Listened to the first half, will listen to the rest later; from the bit I've seen so far I kinda get where they're coming from in terms of it being a pulsing from previous dosage but there also seems to be a huge amount of assumptions and good will being shown towards Jones on their part instead of suspicion.
He talks about the picogram results having a +/- variability of upto 40 or something but then seems to err on the side of that meaning Jones true value could have been lower than he got accused of when it could just have easily been higher. There also seems to be very little real understanding of how oral turinabol really metabolises itself because he was talking about the short, medium and long term metabolites that appear in the body after ingestion but was unable to give time frames for when the long term metabolites showed up and was citing a study for a different (but similar) drug that showed this "pulsing" effect where one test could show negative and then a week or two later show a ~200 picogram result, but that experiment was only 260 ish days and Jones case is verging on 18 months, and perhaps longer considering it was these long term metabolites that showed up originally so one must assume the oral turinabol was taken at least a month or two before that.
It just came across as a bit desperate and far too partisan towards Jones even if some of the reasoning was sound, like I said I'll listen to rest later but with the lack of testing done with oral turinabol (it's illegal everywhere so no clinical trials are possible and there's only one study that's been done by the Russian guy from the Icarus film which was done on himself) it seems like there's a lot of grey area for people to work with if they want to use it and then claim ignorance later on.