Pics?
She's got the Scarlett Johansson kind of voice and charisma to her which doesn't make it worse.
Pics?
She's gorgeous, and you could get lost in those eyes...
Someone couldn't recognize John Malkovich? The guy oozes class ffs, have yet to see him do a poor role. Always a memorable, stand out character.
She's really nothing special, I saw a bird on a bike today who was at least 7 times as fit, though there was this weird effect when she put her head down on the handlebars going downhill, from the back you could only see her arse in lycra, it looked like a beachball with legs riding a bike.
Bit of an excursion there, bit certainly worth mentioning
Che, (part 1 & 2). 8/10
If you have a few hours time, it's worth it. Great acting by Benicio del Toro, and Demian Bichir (Fidel). All other supproting actors are superb as well. The first part follows Che until he reaches Havana and Batista is overthrown, the second part skips a few years and start immediately in Bolivia. This part is a bit depressing as you see the problems Che and his small group encounters, unable to convince the peasants to stand up and 'join the revolution'. It shows Che's delusion that what worked in Cuba must automatically work in Kongo and now in Bolivia. Soderberg's directing is good, especially as there is almost no shaking camera business which always gives me a headache.
She's adorable.
His voice makes me want to scratch my own face off with a guitar pick
I'm very, very tempted to buy this off Play at the minute - £18 for the pair though is a bit much at the minute.
I've heard a fair few people saying they got bored watching them, how would you respond to it being called boring?
I think if you're not bothered about Che and Latin American history in the 50's and 60's, you might be a bit bored, yes. I wasnt bored for one second watching the first part, maybe just a little bit in the second. Che part 1 is definitely not boring, there is a lot going on, change of pace, scenery, characters, jumping back and forth in time, it's a very dynamic movie although it has a lot of dialogue.
The mood of the second part is generally much darker, imo. Obviously so, it focuses on Che's small group in Bolivia and their failure to generate a real revolution. It shows Che's desperation and hopelessness very good. Also, I found both movies are far from glorifying Che. Im definitely gonna get both dvd's (maybe wait till the price drops down a bit) because I will definitely watch it again.
I don't really know a great deal about Che, but have always wanted to know the story behind it all. I figure the best way to get an idea would be to see it on screen. I think I will buy them, but wait a bit as you say until the price drops.
Cheers
The Motorcycle Diaries is excellent if you haven't seen it - I've not seen the Che movies so don't know if they cover some of the same ground. You should be able to get it cheap too but it will make you want to go travelling around South America, some stunning scenery.
A Perfect Getaway
This is easily for me the worst film i've watched all year, aboslute garbage - i've watched a lot of films this year but rarely wanted to leave during the film, this was as close as I got to doing that. I'll give it 1/10 and that's purely because some of the scenery was a bit nice!
no way, I was gonna watch that one! I saw the trailer and I thought it looks interesting (apart from those two pathetic wanna-be psycho laughing guys casted straight from a modelling agency) and that it doesnt give away too much, which is already a bonus since I hate knowing everything about the movie and loads of trailers show you the whole damn story.
Journey to the centre of the Earth. I didn't realize this was a kids film to be honest. I mean I'm a big fan of the book and although it's an illustrated adventure that reads quite easily, to my memory, it's full of satire and drama, science and geology. A lot of this was lost in the film as it was obviously solely targeted at a younger audience.
That said I enjoyed it, it was cheesy and a bit flowery, even for my tastes, but it was a good adventure with moments of humour and some cool fictitious CGI landscape. Plus it had a T-Rex. It was easy to watch with no depth or sub-plots really so I doubt many on here would like it. On the plus side- Anita Briem
Do all Icelandic women look like this?
Jim Carrey is great in every film, if you like what he does. Which i do & he essentially plays the same roles (outside of the odd serious ones he's done more recently). He divides alot of opinions.
Still waiting for Ace Ventura 3 (will they ever?). Then I saw they'd made a sequel with a kid. I was almost ill.
That was absolutely awful!
This might challenge High School Musical 3(whatever it is about) for most pathetic movie ever made.
If you were a raging bender, yeah
That was absolutely awful!
GI Joe. It's certainly action packed, I'll give it that. Pretty poor movie though.
a rape thing?
Genuine contribution to the thread
Transformers 2....
PIECE OF SHIT.
The Departed 6.5 / Infernal Affairs 9
OK, I'm gonna go on a rant here. I had an argument about this last night and saw IA mentioned in another thread so anyone who doesn't want to be spoiled stop reading
SPOILERS AHEAD
Right, I'm often accused by my mates of hating The Departed. This isn't true, I think it's a very good film, highly enjoyable and well acted. I can gladly sit through it 3 or 4 times. Problem is, everything good about it is ripped straight from Infernal Affairs and everything bad about it is added in. And the adds in make it far far worse than it's original counterpart. How Scorsese and WIllian Monahan in particular walked away with Oscars for this is something that annoys me greatly....It's not that it was bad, but that they managed to remake a film, with more money, great actors, a great director and all the freedom in the world, and they made it worse!!...How is that an achievement!
First off, Marky Mark. Now Mark is actually a good edition character wise. His character doesn't exist in the original and in terms of dialogue and on screen presence he's great. Problem is, his character is completely pointless and in 2 crucial instances, ruins the film for me. In The Departed when Martin Sheen's character is thrown from the roof (played out exactly as it did in IA) it's not the pivotal moment is should be because Marky Mark exists. In IA, he is the only person who knows the Di Caprio/Tony Leung Character is undercover so his death is a shocking and significant event. Thats it for Leo/Leung as far as we know. In TD, Marky Mark knows, so the whole importance is removed.
Then he comes into play again at the end by shooting the Matt Damon/Andy Lau character. There are several things here that annoy me. Firstly Damon is given no profound characterization in the film. He's the bad guy and we hate him. In IA, Lau is given a (forgive the word) journey in which he gradually comes to realize he's the bad guy and tries to atone for his ways. The shooting of his boss is the first step in this, not born out of self preservation as in The Departed, but down as much to guilt & atonement as it is to betrayal & saving his own skin.
Lau is actually the more interesting of the 2 in IA and crucially is the one who re-instates Di Caprio/Leung's status as a policeman after his death, even going so far as to bury him next to the captain. Something he does out of choice, not desperation.
The whole point of Infernal Affairs is the duality and jealously between the two. Both wished to have lived the other life. Di Caprio/Leung wanted the life of a respectable police man and Damon/Lau wanted the love and appreciation of The Gangster. In the end Lau is extremely jealous of Leung for doing the right thing. This is demonstrated beautifully in the last line of the film, one completely cut from The Departed.
At the begining, when both are in the Acadamy and Di Caprio/Leung is faux thrown out, they do it publically in IA, with the officer throwing him out telling the other cadets (including the Lau/Damon character) "Who wants to be like this man?" as a threat for those who don't take it seriously....At the funeral Lau thinks back to this incident and then says to himself - "I do". Brilliant!...Except in The Departed we end on Marky Mark shooting Damon/Lau because he's the bad guy, and then a rat scuttles past in some pathetic attempt at a visual metaphor that presumably seems cool to Monahan/Scorsese (yeah he's a rat, geddit? don't be a rat!!..feck yeah!!)
Then we have the stupid love triangle were Di Caprio (being the hero) sleeps with Damon's (being the villian) girl. In the end we find out Damon in impotent and shit in bed and the baby is probably Di Caprio's...What? Utter wanky bollocks....no such hokey macho one-up-manship hollywood tripe happens in Infernal Affairs and I'm glad it didn't...
Even the title is better!...Infernal Affiars (the original Hong Kong title referenced the lowest circle of Hell, so 'Infernal' play on 'Internal Affairs' is a brilliant bit of word play) Whereas 'The Departed is just some suedo intellectual guff Jack spouts about the dead.
In summary if you've seen The Departed, watch Infernal Affairs, If you've seen neither, watch Infernal Affairs FIRST!
Mega rant over..
Attack the Gas Station - again
Still a simple but truly astonishing comedy.
4/5
Visitor Q's a lot better.
Mockney:
The ending left it open for us to decide. It's entirely possible that oskar would essentially become the old man. Well that was the impression I got anyway.
And the crotch scene was in the book. Basically to show us that Eli wasn't a girl.