Moby
Dick
Never wanted a defender in this round tbh.
Never wanted a defender in this round tbh.
I do agree with others though that if you have Matthäus and Falcao already in that midfield they'd do that and Redondo would take a more defensive/stabilising role. You risk having a bunch of headless chicken running around otherwise.
I'd go with a back 4 if I was you, as much as I think Zibi can do a fine job as a wingback I'd rather have him in the final third in a free role, as you usually put it creating chaos, than have him constantly looking over his shoulder.Pretty obvious I won't get the RB I want. Back four out of the window then?
Indeed.Losing Rio was a hard blow for you, Aldo, now that I think of it. 'Cause he did sport a beard. A stupid one, granted - but hair is hair, as they say.
Yes. But everything good in this world depends on NOT having headless chickens feck it up for ya. I'd put it like this: The 3 X B2B idea is steeped in the tradition of total football. The three MUST know when to push forward and when to hold - and they can't all do their own thing in isolation - the latter would be, let's say, the Stevie G school of box-to-boxing. They must be disciplined and they must have brains for football, that goes without saying.
Anto.. make your pick, this wait is killing me haha.
Part and parcel of Redondo's game was his forays into the opposition half. He sat deep, ventured forward, fell back again, hit it long, hit it short, carried the ball into opposition territory - the works. He may have functioned as what people call a pivot today at times, but he certainly wasn't limited to that.
The tendency towards specialization in football has made his type all too rare. Like Matthäus or Falcao, he was a complete midfielder.
I'd go with a back 4 if I was you, as much as I think Zibi can do a fine job as a wingback I'd rather have him in the final third in a free role, as you usually put it creating chaos, than have him constantly looking over his shoulder.
Obviously, Redondo wasn't limited to that as he had great close control which helped him to get out of tight spaces. But his best was when he sat in front of the defence and orchestrated the play. He made some attacking runs here and there but those were mostly one-touch build ups plays to create an opening for the attack. Box-Box midfielders are players like Matthaus or Robson or Vieira. Players who do plenty of off the ball running in attack. Redondo on the other hand likes to have the ball mostly.
Obviously, Redondo wasn't limited to that as he had great close control which helped him to get out of tight spaces. But his best was when he sat in front of the defence and orchestrated the play. He made some attacking runs here and there but those were mostly one-touch build ups plays to create an opening for the attack. Box-Box midfielders are players like Matthaus or Robson or Vieira. Players who do plenty of off the ball running in attack. Redondo on the other hand likes to have the ball mostly.
Well, that's pretty close to being purely nominal to me. If you think he was at his best orchestrating I wouldn't disagree vehemently with that. By "box-to-box" I personally understand a midfielder who is involved in the play from box to box, as opposed to either a holding midfielder, a so-called deep lying playmaker, a sheer destroyer or a purely attacking midfielder. Redondo was none of the above.
As I said above, it doesn't matter what name we give them - if you want to reserve the "box-to-box" label for something else, that's fine by me. It's being used in different ways as it is. To some a "box-to-box" midfielder has to get into the box (Robbo), to others he needs to cover the area between the boxes as part of his natural game (Redondo).
I prefer the term "allrounder" - and what I want are three such allrounders (midfielders who are proficient both defensively and offensively) in a 4-3-3, as opposed to three specialists (to put it in extreme terms).
Well, that's pretty close to being purely nominal to me. If you think he was at his best orchestrating I wouldn't disagree vehemently with that. By "box-to-box" I personally understand a midfielder who is involved in the play from box to box, as opposed to either a holding midfielder, a so-called deep lying playmaker, a sheer destroyer or a purely attacking midfielder. Redondo was none of the above.
As I said above, it doesn't matter what name we give them - if you want to reserve the "box-to-box" label for something else, that's fine by me. It's being used in different ways as it is. To some a "box-to-box" midfielder has to get into the box (Robbo), to others he needs to cover the area between the boxes as part of his natural game (Redondo).
I prefer the term "allrounder" - and what I want are three such allrounders (midfielders who are proficient both defensively and offensively) in a 4-3-3, as opposed to three specialists (to put it in extreme terms).
I'm glad Anto took Gotze off my hands, I really don't like him much but felt I'd have to pick him over XXXXXXXX purely because he is more proven and likely to pick up more votes off his world cup goal.
It was only a matter of time until he got picked.
Can't wait for games to turn into ogba threads and "SAFs biggest mistake", etc. The kid is really good but his head isn't right, discarded him quickly on the basis of mentality even if the furious muppet voting he would get was enticing.
Can't quite figure out Joga's team. He needs a LB at any rate.
Cafu - Koeman - Keown - LB?
Or is he gunning for a third CB? In theory he could use De Rossi back there for that - but it seems unlikely he would've actively drafted him for that purpose.
I assume you mean XXXXXXX? If so I passed on him because I have a few DM's in mind who are stronger and proven - just hope no one else picks them. I was looking at Koke and Pogba.. thankfully for the formation I have in mind, one of them was still available.
I assume you mean Jennifer Lawrence? If so I passed on him because I have a few DM's in mind who are stronger and proven - just hope no one else picks them. I was looking at Koke and Pogba.. thankfully for the formation I have in mind, one of them was still available.
He's blatantly leaving a space open for XXXXXXXX.
I'm glad Anto took Gotze off my hands, I really don't like him much but felt I'd have to pick him over XXXXXXXXXXX purely because he is more proven and likely to pick up more votes off his world cup goal.
Can't wait for games to turn into ogba threads and "SAFs biggest mistake", etc. The kid is really good but his head isn't right, discarded him quickly on the basis of mentality even if the furious muppet voting he would get was enticing.
Tevezbola and the youth round has definitely evened up the teams a bit I reckon. Good draft so far
I was actually speaking about Goetze haha. I think he's easily the best pick in this category. Proven more so than others in his age group (bar a select few). With most of these picks you can always argue and see the talent, but with Goetze, you have a player which his performances thus far already back up the hypothesis.
He's blatantly leaving a space open for Phil Collins.