Grylte
"nothing wrong with some friendly incest, bro"
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2014
- Messages
- 15,187
I kinda agree but to be honest you can also make the case that there were no other real contenders. Stipe in my opinion deserved a rematch but I UFC will always look for the bigger pay day and from DC's position, why not take the easier and more lucrative fight? Instead of taking a fight where he decisively won.It's crazy how DC has gotten away with this with little criticism from fans. He held a whole division up for ages for a Brock pay day and whilst people said it was a stupid fight the common response was it was good DC was getting a pay day (as of he's skint or something)
Hope Stipe KOs him personally
I kinda agree but to be honest you can also make the case that there were no other real contenders. Stipe in my opinion deserved a rematch but I UFC will always look for the bigger pay day and from DC's position, why not take the easier and more lucrative fight? Instead of taking a fight where he decisively won.
Completely agree with your first point. Brock has no business even stepping in the cage let alone fighting for the belt. But unfortunately, money talks.Yeah maybe so but I'd argue literally every other heavyweight is more deserving.
For all the criticism Bisping got with GSP, McGregor fighting whoever he wants etc this is just as bad and no one has really said anything
Completely agree with your first point. Brock has no business even stepping in the cage let alone fighting for the belt. But unfortunately, money talks.
As for your second point, I think people give DC leeway. McGregor and Bisping are polarizing characters, easy to hate. DC is generally an upstanding guy that has only two defeats, to an absolute drug cheating cnut. But he HAS held up the division and it's getting on my nerves.
Good point. feck DC. Cry baby wimpYou're right about Jones but DC was only too keen to fight another in Brock.
Completely agree with your first point. Brock has no business even stepping in the cage let alone fighting for the belt. But unfortunately, money talks.
As for your second point, I think people give DC leeway. McGregor and Bisping are polarizing characters, easy to hate. DC is generally an upstanding guy that has only two defeats, to an absolute drug cheating cnut. But he HAS held up the division and it's getting on my nerves.
Completely gone off him. Whine, whine, Jones this, Jones that, whine whine.
You forgot "Cain Velasquez is the best fighter ever"
This I dont mind. As long as he's with a calmer head beside him. Cruz is the best though.Yeah, par for the course i suppose. Don't mind gym loyalty, but still a tad annoying.
He's as much a dick as many others in many ways but i do respect him as a fighter though. He's a phenomenal competitor, the fat bastard.
Don't particularly like his colour commentary - too excitable for me. Cruz wins hands down in that role.
SHANE BURGOS (30-27, 29-28) DEF CUB SWANSON (30-27) BY SPLIT DECISION
Looks weird. How can one judge have it 30-27 and another one 27-30?
Cowboy is a legend, always entertaining!
It's brilliant. I sometimes post there as random football players.As listeners to the CME podcast would tell you. It's AYFKM!!!!
Gorgeous KO, but not as good as Yair Rodriguez's upward elbow vs Korean Zombie in the last second of their epic encounter.
Almost as good as this:Just watching Swanson vs Burgos and someone in the corner not sure for whom all he keeps shouting is “be athletic” what the hell is that supposed to mean great cornering.