I loved it , a million times better than 1 , 2 and 3 and 7.
For me only behind Empire and the first one.
I watched it again last night and I agree. If it wasn't reminiscent of previous films it would be the best.
I loved it , a million times better than 1 , 2 and 3 and 7.
For me only behind Empire and the first one.
For films that I know will be packed, I prefer going to the morning showing. The cinema is close to home so it's not too much of a bother, and it's usually more enjoyable. We can arrive a few minutes before the beginning, be sure to find seats and not be annoyed by crowds.Oh wait, here too actually, forgot they switched last night.
And I don't know why I teased you, I'm certain you'll have a better time than in afternoon or evening, without the god awful annoyance of mob of fanboys.
No, it really wasn't. Really contrived and full of annoying super coincidences. Space also feels extra small, and Ford and Fisher clearly phoned it in. I don't mind new people though, but McGregor, Neeson and even Jackson felt more natural in their roles. Yeah, lets forget Anakin for a bit.
And it really isn't much exciting. Both Menace and Clones had scenes that trump anything in this one, like Duel of the Fates, or McGregor taking on Fett Senior.
I hope it's just JJ Abrams that is the problem, I disliked Star Trek and detested the second part of that.
Agreed. Nothing really stands out for me after a few months from when I watched it.Not sure I would ever call it a slow burner, save for some Rey on nu-Tatooine scenes, it's actually moving at frantic pace. Some good looking scenes, it sure is pretty movie, but no great scene.
It felt a bit drawn out when she was learning the force tbf.Not sure I would ever call it a slow burner, save for some Rey on nu-Tatooine scenes, it's actually moving at frantic pace. Some good looking scenes, it sure is pretty movie, but no great scene.
She didn't learn the force. She just put some cheats and became from noob to pro instantly.It felt a bit drawn out when she was learning the force tbf.
What's that?Old Boy only works if you're willing to buy into the Scott Tenorman Must Die approach to revenge.fantasy. Otherwise the last quarter descends into farce. It's very well made though.
When did this happen?It felt a bit drawn out when she was learning the force tbf.
She didn't learn the force. She just put some cheats and became from noob to pro instantly.
When did this happen?
What's that?
Ah, South Park. Have watched the episode but didn't remember the title.The idea that a minor indiscretion deserves an irrationally disproportionate response. From the titular South Park ep where Cartman tricks a boy that made fun of him into eating his own parents...
I like Old Boy fwiw, and think it's a brilliantly made film, but the entire thing (specifically the "darkest" bits) rely on this Cartman-esque cartoon reasoning, which just never flew for me in a film that serious. Even Spike Lee's faithfully uninspired remake realised it needed some tweaking.
Bar the flying scene and the surfing scene, it was a ridiculously shit movie.Point Break (2015)
An unnecessary remake of the 1991 original. A huge screen advert of Jack Wolfskin clobber wearing mountain men covering every branch of extreme sport under the sun and the we're lead to believe they are experts at everything including the FBI agent Utah. A gang of not so childhood friends but global group of Robin hood adrenaline junkies with hilariously badly drawn shit tattoos chasing spiritual enlightenment because a Japanese eco-warrior says so. They choose to ' liberate money and the earths natural resources' before abandoning their ethos and turn into copkillers in some of the obvious robberies ever when they decide they need steal money for real in the end. Some familiar scenes but poorly done, lead actors didn't make the Bohdi & Utah bond as real as Swayze & Reeves did.
5/10
Ah, South Park. Have watched the episode but didn't remember the title.
Well, while Dae-So did a minor indiscretion, ultimately it resulted with a death, so not entirely something small.
The other two movies in the same 'trilogy' are different in that aspect. Especially 'Sympathy for Lady Vengeance'.
Cloverfield Lane. Would be 8/10, last act reduces it to a 5. feck you whoever forced them to do that ending.
I like the ending a lot... though granted, it would have been cooler if the film wasn't called Cloverfield Lane. (though I completely understand why it is... it's probably one of the main reasons this films made money)
But yeah, really enjoyed it... thought Goodman was excellent and the films twists and turns were very well handled I thought.
Really? I thought the ending brought the film down too, felt like they rushed it and probably had a ton of endings available and had no idea which to go with. I just had far more interest in watching the bunker situation play out. I think they could have explored a lot more with it though I appreciate we were lucky to get as much as we did considering the title.
Saw the trailer for High Rise before Batman vs. Superman yesterday, looked very interesting with a good cast. Good to read a first positive review of it!I loved it, thought the ending was a perfect fit to the film considering the world it's set in and everything building upto that point. It's a different tone from the preceding hour or so admittedly but it works when you consider that everything said and every item in shot is there for a reason. There's nothing in it that's not foreshadowed.
Watched High Rise earlier in the week, great adaptation of an excellent book. An absolutely bananas satire of consumption, society and class.
50 documentaries you need to see
Ten of the best nonfiction film-makers today choose their own favourites, from serial killer stories and studies in the horrors of war to meta pranks:
http://www.theguardian.com/film/201...es-alex-gibney-joshua-oppenheimer-james-marsh
Close Up, Abbas Kiarostami, 1990
A man pretends to be Mohsen Makhmalbaf, the director of Salaam Cinema. He insinuates himself into a family’s life out of loneliness, to make friends. At one point the family realise he’s not really the director and have him arrested. The film follows this man’s trial in an Iranian court, and then the real Mohsen Makhmalbaf meets the man and takes him to the family.
The impostor’s fragility ultimately embodies what it means to be poor and struggling in life, and through that you feel how sad it is that we live in a world where people are measured by wealth and power, and the cruelty that any human being could ever feel insignificant.
The idea that a minor indiscretion deserves an irrationally disproportionate response. From the titular South Park ep where Cartman tricks a boy that made fun of him into eating his own parents...(it's also where the "let me taste your tears" meme comes from)
I like Old Boy fwiw, and think it's a brilliantly made film, but the entire thing (specifically the "darkest" bits) rely on this Cartman-esque cartoon reasoning, which just never flew for me in a film that serious. Even Spike Lee's faithfully uninspired remake realised it needed some tweaking.
I've never thought of it a 'serious' film, in terms of the story at least. Of course it's serious film-making but the plot etc. is hardly realistic or supposed to be. I mean take the scene where he's fighting all those guys in the corridor for example, it's like something out of a videogame. If it wasn't so incredibly well made these kind of scenes would seem ridiculous but they just end up just adding to the unique style of the film. I like the over the top revenge story and feel it fits perfectly. It's all so operatic and I love it.
Close Up, Hoop Dreams, Night and Fog, Gimme Shelter, Man with a Movie Camera <350 documentaries you need to see
Ten of the best nonfiction film-makers today choose their own favourites, from serial killer stories and studies in the horrors of war to meta pranks:
http://www.theguardian.com/film/201...es-alex-gibney-joshua-oppenheimer-james-marsh
Old Boy only works if you're willing to buy into the Scott Tenorman Must Die approach to revenge fantasy. Otherwise the last quarter descends into farce. I actually felt the otherwise completely redundant sequel did a fairly good job of cleaning up the ending, even if it failed to match the original in any other aspect.
Is 10 Cloverfield a horror film? Or is it all about the monster again?
Is 10 Cloverfield a horror film? Or is it all about the monster again?
Agree with this, it was better than a lot of horror films I have watched.
The Abandoned
A woman takes work as part of a 2-person night security team in an abandoned hotel. She discovers a room that is not on the blueprints and a haunting begins from when she enters this room. Very low budget but it had great atmosphere. The scares though were at a minimum and I didn't really like the ending so much as I predicted it a mile off. There's still something to enjoy here 6.5/10
That's funny you should say that, I think the exact opposite. Except for a few of his best films, most of his stuff won't age that well and his legacy as a filmmaker won't be that impressive, imo. If anything, his stock is very high as it is.Tarantino is for me a great director of our times and will be appreciated more in the future than he is currently
I guess it's a preference thing.That's funny you should say that, I think the exact opposite. Except for a few of his best films, most of his stuff won't age that well and his legacy as a filmmaker won't be that impressive, imo. If anything, his stock is very high as it is.
Yeah but you said 'appreciated more in the future than he is currently'. He's a very well liked director I find, Hateful Eight got a bit of flak but not as much as it actually deserved I feel (I know you don't agree going by your review) as there's a lot of love for him, both from critics and viewers. A lot of the films you list are hugely appreciated, Pulp Fiction is a lot of people's favourite film. I don't see how he'll be 'more appreciated' in the future, that's all.I guess it's a preference thing.
I absolutely loved the shit out of Reservoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction (one of my all time favourite films), Inglorious Basterds, Kill Bill 1&2, Django Unchained and Hateful Eight.
I haven't seen Jackie Brown and thought Death Proof was garbage.
Oh I see your point. I think it's more from people I know personally who can't stand him as a person and therefore I think it clouds their judgement on him as a director. I also read many people bizarrely cheering for the fact that Hateful Eight got some bad press and the whole cinema/Disney/Star Wars fiasco. Just went through his films on Metacritic, and most of them seems to be in the 60-70 range... I think they should be higher.Yeah but you said 'appreciated more in the future than he is currently'. He's a very well liked director I find, Hateful Eight got a bit of flak but not as much as it actually deserved I feel (I know you don't agree going by your review) as there's a lot of love for him, both from critics and viewers. A lot of the films you list are hugely appreciated, Pulp Fiction is a lot of people's favourite film. I don't see how he'll be 'more appreciated' in the future, that's all.