gooDevil
Worst scout ever
That's the worst stoppage I've seen from Herb Dean. Shame.
Aldo vacates 145 title. Meets Pettis at 155, if he wins he obviously gets the lightweight title. If he lose, he's allowed to go back to 145 and fight for the featherweight title again. Win - win for Aldo, he look good for going up a weightclass to fight for a title. If he loses, he gets an immediate rematch to get his old title back.How would this happen? Would he go up a class? Or maybe a catch weight fight? Don't think I've ever seen one of those in the UFC.
So, this is actually going to happen then? I can't fecking wait!Aldo vacates 145 title. Meets Pettis at 155, if he wins he obviously gets the lightweight title. If he lose, he's allowed to go back to 145 and fight for the featherweight title again. Win - win for Aldo, he look good for going up a weightclass to fight for a title. If he loses, he gets an immediate rematch to get his old title back.
Aldo vacates 145 title. Meets Pettis at 155, if he wins he obviously gets the lightweight title. If he lose, he's allowed to go back to 145 and fight for the featherweight title again. Win - win for Aldo, he look good for going up a weightclass to fight for a title. If he loses, he gets an immediate rematch to get his old title back.
Not in the UFC, it's never been done.BJ Penn held two titles at once, I don't think Aldo would have to vacate his title. I suppose if he had no more intention to fight at 145 then he would probably do the honorable thing and vacate, but he wouldn't have to.
Not in the UFC, it's never been done.
He does have to vacate, according to Dana at the press conference! And nothing else makes sense anyway, Aldo gets injured quite a bit and hasn't fought in more than two fights a year since 2009. He'd hold up both divisions if he owned both belts.
Nah man, I mean you're correct in that Aldo could do it if he wanted, but Dana won't let him, or at least the UFC doesn't want it to play out like that! There are no official rules for this shit, it's just up to the UFC to decide how they want it all to play out.So, is that a hard and fast rule? I could swear I've heard talk of someone wanting to try to hold two belts at once.
You're right, I thought Penn had the lightweight belt when he beat Hughes. And I thought the commentators had said before that he'd held two belts at once, but obviously I'm wrong.
Absobloodyexactly.
Is it true that those athletes who abused steroids when younger will have even worse testosterone deficiency later in life?
The whole concept of testosterone deficiency is bizarre. Some people have more testosterone than others. It's a quirk of your genes. There's an Irish rugby player who recently tested positive for excessive testosterone and they did a whole raft of tests which proved that it was entirely endogenous. Conversely, you'll have dudes with a lot less testosterone to spare. Everybody produces less testosterone as they age. That's life. Absolutely crazy that a professional athlete is allowed to combat this natural decline by pumping himself full of exogenous testosterone, on the basis that he is "deficient". You're not deficient, you're old.
Someone's panicking...Absobloodyexactly.
Is it true that those athletes who abused steroids when younger will have even worse testosterone deficiency later in life?
Someone's panicking...
I'm fine with it. By the same rationale you could argue that if you blow your knee out, well tough titties, you can't get it repaired because it isn't natural.
Part of advancing medicine and quality of life for people is altering their natural hormone levels as well. If it allows athletes to extend their careers who is anyone to say it isn't OK.
Certainly if a pill came out that allowed an individual to maintain their mental acuity and vigor well beyond normal retirement ages people would take it, yet that is hardly natural. A brilliant doctor or scientist with another 20 years of top level brain power is fantastic. So why do we criticize athletes for doing exactly the same thing? The argument that it is about fair competition doesn't float either, because in any walk of life you are competing with other people.
Caffeine is a stimulant and it is not natural. How many people could function well without it? Let alone compete in terms of productivity head to head with someone who is using caffeine?
There is no real logical reason why we allow everything else under the sun, yet draw the line with hormones as they relate to athletic performance.
BJ Penn held two titles at once, I don't think Aldo would have to vacate his title. I suppose if he had no more intention to fight at 145 then he would probably do the honorable thing and vacate, but he wouldn't have to.
Take that rationale to it's logical conclusion and PEDs shouldn't be illegal at all. They're all just medical science finding a way to enhance natural processes after all. There's logic in that stance, at least. Not sure it's a popular one though.
Caffeine was once on the WADA list of banned substances, by the way. They were considering adding it back again as recently as 2010.
Caffeine still is I believe, at certain levels. Or at least it is banned by some organizations. I know Chael Sonnen gave an interview about caffeine being banned at a certain level.
I actually do believe that PED's should only be banned if they are deemed harmful and it can be proven. Otherwise I say deregulate it. You only penalize the people who won't cheat because enough people will that it will be an unfair playing field.
I see your point but it's a slippery slope IMO.
Malcolm Gladwell came up with the idea that PEDs are just a way of balancing out genetic advantages, paradoxically making sport fairer. Which is arguably exactly what TRT is doing.
I thought this article did a great job of debunking that theory.
https://www.nsfwcorp.com/dispatch/killing-point/
Disappointed in Overeem, didn't seem like he wanted to lose spectacularly at all tonight. Hopefully he'll try harder next time.
Silva should be able to take out Sato and get back on the winning track. Good bet to get a knockout.
Souza vs. Carmont looks like a great fight. Souza has knocked out Okami and choked out Lawler. Carmont is an beast, one of my favorite fighters to watch recently.
Hoping for another head-kick KO from Machida!
Carmont is one of your favourite fights to watch recently? Really?! Or maybe you mixed him up and meant to say Jacare? Carmont has been boring as feck recently!
Currently 12/1 to win via KO on betfair. Not a bad bet....
@Pat_Mustard
You like Mousasi, right? Nearly certain I've seen you talk about him before. What do make of this fight with Machida and him then?
Machida is in absolute incredible shape. I'd almost go as far as to say at this rate I can't see hardly anybody beating him in this division with Silva gone. Still think it's a matter of time before he's the champion.
Based on my predictions lately though expect Machida to get knocked out in the first few seconds and never win a fight again
Machida is in absolute incredible shape. I'd almost go as far as to say at this rate I can't see hardly anybody beating him in this division with Silva gone. Still think it's a matter of time before he's the champion.
Based on my predictions lately though expect Machida to get knocked out in the first few seconds and never win a fight again
I mean the whole fecking card, but yeah, that was terrible tooIt turned into an appalling fight alright. A shame, as the first round was quite decent.