Snow
Somewhere down the lane, a licky boom boom down
Good going Stobs. Finally he gets picked.
Canizares was who I was going for, great keeper
Özil on the right is a common thing at Real. Not unusual at all. They have him or Callejon play there all the time. Madrid often doesn't play with a winger. Same with Barcal (I don't think you count Iniesta or Villa as wingers). Where does the width come from? A little thing called movement off the ball. You see, none of these players are rooted to their position. They don't hang there like Valencia (who doesn't know any better) but move around freely. Much like the current Chelsea side and many other teams as well.
Too many cooks to spoil the broth? Well shit. Someone ring Scolari, Tito or del Bosque and let them know.
I don't remember any of those managers shoehorning three advanced playmakers into the same side, so I think they already know. Also, Barcelona have Jordi Alba and Dani Alves rampaging forward to stretch the pitch and create space, you have William Gallas.
They didn't have three advanced playmakers (how Football manager of you to word it like that).
Don't know what you'll call Iniesta, Messi and Neymar with Fabregas and Xavi behind them. Name me a team that had that quality available to them and didn't decide to use it.
Need I remind you the team that won the Euros last time. No winger, 3 "advanced playmakers" and Arbeloa at right back.
I worded it like that because Kaka and Ozil are playmakers who operate in advanced positions, no need to be so condescending.
I'd call Messi and Neymar strikers or wingers, definitely not playmakers. Brazil in 2006 had that quality available to them and tried to use it, they failed miserably.
I'd argue David Silva is more capable of playing wide than Mesut Ozil. Also, Fabregas was effectively a striker and you only have two in central midfield, whereas Spain had three. Not to mention Arbeloa is a natural right-back, unlike Gallas. Looks like a very different system to me.
Messi and Neymar aren't playmakers? I didn't mean to sound condescending before but I certainly am not shying away from it now. Do you know what a playmaker is? Messi is one of the best playmakers in the world. Neymar is one of Brazils key playmakers and was the main playmaker at Santos. Of course they are playmakers. Their position is completely irrelevant. Messi is neither a striker or a winger. To categorize him as either is oversimplifying it.
True, Spain had three midfielders. That wasn't what was being argued and you haven't made a point as to why that matters. Also, why does it matters what you think is someone's natural position. What matters is that the player is better at it than someone else. Not that it's his best position. Gallas still was operating as a right back at his time at Chelsea when they were the best defensive team in the league.
Brazil beat Croatia, Australia, Japan and Ghana before being knocked out by the first decent team they faced. I'd call that failing miserably.Brazil didn't fail miserably. They won their group on 9 points. Comfortably went through the first knockout round and then lost out to France.
Surprised at how many lament Cañizares and not Toldo. Toldo is quite comfortably the best non-CL-tied keeper after Buffon.
Yeah he was the outstanding choice after Jake snapped up Buffon.Surprised at how many lament Cañizares and not Toldo. Toldo is quite comfortably the best non-CL-tied keeper after Buffon.
Sorry if it's been asked, but can non-participating members comment as to choices/ line-ups etc or do we have to wait unti the squads are chosen? Didn't understand what the OP meant at the last bit, didn't want to tred on anyone's toes..
Did someone actually pick Gabriel Heinze, or was that a joke? The guy was shit. Even when he won the player of the year at Man Utd, I still thought he was crap. Prone to errors and a bit of a thug as well. Absolute disaster of a pick, IMO.
Barthez isn't that bad of a pick, I don't know why people are going on about it, he was a quality keeper. I'd have him over Angelo Peruzzi.
Short memories, or never seen him in his prime, or just have a more romantic image of other keepers we've only seen a handful of times as they never played in the PL.
It's the Veron syndrome. I'm not going to think Veron is shit just because he flopped at Utd. When I see him I'll be thinking of one of the best midfielder's I've ever seen live (he played Wales once in Cardiff) and the player who was brilliant for Lazio. I know he was brilliant, so whatever happened at Utd doesn't change that.
All that is fine and I doubt anyone playing this draft or with enough knowledge on thier careers would judge them on their United form (specially in case of Veron), as far as I can see it is the pick that is being criticized, not the player. The pick is a gamble and I don't think you can argue against it.
You can, as long as you don't mention any unpicked names.
What if it's negative about a players choice? I didn't want to hamper his chances etc or is that the idea of it if your point is valid obviously
What if it's negative about a players choice? I didn't want to hamper his chances etc or is that the idea of it if your point is valid obviously
For me, Fernando Torres is a poor choice, people regard his time at Liverpool as a representation of his ability, I do not, I regard his time at Liverpool as very good form. His stats shows that before Liverpool, he didn't have a good conversion rate at all, and after Liverpool, his Chelsea days are now infamous for his poor finishing
As you can see below, his best season stats at Liverpool (the time he was apparently the best in his career), his best goals per minutes season was 95.2 minutes every goal, which is a brilliant tun in, but you can see quite clearly that of 3 good seasons, were clearly outside the norm for the way his career has been to date.
For me, Fernando Torres just isn't and wasn't ever that good, Spain is his only record that disagrees with me, and there are so many superstars there (not that it's easy for him), but he wasn't doing anything IMO that 10 other Spanish strikers at the same point could have done.
Year.............Club.........Minutes...Apps..Goals...Mins p/g
2010/2011 Liverpool 1895 23 9 210.5
2009/2010 Liverpool 1713 22 18 95.2
2008/2009 Liverpool 1734 24 14 123.86
2007/2008 Liverpool 2541 33 24 105.88
You know that this draft is based on the players at their peak and not over their whole career don't you?
I do now, and would have amended my first comment if I had known, but this doesn't make Torres a bad pick, it's just my opinion.
Torres is a very good pick at this stage. Heinze on the other hand
The "at their peak" part needs to be made very clear to voters though.
Very true, I do forget I suppose as it was a few years ago, and on form, no doubt he was unstoppable. I too, share a lot of memories worrying whenever he got near Vidic, but that was more to do with his pace than his ability to get past a man. The one thing he was very good at during his very good stage was finishing IMO, he was lethal and IMO on a similar to RVP now, but even RVP now has more about him as he doesn't rely on solely on pace.
Confidence in relative to form from any striker IMO, more so than any other position on the pitch, so I can't discount that, but when you lose confidence; you would be expected to try and regain this. My problem stems from his mentality more than anything else I suppose, someone who has been unable to regain confidence, yet being shown untold confidence by a club you have just moved to and have been playing quite badly for, this shows a weak mentality for me.
If you consider, as I am sure you do, confidence to be vital to a striker, it has to be an ability, or something that is able to be measured, if you pit this against other top players, for me he falls short.
(Also, FWIW, I am a stats enemy, I hate them, but they seem a very good way to get your point across over the internet, when I can't sit there and force people to watch historical youtube clips , my Mrs is sick of me )