I’m just fecking with people at this point with Gosling and range, as well as the “greatest actor of his generation”. I’m a big fan and I think any fact based assessment of his career would indicate he’s got a lot of range as an actor, but people here don’t accept it. If one can watch Blue Valentine and then Lars and the Real Girl, and then Drive, let’s say, and not think that represents range, I don’t know what to say but it seems we are operating with different understandings of what it means to have range.
Clint Eastwood, as an example, is a movie star I adore, but who has zero range. He is simply not believable in any role that doesnt demand tough guy masculinity.
Brad Pitt, the face that launched a 1,000 ships, in my view also has zero range. Other than 12 Monkeys and Burn After Reading, he’s played a version of a handsome cool guy being super cool. I liked both of those rolls. I loved Pitt in a few things like Fight Club. But he has a very limited range, you simply wouldn’t believe him as a suburban dad, or an astronaut, or a doctor, or a lawyer, or a convict.
Colin Farrell also has been great in a few things, as I said, but he also has very limited range like both Eastwood and Pitt.
Oh well!