- Joined
- Oct 22, 2010
- Messages
- 62,851
It probably could've used more slow motion though tbf.
I really was disappointed on it. Probably because expectation was very high. Also, I was very tempted to leave watching in the middle of the movie. I don't understand what was so good on it. Plot at best was average, the love story wasn't that strong either, and the final fight was disgraceful. Also, the music in final fight was pretty bad too.
On another note, why in old movies directors overrate that much technology. fecking hell, the movie was only in 2018.
About rating, to me 6 is ok and 7 is good. Blade Runner to me wasn't ok.
You're so on a WUM.
Ismail, Blade Runner is bound to look dated & a little poor (quality-wise). Pacing, though, is subjective - a 'slow burn' can sometimes be more satisfying than instant action.
Ismail, Blade Runner is bound to look dated & a little poor (quality-wise). Pacing, though, is subjective - a 'slow burn' can sometimes be more satisfying than instant action.
I'm not so sure, he really rates the matrix sequels, this makes me think he has odd taste!
G.I. Joe - The raise of cobra 6/10
Good special effects, good action, shit story and even worse acting.
Now I didn't want to comment yesterday on your very generous ratings above as I thought each to his own and all that, but considering your review below it looks like taking the piss to me now. Honest question, how old are you mate?In time 7/10
Concept was interesting, but the implementation of it was far from great.
Blade Runner 5/10
I'm probably going to be crucified for this, but it looked terrible to me and didn't live in it's hype. Shame cause I was expecting a really great movie.
And by the way, why old movies are so slow motion?
Now I didn't want to comment yesterday on your very generous ratings above as I thought each to his own and all that, but considering your review below it looks like taking the piss to me now. Honest question, how old are you mate?
21 mate. G.I.Joe and The Time were average movies (most movies I rate with 6-7). I really disliked Blade Runner like I explained above, for that it get from me a low rating.
I think Blade Runner still looks wonderful. I had my own complaints about it in terms of story, characters et al but I couldn't fault it in terms of aesthetics.
I too think Blade Runner's wonderful. But then, I think 2001's a work of art though plenty think it's dull as hell.
It probably could've used more slow motion though tbf.
The Dark Knight Rises
I avoided any kind of spoilers other than watching the trailers.........yeah I think I'm gonna start giving those a miss because really the impact some scenes might have had was lost because I already knew what was coming based on the trailers. Even so, not many faults and it will rightfully go down as one of the best trilogy's of all time....if not the best. I had a quick look around in the dedicated thread & usual sources, some of the complaints are ridiculously nitpicky.
9.5/10.
I like the Devil's Advocate. It's silly but fun. Everyone in it's acting in completely different films though. Theron seems to be doing a psychological horror interpretation of Stella DuBois, Reeves is acting in the same Bill & Ted movie he has been for 20 years, Pacino's in a cheesy 70s Hammer Horror flick and everyone else is somewhere between the remake of The Wicker Man and a Tim Burton movie.