Well OK, but then the next question is why would a democracy build in that legal power for a person to unilaterally override a court decision? It seems distinctly undemocratic. If there is a proven miscarriage of justice the courts have the power to set aside the conviction.Because it is legal and part of their powers of office. I already stated what I think pardons should be used for. If someone wants to run on some kind of pardon reform, I mean great. I don't think it would get anywhere at this point. And there are many other more important things to focus political energy on.
My awful governor used his pardon power to pardon a murderer Abbot Pardons murderer Cleaning this up and making sure it couldn't happen somehow is great. But, realistically the political power and effort I dont see it happening.
Yes, I get that, but why ?Because it is legal and part of their powers of office. I already stated what I think pardons should be used for. If someone wants to run on some kind of pardon reform, I mean great. I don't think it would get anywhere at this point. And there are many other more important things to focus political energy on.
My awful governor used his pardon power to pardon a murderer Abbot Pardons murderer Cleaning this up and making sure it couldn't happen somehow is great. But, realistically the political power and effort I dont see it happening.
Well OK, but then the next question is why would a democracy build in that legal power for a person to unilaterally override a court decision? It seems distinctly undemocratic. If there is a proven miscarriage of justice the courts have the power to set aside the conviction.
This is not like pardoning turkeys (who haven't been convicted of any crime).
The US isn't a democracy, it's a Republic. Powers are not meant to be fully democratic.
Pardons for everyone yay.
It's like the middleages over there.
They should give the president a fecking sword and a throne. Feck it.
They couldn't find evidence of anything they were accusing him of, namely any illegal selling of the family's name or "Biden crime family" nonsense. What he did get convicted of is not what he was dragged across the committees for.
Yes, I get that, but why ?
To rephrase my original question: What was the original logic behind giving Presidents the power to pardon?
OkHilarious
The whataboutism is strong on this one.
Just a nobody but still funny
No, you are not.Am I getting insane? How are people here defending this shit. Supposed institutionalist Joe "nobody is above the law"** Biden
** does not pertain to the immediate Biden family
If your only argument is "the other guy did it first" then you basically are without arguments. The whole selling point of the Democrats was some sort of integrity and normalcy and respect for the rule of law. This action shat on top of it all.
Exactly this. We've been on a drastic downward spiral for the past 8 years, when it comes to morals, ethics, decorum and anything else that makes for what most religions or simply common sense would dictate makes for a good person. Kids growing up now will see it as normal.No, you are not.
You are just witnessing people's flimsy moral compass completely implode, and by extension the slow disintegration of a society, its valors and its way of life.
It's absolutely fascinating and worthy of popcorn if not the dramatic consequences in the next years.
Historians will have a field day with what happened in 2016-2024 and its future implications.
It's a beautiful thing to see America finally united, as Dems and MAGA spout identical talking points.He's a person who has been the victim of a relentless political hit campaign for like 5 years. It was the laptop nonsense for most of that time until their key witness admitted in court it was basically all bullshit. They tried everything until they were lucky enough to find something that stuck. They then wouldn't even let him plead guilty, so they could drag it on for the show of it, then sentenced him over and above the norm for what he was convicted of.
Corruption all the way through. The people who have been doing this are about to seize total control of the US and have been openly stating they are going to go after all their opponents. Its likely they won't leave Hunter alone, their focus on him has been a winning strategy (somehow) so they'll continue with it.
It seems like a proper use of presidential pardon powers tbh and the fact that he's his son probably shouldn't effect the decision. Remains to be seen whether it'll even matter however, when they control the courts...
Why are so many of you parroting this when nobody suggested any such thing?Guys don't worry, as soon as the election is over he'll finally be free to do something about israel.
The real issue is that he promised that he wouldn't and now has. The justification that he is being prosecuted and perused in a way almost anyone else wouldn't because he is Biden's son is likely true (more in the being prosecuted to the full extent of the law - not that he is innocent) in that just about nobody is prosecuted for such a false statement on a gun form when no adverse outcome resulted and the tax authority usually give a slap on the writ to someone who made similar tax misdeclaration as long as they pay any fines and interest etc. Plus who knows what that lunatic Trump will do when he is president again.Am I getting insane? How are people here defending this shit. Supposed institutionalist Joe "nobody is above the law"** Biden
** does not pertain to the immediate Biden family
If your only argument is "the other guy did it first" then you basically are without arguments. The whole selling point of the Democrats was some sort of integrity and normalcy and respect for the rule of law. This action shat on top of it all.
Not at State level he can't, and nothing Biden has or hasn't done will stop Trump doing anything he can to benefit himself. This makes no difference.Biden pardoned his son, because his prosecution was "for political reasons".
Amazing pass to Trump. He can now pardon himself, because his prosecution was "for political reasons".
The real issue is that he promised that he wouldn't and now has. The justification that he is being prosecuted and perused in a way almost anyone else wouldn't because he is Biden's son is likely true (more in the being prosecuted to the full extent of the law - not that he is innocent) in that just about nobody is prosecuted for such a false statement on a gun form when no adverse outcome resulted and the tax authority usually give a slap on the writ to someone who made similar tax misdeclaration as long as they pay any fines and interest etc. Plus who knows what that lunatic Trump will do when he is president again.
So I can see what he did it but he really shouldn't have said he wouldn't if that wasn't set in stone.
Not at State level he can't, and nothing Biden has or hasn't done will stop Trump doing anything he can to benefit himself. This makes no difference.
Of course I do. What a silly thing to suggest.Do you really believe that if Hunter had actually killed someone, Biden would not pardon him at this point?
Do you really believe that if Hunter had actually killed someone, Biden would not pardon him at this point?
And no matter what Trump will do whatever he can to benefit himself. Hunter Biden's pardon makes zero difference to this.Theoretically, yes.
In practice, nothing will happen. In NY, Trump was scheduled to be sentenced on Nov. 26. It was postponed indefinitely. And I bet that all charges will be dropped at some point.
Of course I do. What a silly thing to suggest.
And no matter what Trump will do whatever he can to benefit himself. Hunter Biden's pardon makes zero difference to this.
They couldn't find evidence of anything they were accusing him of, namely any illegal selling of the family's name or "Biden crime family" nonsense. What he did get convicted of is not what he was dragged across the committees for.
Specific dates of the pardon is a concern, seems to tie Hunter in with the Ukraine stuff when Joe Biden was VP
Blue collar people or indeed any other voter have already voted. Trump will now do whatever he want to benefit himself. He won't even have to show restrains to try to get elected again. Hunter Biden's pardon makes zero difference.I disagree. For many people it makes a huge difference. Of course not for the Trump cultists, or the "Trump is Hitler" cultists. For these two groups nothing makes a difference! But both these extremist groups are actually small percentages of the total population.
But for the average blue collar people, if Biden says there are "politically motivated prosecutions", and Trump says the same thing ... then it is perhaps true.
So you leap to Biden giving a pardon to murder because he is old and has a wife, and you have met an old man with a wife before? Ok then.At this point, Biden has nothing to lose. Pelosi and many other Dems have blamed him for losing these elections. And they are right.
Biden is gone anyway, I am not even sure if he is the one who makes these decisions or someone else, for example his wife. I have met old people like that, and it usually their wives that decide for everything.
What many people suggested is that Biden's actions were largely determined by electoral considerations. That would imply that, once electoral considerations were no longer on the table, you'd see some change. That hasn't happened, because that explanation was always an excuse.Why are so many of you parroting this when nobody suggested any such thing?
People suggested that Harris would be better than Biden on this issue, and lots better than Trump, but nobody suggested that Biden would do a 180 as soon as the election was over. If you ever expect any US President to fully take the Palestinian side, especially while Hamas and Hezbollah still exist (and not even then most likely), then you are dreaming. The real comparison for US citizens on this issue was who would be least terrible for Palestinians, Harris or Trump? Anyone who thought Trump plainly hasn't been watching or remember his last term - remember him moving the Embassy to Jerusalem?
Many people suggested that Harris would moderate the US position to some degree if elected. Nobody suggested that Biden would before Trump took office, in the event that Harris didn't win.What many people suggested is that Biden's actions were largely determined by electoral considerations. That would imply that, once electoral considerations were no longer on the table, you'd see some change. That hasn't happened, because that explanation was always an excuse.
He's a person who has been the victim of a relentless political hit campaign for like 5 years. It was the laptop nonsense for most of that time until their key witness admitted in court it was basically all bullshit. They tried everything until they were lucky enough to find something that stuck. They then wouldn't even let him plead guilty, so they could drag it on for the show of it, then sentenced him over and above the norm for what he was convicted of.
Corruption all the way through. The people who have been doing this are about to seize total control of the US and have been openly stating they are going to go after all their opponents. Its likely they won't leave Hunter alone, their focus on him has been a winning strategy (somehow) so they'll continue with it.
It seems like a proper use of presidential pardon powers tbh and the fact that he's his son probably shouldn't effect the decision. Remains to be seen whether it'll even matter however, when they control the courts...
Many people suggested that Harris would moderate the US position to some degree if elected. Nobody suggested that Biden would before Trump took office, in the event that Harris didn't win.