Dirty Schwein
Has a 'Best of Britney Spears' album
I'm nothttp://espn.go.com/mma/story/_/id/1...pion-jon-jones-enters-drug-treatment-facility
Holy shit!!!!
Jones tested positive for cocaine! I'm in shock!
I'm nothttp://espn.go.com/mma/story/_/id/1...pion-jon-jones-enters-drug-treatment-facility
Holy shit!!!!
Jones tested positive for cocaine! I'm in shock!
Quite disappointed tbh. Is he going to get a ban and what happens to his belt??
Nope, he's not going to get a ban and he'll keep his belt.
As a pretty casual viewer I didn't realise the sport was riddled in drugs. Is this the case @sun_tzu ? I remember Nick Diaz getting banned for weed so what's different in this situation?
If you get caught with coke/weed in your system "outside of competition" (ie a month before a fight, like Jones) then the UFC say there's no problem. Diaz actually fought with an illegal substance in his system. That's the difference.
Yep been seeing this over reddit too, they were suggesting it was from cycling off PEDs I think.There's quite a bit of speculation about other abnormalities in Jones' tests:
http://www.bloodyelbow.com/2015/1/7...petition-drug-tests-all-show-abnormal-hormone
Vitcor Conte and others have said that the T/E ratio suggests the use of masking agents.
I can't believe your figures there. 185lbs is just over 13 stone. I've known several amateur rugby players six foot or less who reached that weight with very little body fat and definitely didn't use PEDs (other than creatinine). At least one of them would have managed that while still in school. And that's without any of the highly specialised diet and training that MMA guys use.
I'm nit-picking though. Wouldn't be surprised at all if most of them are juicing and I know next to nothing about body-building. I'm sure @Zarlak will have an opinion though.
I can't believe your figures there. 185lbs is just over 13 stone. I've known several amateur rugby players six foot or less who reached that weight with very little body fat and definitely didn't use PEDs (other than creatinine). At least one of them would have managed that while still in school. And that's without any of the highly specialised diet and training that MMA guys use.
I'm nit-picking though. Wouldn't be surprised at all if most of them are juicing and I know next to nothing about body-building. I'm sure @Zarlak will have an opinion though.
Trust me, before I got into bodybuilding, I would have been of the same opinion as you. But what people deem as low body fat is usually around 14%. Also below 6ft every inch of height usually means about 5 lbs potential lean mass and above 6ft is goes to abut 6 lbs per inch. All that means is that a guy of 6 ft 2" should be able to have about 27 lbs of lean body mass, than a guy of 5ft 9". So these little things make a big difference. I seriously doubt the rugby players you know are below 5ft 9" and 8% body fat, whilst weighing over 185 lbs. At the end of the day the UK's most well known "natural" body builder is 5ft 10" and 5% body fat on stage and he weighs 175 lbs. His name is Rob Riches and he got busted for steroids!
But we shouldn't be comparing them with body builders anyway. Bodybuilders get everything right in terms of diet and training for building muscle. Michael Bisping has said a couple time that it just makes no sense to him how all his opponents are so muscular. These guys go hard for 5 rounds, so you don't really want that much muscle and your training should relate to that. This is why EPO is such a popular steroid. Lots of muscle means more oxygen is required and EPO allows red blood cells to carry more oxygen.
Also if you aren't in to bodybuilding etc you probably wont know about pro hormones etc. So many people take them and still count themselves as natural, because they come in pill form and can be bought legally on the high street. So when rugby players and so on claim they aren't on anything other than creatine, I wouldn't be so sure. I used to thin if you can buy it off the shelves in the UK, then it's a safe and legal supplement.
I think that's the difference between the weight of (most) MMA fighters and body-builders. I'd imagine you can still have visible abs and good muscle definition with body fat even higher than 14%. Which is probably where most MMA fighters come in. Jon Bon Jones has never looked particularly ripped anyway. I'm sure if he got his body fat down to single digits he'd be quite a bit lighter.
Look at the examples of Cro Cop and Shogun. Their UFC records are rubbish compared to when they were fighting in a non tested organisation. Yet their fans claim Shoguns knees are the problem and Cro Cop lost motivation, rather than that in the UFC you have to cycle off much earlier, whilst in Pride you can take Tren (which turns you into an animal) right up to the fight.
Id like to see them move the weigh ins to the morning/ early afternoon of the fight - you would see a lot less weight cutting and in my opinion much fresher fighters rather that as we see far to often fighters who cut so much water they went straight onto IV bags after the weigh in and they gas out in the 3rd round@redmeister don't forget that they are totally dehydrated during the weigh in, you can temporarily lose 5 to 12% of your body mass, by combining sauna, jogging and eating almost nothing.
Id like to see them move the weigh ins to the morning/ early afternoon of the fight - you would see a lot less weight cutting and in my opinion much fresher fighters rather that as we see far to often fighters who cut so much water they went straight onto IV bags after the weigh in and they gas out in the 3rd round
Id like to see them move the weigh ins to the morning/ early afternoon of the fight - you would see a lot less weight cutting and in my opinion much fresher fighters rather that as we see far to often fighters who cut so much water they went straight onto IV bags after the weigh in and they gas out in the 3rd round
I cant recall them changing a fighter due to a weigh in before - typically if they miss weight they forfit a % (is it 25% or 50%) of their prize money to their opponent - that mechanic could remain unchangedIt's complicated for the announcers and the UFC, if the a fighter doesn't make weight, you have not enough time to replace him.
It's complicated for the announcers and the UFC, if the a fighter doesn't make weight, you have not enough time to replace him.
@redmeister don't forget that they are totally dehydrated during the weigh in, you can temporarily lose 5 to 12% of your body mass, by combining sauna, jogging and eating almost nothing.
But so are body builders. When we see these 205 lb guys in the octagon, they are closer to 220 lbs. So they don't look so ripped. But at the weigh in we get to compare them with on stage body builders. Obviously they don't have the same proportions or natural insertions, so they don't look as good, but we can see who their lean body mass compares.
I dont think the weigh in time factor has anything to do with the UFC anyways.they could easily have a couple of fighters as back up ready just in case (in case the other fighter refuses to fight a over weight opponent). I think they don't want to change it for other reasons...
But so are body builders. When we see these 205 lb guys in the octagon, they are closer to 220 lbs. So they don't look so ripped. But at the weigh in we get to compare them with on stage body builders. Obviously they don't have the same proportions or natural insertions, so they don't look as good, but we can see who their lean body mass compares.
http://www.subjectmma.com/explained-jon-jones-drug-test-scandal/
Good article here that summarises the whole thing pretty well. It really seems like Jones was on something more than cocaine, based on everything I've been reading. The coke is a tiny story, a distraction, compared to that.
Sorry i don't understand, what is your problem, their real weight, the doping or both ?
I dont think the weigh in time factor has anything to do with the UFC anyways.
Its just the rules in combat sports in general. Weigh ins are 24 hours prior.
I doubt UFC would have any interest in paying fighters to be on standby just in case either.
Yea I get that, and like Randall I don't want to believe it, but it really seems suspicious indeed.Someone posted a similar article earlier on in the thread. Piss tests are a terrible way to determine serum concentrations of anything. Especially in athletes, whose hydration status will be all over the place over the course of an average day training, so the concentration of anything dissolved in the piss will go up and down like a yo yo. Useful for tracing presence or absence of something (drug screens) but crap for anything more complex than that.
Interesting point about the blood sample being taken but never disclosed. The plot thickens...
But the logistics of it do seem pretty hard to have fighters on stand by ready to jump in. Say you have on average around 10 fighters on the card, you then need 10 fighters to do a training camp, pay their own costs, pay for flights, hotels etc and most of them might not even get to fight. Then you have fighters who like to prepare by creating strategies geared around those they are fighting, do you make them create two plans for two different fighters and so on? Seems too complicated to implement.For sure, its just a thought. It just would be so much better that way. Weight cut is a dangerous activity that can potentially kill you, so i don't know why there's room for that. Anyways, i dont mind if we keep going as it is.
ps. doubt UFC would have to pay much to keep a couple of extra fighters... how many fit ready to go pro fighters would be more than ready to step in for a chance to be part in a ufc event?
a fight camp is a long (and expensive business - for example 12 weeks living away paying for you accomodation, your trainers (probably at least a couple of guys) plus paying for gym time, sparing partners and wages on top of that trainers often take a % of any fight purse so they would probably want more money of you were on stand by and all that comes out of the fighters money (often up front)For sure, its just a thought. It just would be so much better that way. Weight cut is a dangerous activity that can potentially kill you, so i don't know why there's room for that. Anyways, i dont mind if we keep going as it is.
ps. doubt UFC would have to pay much to keep a couple of extra fighters... how many fit ready to go pro fighters would be more than ready to step in for a chance to be part in a ufc event?
I don't have a problem, as I don't mind them taking PED's. I got into MMA early so it would be absurd to start moaning about it when even the likes of Royce got busted. I loved Pride, so again it would be stupid. I was very entertained when the UFC brought in Brock and though he hasn't ever failed a test, I'm not blind! So I definitely don't have an issue with PED use as it's part of the sport and I enjoy the sport.
My point is to simply show that so many of the fighters have more lean body mass then they should naturally, yet we rarely see failed drug tests. Until recently there wasn't even random testing. Yet lots of MMA fans really see the fact fighters have not failed tests as proof they are clean, when often you just need to look at them to know they aren't.