The First Redcafe Sheep Draft

So you could go for less fancied players in the first couple of rounds low balling their "value" to save money for the later rounds ?
Pretty much yeah but as it goes on top players keep getting sold for good amounts so you need to open your pocket sooner or later.

It is quite interesting actually unlike a Sheep Draft which is mainly based on luck as in that one you can plan your way. Then there are inflating for others, etc which make it great.
 
I'm booking a spot in the next draft too. Wether it's anto's sheep , auction realism(???) or a normal draft
I love these.
By the way, I have literally no idea where to go with my final pick
 
You just have to pray to the Gods you are online when the thread for the next draft is made so you can grab a spot.
 
The double rounds have taken their toll, no question about it. In retrospect I've been too fixated on the players I jotted down at first. It made things more complicated than necessary - especially in the last couple of rounds. Ah well, I'm fairly pleased. Have to go for a somewhat more cautious set-up - on the pitch - but that's fine.

And who knows what happens in the last round? Could change a great deal.
 
Again, whut ?

Yeah, an idea I had. These drafts managers decide formation and pick players. I was proposing a random pool of all time greats that will be randomly allotted on 2nd, 4th & 6th rounds. One random choice each for a defender, midfielder and striker. Managers to mould team to get the best of these 3. Which means till half the draft you can't decide on formation.

Worth a try or just should I forget?
 
Yeah, an idea I had. These drafts managers decide formation and pick players. I was proposing a random pool of all time greats that will be randomly allotted on 2nd, 4th & 6th rounds. One random choice each for a defender, midfielder and striker. Managers to mould team to get the best of these 3. Which means till half the draft you can't decide on formation.

Worth a try or just should I forget?

Sounds different. A combination of that and Sheep rules would be hilarious.
 
Yeah, an idea I had. These drafts managers decide formation and pick players. I was proposing a random pool of all time greats that will be randomly allotted on 2nd, 4th & 6th rounds. One random choice each for a defender, midfielder and striker. Managers to mould team to get the best of these 3. Which means till half the draft you can't decide on formation.

Worth a try or just should I forget?

Sounds like the manager will be stuck with an insanely unpredictable Director of Football - I like it.
 
Anto should never be allowed to run a draft!!
Round 9 Pick 1 Results


antohan - Pass and Pass

AWESOME! Without a shadow of a doubt the best side I've drafted pre-reinforcements. Brilliant, love it!

Chesterlestreet - Pass and Fail (Manuel Amoros)
MJJ - Pass and Fail (Manuel Amoros)

I fecking hope one of you too did. No? :(
 
Always thought "trades" should be available as well. I know it kind of defeats the point but if we were to do a humongous mega draft one time then I think it could work.
 
AWESOME! Without a shadow of a doubt the best side I've drafted pre-reinforcements. Brilliant, love it!



I fecking hope one of you too did. No? :(

Why was my post quoted in there?
 
Re: the whole ineligible pick discussion. Yes, I would make that FAIL - ineligible player.

I'm not sure you guys realise the amount of work placed on the mods to double and triple check all sorts of shit. My take on that is it shouldn't be necessary because YOU should be trusted to have done the due dilligence properly. If I have to be arsed go check because it looks fishy and you've cocked up, YOU have cocked up. If I don't check and when results are announced people notice something is wrong YOU have cocked up.

So YOU miss out. Simple.
 
Speaking of rules, one thing I wasn't clear on here was what happened when one of the two players had two stints at the club, sharing one with the other chap. It's quite common that people start and finish their careers at one club, does that rule out all those who played under both stints?

It is topical as it actually applies to Amoros!
 
Are you with MJJ, Trip? Can't keep track of all these AMs.

Oh, and Anto - if you were referring to HIM just now...it wasn't on. His time at a certain club coincides with that of the player who got blocked.

So you can pick him now. feck RBs!

God, I'm going to be so upset if he isn't picked :(
 
So by the time the last couple of picks take place, let me elaborate on the Banned List Round.

THE BANNED LIST ROUND
The next round is what we will call the Banned List Round. In this, all managers will get one chance per round to get a player from The Banned List.

This is how it works.

In Round 10, all managers will nominate two players, one they want to pick and one they want to block from The Banned List. The player you choose to block will be blocked from that Stage (there will be stages instead of Picks in this round), and if anyone else picks that player, even if he was the only one to pick him he will be blocked.

Basically you get your player IF :

1. No one else has picked him.
2. No one else has blocked him.

Now, there are a couple of guidelines on who you can block :

a. You cannot block the player you have picked in the same stage.
b. You can only block and pick a player once.

Now I will explain the concept of a "Stage". There will be 3 stages, that is Stage 1, 2 and 3.

In Stage 1, everyone will send me the player they want to pick and the player they want to block. After the results are revealed, the players who were blocked due to duplicate picks or manager blocks will go back into the pool and there won't be another Banned List or something. So even if a player was blocked in Stage 1, he can still be picked in Stage 2.

Now, managers who get their players in Stage 1 will not "pick" any player in the next two stages, however they can still "block" a player in the next two stages. Same goes for those who get a player in Stage 2, they can only "block" in the next stage but not "pick".

Now, you can only attempt to pick a player once, same as block. Once you have "picked" or "blocked" someone in Stage 1 you cant pick or block him again in Stage 2 or 3.

So say if you pick Nesta in Stage 1 and fail due to one of the two reasons, you cannot go for him again in the next two stages.

Same goes for Block, if you blocked say Maldini in Stage 1, you cannot block him in any future stage. So plan your picks and blocks carefully.

At the end those who manage to get a player at the end of the round will be able to swap him with any player in their existing 12 man squad.

The end squads will all be of 12. That is the reason we are swapping the player picked in this round instead of adding it, to have the same squad size for each manager.

Questions/Doubts, please raise them.
 
Last edited:
Speaking of rules, one thing I wasn't clear on here was what happened when one of the two players had two stints at the club, sharing one with the other chap. It's quite common that people start and finish their careers at one club, does that rule out all those who played under both stints?

It is topical as it actually applies to Amoros!

It came up with me with a Brazilian winger and German defender. They were there at the club at the same time though so I just assumed it wouldn't get through.
 
The way I interpret it, it's quite simple: A and B can't have been at the club at the same time. So the one stint in your example would cancel the other one out, as it were.
 
Speaking of rules, one thing I wasn't clear on here was what happened when one of the two players had two stints at the club, sharing one with the other chap. It's quite common that people start and finish their careers at one club, does that rule out all those who played under both stints?

It is topical as it actually applies to Amoros!
They can have 10 stints at the same club, but they just cannot be at the same club at any time, simple as that. If they overlapped even for half a season, it's invalid.
 
BTW, Chesterle, you got lucky I prioritised CB in the last round. I spent ages mulling over Larsson!
 
They can have 10 stints at the same club, but they just cannot be at the same club at any time, simple as that. If they overlapped even for half a season, it's invalid.

So if they both played for two clubs, didn't share any time in one but did in another, it was out? Christ, that would have ruled out 4-5 other options I looked into... maybe my Uruguayan ones. Feel really bad about not giving a couple of them a run-out.
 
So if they both played for two clubs, didn't share any time in one but did in another, it was out? Christ, that would have ruled out 4-5 other options I looked into... maybe my Uruguayan ones. Feel really bad about not giving a couple of them a run-out.
no no.

That's why you had to tell me the club as well. It's for that club that the overlap makes them invalid.
 
No! Because I have to pick a player who played for X, the club of the passed player. And X isn't HIS club.

Oh, I see, the ones who dominated the noughties I guess. Ouch! Go find a RB outside the period of the other guy... Tough, that's why I looked at a different team with two peaks twenty sides apart!
 
Oh, I see, the ones who dominated the noughties I guess. Ouch! Go find a RB outside the period of the other guy... Tough, that's why I looked at a different team with two peaks twenty sides apart!

Aye, it's a right mess, actually. I've picked my man. Hardly spectacular - but a seasoned pro who'll do a job for me.
 
no no.

That's why you had to tell me the club as well. It's for that club that the overlap makes them invalid.

Never mind, I got my boys :drool:

Had completely forgotten about the winger's pre-EPL origins, once I homed in there BOOM!