Fury you mean ?
Yeah.
Fury you mean ?
I haven't watch for years until tonight, why do people dislike Fury?
He doesn't need to be. Thats why he has a trainer. He can lose plenty of pounds without much worry.What by a few pounds? He isn't going to cut muscle and come in significantly lighter, he isn't that clever.
Steve Cunningham managed to, and it's certainly not the first time he has been hurt in his career. The Wlad fight seems to have warped views on Fury. Joshua has too much speed and raw power for Tyson.
People here are seriously underestimating Fury. The lad schooled Klitchko in middle of Germany, he made Klitchko who's famous for his movement look like a bloob, Klitchko barely landed a single blow on Fury.
Fury despite all of his antics and shenanigans possess a brilliant boxing brain, big frame, massive reach, incredibly awkward style and moves like a welterweight.
Well, I don't know why they hate to score rounds 10-10, but the thing is, if 4 rounds are even, then it is incredibly unfair to score all four of them for the same boxer.Thing is I guess, given judges seemed weirdly reticent to score rounds 10-10, even if there's nothing between them, if you have a few rounds like that, you can easily feel your guy is four rounds down on where they should be i guess.
Neither can I, I honestly didn't think he was 41, how does a 41 year old do that....
Think Wlad did enough to not lose the round. Scored it 9-9Wlad gets two points for his knockdown, but not AJ?
A quick google search will answer that. He has offended swathes of society with his, er, 'out there' views on certain issues.I haven't watch for years until tonight, why do people dislike Fury?
The love-in? Virtually every post in the past 5 pages has been filled with buzzword condemning.1.) That doesn't change that Fury is a scumbag of a man, and 2.) I can't agree. The love in for that man on this forum is bizzare.
acheivement*Indeed, but still the lineal champ. It seems as though his achievements have been forgotten with the AJ hype.
You're picking one fight out of his entire career and disregarding everything else. It's like watching Heskey do step overs and saying he schooled the football world. Being great once doesn't nullify everything else you ever did.
I'm 45 and my cardio fell off a cliff about a decade ago. For someone like Wlad to go deep into a HW title fight is incredible.
nah AJ won it by one in the power punches I think? He should get +1 for the knockout. To me Joshua was better from rounds 1-5, then it was Wlad from 6-10 where AJ managed to hang in the match and then Wlad was really spent in round 11.Think Wlad won that round. Scored it 9-9
Joshua is very fast and has twice the power. He wont be able to run away from Joshua forever, and as soon as Joshua gets in close Tysons lack of chin will be his downfall.Fury is a much faster boxer then Joshua and Klitschko for that matter. If Fury is motivated and wants it, he'll have watched Joshua tonight and he would have seen a man who's showed lots of weaknesses.
And he's head movement is so poor, I thought it would have learned from after what White did to him but once again he left himself open
I really don't get why they virtually never score rounds a draw either. I get that they like to see aggression, but if neither fighter lands a meaningful punch, surely it's much of a muchness? Get what you mean about if you have several of those rounds- you'd think they'd try and even it up.Well, I don't know why they hate to score rounds 10-10, but the thing is, if 4 rounds are even, then it is incredibly unfair to score all four of them for the same boxer.
Also, in the first two rounds (especially the second), Wlad had the initiative. They were barely hitting each other, but Wlad was attacking most of the time. How does Joshua gets both of them?
The other possibility is of course if they scored the fifth round 10-8 for Joshua. Joshua knocked down Wlad, but Wlad came strong in the second part of the round and almost knocked down Joshua. That round should have been 10-9 for Joshua IMO.
I had the same score as the third ref. The Sky - despite being English and biased toward AJ - had Klitschko leading by one point.
10-8 typically means dominating the round by a large margin. You can get a 10-8 even without knock downing the other boxer (Pacquiao had a 10-8 vs De La Hoya despite that he didn't knock down him). You can also get a 10-9 if you knock down someone, but he comes back strong.Wlad gets two points for his knockdown, but not AJ?
9-9 is not even a score! One has to have 10!Think Wlad did enough to not lose the round. Scored it 9-9
One performance against a longtime raining world champion in multiple sanctioning bodies.
A fight where his opponent was displacement and demotivated. I fancied Klitschko for the rematch with Fury.You're picking one fight out of his entire career and disregarding everything else. It's like watching Heskey do step overs and saying he schooled the football world. Being great once doesn't nullify everything else you ever did.
Yet he's still beaten Vlad after what should be considered a terrible fight on his part. He came in far too heavy and went for it far too early tonight, that won't happen again.
41 isn't that crazy old in boxing, especially the heavyweight division as the fights are slower paced than the smaller weight divisions. George Foreman famously won a world title at 45 against 26 year old Michael Moorer. More recently Bernard Hopkins won a world title at light heavyweight aged 48.
Joshua beats a 41 year old man at Wembley with Eddie Hearn setting it all up, and lets be honest we all thought, during the fight, that Wlad was on with a chance of winning it. Fury and possibly even Alabama WBC boy or even Haye if he can ever stop being Darren Anderon or Owen Hargreaves, will own him. Can't wait.
Tonight I was jumping up and down when Wlad put him down on his arse in London. These Gary Cornish, Martins, Brazileessesssess just didn't measure up to the hype. A 35 year old Wlad or any year old Vitali puts AJ away. Tyson Fury owns them all.
Fury is a much faster boxer then Joshua and Klitschko for that matter. If Fury is motivated and wants it, he'll have watched Joshua tonight and he would have seen a man who's showed lots of weaknesses.
And he's head movement is so poor, I thought it would have learned from after what White did to him but once again he left himself open
Every dog has his day. You've got to be fair and consistent, and not just ignore everything else he's ever done just because he did one thing once.
10-10 then9-9 is not even a score! One has to have 10!
Have you seen the improvement, though? The glaring weakness of being as stiff as a board was as prevalent in this fight as all of his previous.AJ will only get better, he lacked a bit experience tonight and it was understandable. It will be interesting if he plays Povetkin or another more technical boxer, although he will have him on distance. IMO AJ will beat Fury, has too much power and the latter won't survive that long as Wlad tonight.
Foreman was a massive one off though. The body just loses its ability of explosive cardio once you get into your 30s, much less late 30s, much less early 40s. For Klitschko to even compete at this age is incredible. For him to knock AJ down and take the fight that deep is even more impressive.
Agree for a bunch of rounds, but not the knockdown round.10-10 then
10-8 typically means dominating the round by a large margin. You can get a 10-8 even without knock downing the other boxer (Pacquiao had a 10-8 vs De La Hoya despite that he didn't knock down him). You can also get a 10-9 if you knock down someone, but he comes back strong.
Wlad almost knocked down Joshua on the same round. On the last 2 minutes, it was all about Wlad. I think that it should have been 10-9 for Joshua, heck someone might even say 10-10, but no way it was 10-8.
Sixth round was easily 10-8. Joshua went down and barely survived the round.
I haven't watched boxing in about 5 years and even then I was just watching big fights, even I hate fury, god he's annoying.I haven't watch for years until tonight, why do people dislike Fury?