- Joined
- Dec 17, 2013
- Messages
- 11,801
- Supports
- Brazil, Arsenal,LA Aztecs
I fully support the selection of the Bamboozle Card. They made the right choice
I fully support the selection of the Bamboozle Card. They made the right choice
Except when he's up against your team, then he's not QF worthy.I agree, Varela belongs with someone who knows he is a final-worthy DM in any draft.
Sweet!!!!!!You can have the used Bamboozle card
I fully support the selection of the Bamboozle Card. They made the right choice
What's life without a little fun?Yes, it does strike me as more of a “watch the world burn” move than anything you can use tactically to your advantage.
For one thing, you can easily end up strengthening managers you’re more or less level with before the round.
Still, I understand the desire - to watch the world burn. It’s always tempting.
What's life without a little fun?
One of the greatest DMs vs a chaotic fun card which doesn't guarantee you anything apart from messing up others?
Remember; you need to pick up a keeper by end of R10.
Remember; you need to pick up a keeper by end of R10.
Pick them up asap. You'll regret it otherwise.Tell me about it...
I presume that it will possible to do so in R9 or R10 - or both.
Well, I don't actually presume it - but a man is allowed to hope, right?
Pick them up asap. You'll regret it otherwise.
Wasn't directed at you specifically. Should have written that.Hardly the greatest round for it.
But we'll see.
Except when he's up against your team, then he's not QF worthy.
Good to hear. We are aware it's different kind of fun to a regular draft, but I'm sure you all knew what was coming your way (or not, to be precise).Indeed. And to be fair, the round was fun.
Btw I'd personally prefer it if the special round is unveiled together with the criterion as I barely have any time to do any research in the middle of the day. Mind you, I do realise I could be in the minority here and a fair few might not have the time to research both their picks and the special event. I also do realise it's impossible to cater to the needs of all the managers and some are definitely bound to miss out, but I'm curious to know about the consensus of the managers regarding the timing of the release of the special event.
The timing doesn’t really matter to me - it’s more a question of precisely what the task is. If it requires too extensive research, I’ll likely leave it to others.
I take it as a matter of luck: If you get a question you’re actually pretty close to nailing, you do the research - if it seems a bit hopeless, you don’t.
My take on it.
Btw I'd personally prefer it if the special round is unveiled together with the criterion as I barely have any time to do any research in the middle of the day. Mind you, I do realise I could be in the minority here and a fair few might not have the time to research both their picks and the special event. I also do realise it's impossible to cater to the needs of all the managers and some are definitely bound to miss out, but I'm curious to know about the consensus of the managers regarding the timing of the release of the special event.
Yeah. P1 results are fine with me.I think it's done with p1 results so that the managers who get pass aren't sat around for 11 hours with nothing to do. This way if they get bored they have something they can try and figure out
+ 1 , Its 3 am here when the p1 results are announced. May be special rounds could be rotated so the next one happens at the p2 results and so on.Btw I'd personally prefer it if the special round is unveiled together with the criterion as I barely have any time to do any research in the middle of the day. Mind you, I do realise I could be in the minority here and a fair few might not have the time to research both their picks and the special event. I also do realise it's impossible to cater to the needs of all the managers and some are definitely bound to miss out, but I'm curious to know about the consensus of the managers regarding the timing of the release of the special event.
I wasn't really too bothered about it initially too and didn't mind leaving it to others, as I didn't believe it would impact me negatively too much, but let's just say my interest is piqued after the last chaotic bamboozle round.
Indeed.I think it's done with p1 results so that the managers who get pass aren't sat around for 11 hours with nothing to do. This way if they get bored they have something they can try and figure out
+ 1 , Its 3 am here when the p1 results are announced. May be special rounds could be rotated so the next one happens at the p2 results and so on.
Seems stupid to pass if you need a keeper.. Just sayin.
I couldn't even find a single keeper to match the criteria, not sure if you are just trolling me there hah
Seems stupid to pass if you need a keeper.. Just sayin.
Only two players will be great for me in the pool and I have absolutely no chance of getting others might be useful but either in positions I already covered and also it's the perfect round to pass so I can have a shot at the last one.If everyone's passing then it's going to be an easy round. Some real gems in this round.
Never got a chance to look at the pool, but even a handful of gems isn't going to go a long way in a pool of 15 managers or so.If everyone's passing then it's going to be an easy round. Some real gems in this round.
Never got a chance to look at the pool, but even a handful of gems isn't going to go a long way in a pool of 15 managers or so.
Yup. You passing as well?Never got a chance to look at the pool, but even a handful of gems isn't going to go a long way in a pool of 15 managers or so.
Nah, might have done if I'd had a chance to assess the pool, by the sounds of it, it could be quite thin. But when you're carrying 3 sheep you need to grab as many as players as you can.Yup. You passing as well?