Hernandez - BFA
The Way to Fly
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2011
- Messages
- 17,608
God, we are going to run out of regular voters with all of them becoming managers or AMs.
Speaking of, Annah, you shouldn't be PMing me asking when I will go for X or Y, you are Balu's AM AFAIK.
I say it here because we really really shouldn't be doing PMs, even with "neutrals" because they are bound to go throwing stuff around various inboxes. Exclusive AMs or watch from outside, period.
God, we are going to run out of regular voters with all of them becoming managers or AMs.
Speaking of, Annah, you shouldn't be PMing me asking when I will go for X or Y, you are Balu's AM AFAIK.
I say it here because we really really shouldn't be doing PMs, even with "neutrals" because they are bound to go throwing stuff around various inboxes. Exclusive AMs or watch from outside, period.
I like John O'Shea as a sheep a lot more. You can at least make up for a weakness in defense with strong teammates (a shit striker is basically useless in these drafts) and he's versatile, so there's a good chance, he can use him somewhere, if he ends up with a 2nd sheep along the way.
I'm a bit worried that we see a few 2nd and 3rd attempt picks later that are of similar quality though . Depends on how difficult the upcoming criterias are. Aldo should be able to judge that, if he doesn't believe he's too good a pick for a sheep, then I'd vote for him.
Are we making this a rule? I think it helps if managerial teams do their own research
Agreed. This can ruin this whole draftGod, we are going to run out of regular voters with all of them becoming managers or AMs.
Speaking of, Annah, you shouldn't be PMing me asking when I will go for X or Y, you are Balu's AM AFAIK.
I say it here because we really really shouldn't be doing PMs, even with "neutrals" because they are bound to go throwing stuff around various inboxes. Exclusive AMs or watch from outside, period.
Re: the sheep. I frankly don't care, I'm never going to play Heskey, let alone pick the right partner for him! It would mean my entire system being defined by the sheep, which is manic.
Veto or no veto, O'Shea would be a fitting pick when my second pick was Lahm and the third Luis Enrique. O'Shea is indeed someone I would plan to play and significantly inferior to anyone picked in that round, even anyone who could be picked this round.
But nope, go ahead, just pick someone to collect splinters.
Aldo, fun as discussing sheep is, I think the sheep picker needs nominating in each round. As I said even before I got mine, in the third round you usually pick and already picked player and whoever got your man should be assigned the task. The rest can suggest options, but someone has to be nominated to decide (Cutch in this case).
I'd be happy with Djemba Djemba, I could do with a midfielder just in case
Oh thank god... But he still has to be born past October 31st 1960 right? That rule is for the whole draft
Usually in this format the mod makes the final call, and I am following the same thing. It makes sense as well, as I am completely neutral. What if the appointed person gives you a right back when you already have one, or something? Or someone not bad enough to be a sheep? Just to keep it all clean I'm making the final call.
However I will not come up with any names unless absolutely necessary. It would be out of the names taken by you guys.
If it's a stupid pick you can overrule it. Anyhow, yeah, if you'd rather do it like this fair enough.
You have a point re: consistency of approach. Funny side story, from what I gather this was run in RAWK and someone picked as a much derided sheep then turned out to be a transfer target of theirs a couple of months later.
God, I shouldn't laugh, that could be us in a couple of months. Osman anyone?
That was a right laugh. That guy even edited that player's wiki with a lot of pisstake comments. It was actually hilarious, he had teamed up with someone and while he was away his AM picked this sheep type player and Kenny Dalglish went unpicked. That completely wrecked that guy when he was back and he went on a rampage against that rubbish (who now almost joined them) player.
I agree, sounds good to me.Yeah I don't mind at all if Jaybezia gets to do it.
God, we are going to run out of regular voters with all of them becoming managers or AMs.
Speaking of, Annah, you shouldn't be PMing me asking when I will go for X or Y, you are Balu's AM AFAIK.
I say it here because we really really shouldn't be doing PMs, even with "neutrals" because they are bound to go throwing stuff around various inboxes. Exclusive AMs or watch from outside, period.
Re: the sheep. I frankly don't care, I'm never going to play Heskey, let alone pick the right partner for him! It would mean my entire system being defined by the sheep, which is manic.
Veto or no veto, O'Shea would be a fitting pick when my second pick was Lahm and the third Luis Enrique. O'Shea is indeed someone I would plan to play and significantly inferior to anyone picked in that round, even anyone who could be picked this round.
But nope, go ahead, just pick someone to collect splinters.
THE REVISED DEADLINE RULESFor every round :
1. Pick 1 will span 24 hours.
You can change your pick anytime till the last minute of the deadline.
2. Pick 2 and 3 will span 12 hours.
You CAN NOT change your pick once you have sent the PM, so be absolutely careful. Hence, in both pick 2 and 3 of every round as soon as everyone has submitted his pick, the results will be revealed. If you are not sure about the pick, don't send early, in case you want to observe discussions or whatever, but once I get the PM it is set in stone for me.
This way we will potentially save 1 day in every round compared to previous rules which is a huge improvement. What we did yesterday is the perfect example of what these rules would apply.
Also,
A new criteria will always start (that is Pick 1) around noon and not at night.
Just for clarity for the likes of Edgar. Even if the second attempt is revealed early the deadline for the third attempt remains noon the next day, unless all picks are in before that.
Right?
I don't agree with this at all. Not fine by me. Giving a single poster the power to do itJaybezia shall decide sheep picks for every round from now on.
I don't agree with this at all. Not fine by me. Giving a single poster the power to do it