give other Spurs fans views a listen. It's a very frustrating thread this. Stop the obsession with Glaston please, he is just one dude.
Glaston actually talks a lot of sense much of the time. He gets "ganged-up" on and I suspect that gets under his skin a bit and makes him rant sometimes. However, I also suspect part of the reason he gets "ganged-up" on is that deep down many Man Utd fans recognise that spurs are slowly improving and starting to become a genuine threat to the "Sky four", which isn't a comfortable feeling. As @Speak posted earlier, they see Leicester as "cute", but watch the feelings towards Leicester change if they "intrude" into the top 4 a couple more seasons.
 
Glaston actually talks a lot of sense much of the time. He gets "ganged-up" on and I suspect that gets under his skin a bit and makes him rant sometimes. However, I also suspect part of the reason he gets "ganged-up" on is that deep down many Man Utd fans recognise that spurs are slowly improving and starting to become a genuine threat to the "Sky four", which isn't a comfortable feeling. As @Speak posted earlier, they see Leicester as "cute", but watch the feelings towards Leicester change if they "intrude" into the top 4 a couple more seasons.
That's not it at all to be honest. I'm not even trying to troll or be a dick when I say that I think Spurs will have a very tough job becoming a consistent top 4 club. No one denies that they are a good team, with a good manager, but the teams around them are improving majorly, making big signings, while also having much more money to work with. I have nothing at all against the club, I came to this thread because I enjoy debate. Most Spurs fans seem quite open to honest debate. It's just that irrational one bloke who deliberately provokes.
Is this the 'redcafe vs Glaston' thread? Or is this meant to be a thread for debate about Spurs? Hard to decide which it is right now. Various points I have made in this thread have been dismissed outright because 'no because Glaston said something else and I'm gonna argue more with him' rather than give other Spurs fans views a listen. It's a very frustrating thread this. Stop the obsession with Glaston please, he is just one dude.
Well said mate. Blame must go both ways, though. Of course people will respond to deliberately inflammatory comments. But I do agree, this thread should be about general Spurs discussion.
 
I disagree with that tbh, finishing above Utd is still a good achievement for Spurs. How many times have we managed it in past 20 years?

Each to their view, but I've been talking about the squads as they have been recently/are now, rather than going back as far as 20 years ago .... because I don't see that earlier eras have much relevance to today.
 
Each to their view, but I've been talking about the squads as they have been recently/are now, rather than going back as far as 20 years ago .... because I don't see that earlier eras have much relevance to today.
I agree with you but people don't get past "old habits" easily. It's like the number of people on here that always predict Liverpool to finish above spurs in the league, based upon "old times" and ignoring the fact that spurs have finished above Liverpool for 7 of the last 8 seasons. The "Suarez year" being the one exception.
 
.... the teams around them are improving majorly ... while also having much more money to work with. ...

Seeing as the season hasn't started, we don't yet know if all the teams around Spurs will improve majorly. The second part of your statement is certainly true, but it doesn't necessarily lead to major improvement.

Spurs vs the sugar-daddies and the cheque book managers ... I look forward to it.
 
Seeing as the season hasn't started, we don't yet know if all the teams around Spurs will improve majorly. The second part of your statement is certainly true, but it doesn't necessarily lead to major improvement.

Spurs vs the sugar-daddies and the cheque book managers ... I look forward to it.
Aye, nothing wrong with cheque book managers when they're (the club) spending what they've earnt through hard work and success, spanning decades.
 
Aye, nothing wrong with cheque book managers when they're (the club) spending what they've earnt through hard work and success, spanning decades.
I agree with you, and your implied dig at Man City and Chelsea :D
 
Seeing as the season hasn't started, we don't yet know if all the teams around Spurs will improve majorly. The second part of your statement is certainly true, but it doesn't necessarily lead to major improvement.

Spurs vs the sugar-daddies and the cheque book managers ... I look forward to it.
Do you criticise hardworking businessmen from your armchair, let's say Bill Gates, for spending their hard earned money on things they can afford? All I see from you is a bitter man criticising a successful club for spending it's legitimately earned money on improving itself.
 
Do you criticise hardworking businessmen from your armchair, let's say Bill Gates, for spending their hard earned money on things they can afford? All I see from you is a bitter man criticising a successful club for spending it's legitimately earned money on improving itself.

As I've already said, I haven't criticised United for spending money, I've criticised what the money has been spent on.

Moreover, attempting to buy success is obviously a legitimate strategy for clubs that can afford it and have earned their own money (I haven't said otherwise). It can be distinguished from, for example, youth development or coaching or reliance on a good scouting and transfer negotiation system.

When this approach is the dominant feature, then it can accurately be called cheque-book management. It's clearly been the most notable feature of United's approach since Fergie left - you only have to look at the net spend figure to see this - and looks set to continue, even accelerate, under Mourinho.

It's the same approach that's been taken by City for years now. The difference is that United have earned all of their money whilst City haven't.

Why do you object to calling it what it is?
 
@GlastonSpur

Do you expect us to get in the top 4 next season? I believe we'll have a very hard time of it, due to the increased strength of United, City and Chelsea. I actually feel our best chance of getting that fourth spot is to finish ahead of Arsenal. We were the better side than them last season, despite our collapse in the last few games. Arsenal also haven't strengthened much either, having only signed Xhaka. Yet to be seen if more signings are on the horizon.

Wanyama and Janssen are solid, if unspectacular signings. As mentioned previously, they provide depth in key areas, but I still feel we need another player going forward that provides something a little bit different. Perhaps that will be Nkoudou, but I have no expectations of immediate impact from him. We really lack a forward player with a bit of pace, N'jie could have been that missing link but due to his injury we may never know for sure.

I predict a slow start for us in the coming season, Dembele and Alli being out could be pivotal. Dembele in particular was a colossus for us last season, went very much under the radar due to all the Kante praise, despite putting in performances of a similar calibre. We will badly miss that energy and drive from midfield, as well as his ability to shield the ball under pressure and retain possession.

Personally, I think we'll finish 5th, which wouldn't be too disappointing at all. Finishing in the top 4 again would be fantastic and if we manage it we could really begin to establish ourselves as regulars in the Champions League, which would be incredible. What I'd really love though, is a cup. We've played some brilliant football of late and I'm delighted with the team, but what's the point of it all if we aren't picking up silverware? It's why I was furious at Pocchetino for throwing the Europa League tie against Dortmund, yes they were the superior side but we didn't even make a go of it. One of his few poor decisions, in my opinion. Had we beaten Dortmund we would have been favourites to win the entire tournament, of course we had a title race to consider but our next games were against Aston Villa and Bournemouth. It was definitely possible to play both.

Hopefully we can do ourselves justice in the Champions League, those nights with Bale tearing apart Maicon and Crouchy scoring late on to give us the win against A.C Milan were incredible for us. No expectations of course, other than 100% from the players.
 
@GlastonSpur

Do you expect us to get in the top 4 next season? I believe we'll have a very hard time of it, due to the increased strength of United, City and Chelsea. I actually feel our best chance of getting that fourth spot is to finish ahead of Arsenal. We were the better side than them last season, despite our collapse in the last few games. Arsenal also haven't strengthened much either, having only signed Xhaka. Yet to be seen if more signings are on the horizon.

Wanyama and Janssen are solid, if unspectacular signings. As mentioned previously, they provide depth in key areas, but I still feel we need another player going forward that provides something a little bit different. Perhaps that will be Nkoudou, but I have no expectations of immediate impact from him. We really lack a forward player with a bit of pace, N'jie could have been that missing link but due to his injury we may never know for sure.

I predict a slow start for us in the coming season, Dembele and Alli being out could be pivotal. Dembele in particular was a colossus for us last season, went very much under the radar due to all the Kante praise, despite putting in performances of a similar calibre. We will badly miss that energy and drive from midfield, as well as his ability to shield the ball under pressure and retain possession.

Personally, I think we'll finish 5th, which wouldn't be too disappointing at all. Finishing in the top 4 again would be fantastic and if we manage it we could really begin to establish ourselves as regulars in the Champions League, which would be incredible. What I'd really love though, is a cup. We've played some brilliant football of late and I'm delighted with the team, but what's the point of it all if we aren't picking up silverware? It's why I was furious at Pocchetino for throwing the Europa League tie against Dortmund, yes they were the superior side but we didn't even make a go of it. One of his few poor decisions, in my opinion. Had we beaten Dortmund we would have been favourites to win the entire tournament, of course we had a title race to consider but our next games were against Aston Villa and Bournemouth. It was definitely possible to play both.

Hopefully we can do ourselves justice in the Champions League, those nights with Bale tearing apart Maicon and Crouchy scoring late on to give us the win against A.C Milan were incredible for us. No expectations of course, other than 100% from the players.
Alli isn't out, he's done his 3 match ban. As for Dembele, yes we'll miss him but Wanyama will obviously step in and although he's basically a defensive midfielder there is no reason why Poch can't instruct either Wanyama or Dier to play Dembele's role and drive forward as best they can. I don't see it as a disaster. Why do you predict a slow start? We had a slow start last season due to players bedding in and a general gelling but gained a lot of momentum later, no real reason to start slow this time. As for top four, how do you know Man Utd, Man City and Chelsea will have "increased strength"? Spending a shed load of money doesn't guarantee increased strength, at least not immediately. I think it's more likely those teams will have slow starts than spurs. When Man City first got the oil money they spent an absolute shed load of money on World class players and were crap the whole of the first season and well into the second season before they started to click. van Gaal spent a shed load of money in his two year tenure, what did that achieve? There is no certainty whatsoever that the two Mancs and Chelsea will be stronger in the short term. Also two of those teams have managers with no PL experience, I think Guardiola in particular is in for a shock, having highly competitive teams coming at him all season. He's not used to that. I would like to see at least one player brought in that would improve the starting eleven, that also automatically strengthens the squad depth. There's still a month of transfer window left so until it's known who has done what I think it's impossible to guess who the top 4 will be.
 
I agree with you but people don't get past "old habits" easily. It's like the number of people on here that always predict Liverpool to finish above spurs in the league, based upon "old times" and ignoring the fact that spurs have finished above Liverpool for 7 of the last 8 seasons. The "Suarez year" being the one exception.

It must be a weird feeling to ever be looking up in the table at spuds.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.