UnrelatedPsuedo
I pity the poor fool who stinks like I do!
America is fcuking weird. Supposed Left wing folks imagining McCain in heaven....
One gracious concession speech in 2008 was all it took. Before that he was some senile old racistAmerica is fcuking weird. Supposed Left wing folks imagining McCain in heaven....
So here is a loaded question for whoever feels comfortable getting into it - but at least from my perspective it appears a lot of folks with Indian backgrounds and involved in politics in one way or another seem to be relatively to extremely conservative (a Dinesh D'Souza is one of those extremes for example). Obviously Harris is also quite the opposite of someone subscribing to a bunch of liberal ideas.
Why is that? Seems to obviously not just be isolated to the US as the Patel example in the UK shows, and though I havent paid attention much to Canada - I would suspect its the same there. Is that perspective wrong? And if not - why is it that way? I presume we have a bunch of folks reading this who are either Indian or of Indian descent and Im genuinely curious.
One gracious concession speech in 2008 was all it took. Before that he was some senile old racist
Why do people assume everyone wants free universal Healthcare. Majority dont want them.
So here is a loaded question for whoever feels comfortable getting into it - but at least from my perspective it appears a lot of folks with Indian backgrounds and involved in politics in one way or another seem to be relatively to extremely conservative (a Dinesh D'Souza is one of those extremes for example). Obviously Harris is also quite the opposite of someone subscribing to a bunch of liberal ideas.
Why is that? Seems to obviously not just be isolated to the US as the Patel example in the UK shows, and though I havent paid attention much to Canada - I would suspect its the same there. Is that perspective wrong? And if not - why is it that way? I presume we have a bunch of folks reading this who are either Indian or of Indian descent and Im genuinely curious.
This is where a loss was a win. Don’t think Stacey Abrams would have had the impact she did in GA if she had won the governor’s race in 2018.If the Democrats don't flip the senate by winning the run-offs in Georgia, then it becomes irrelevant. The only way to pass legislation will be through compromise with the GOP and by definition some kind of bipartisan centrism.
If the Dems do flip the senate, then yeah, it'll be a real fight over how to change America. And that will be a good thing!
Yet they control the levers of emotional power so well.The modern day Republican party has no interest in being bipartisan. They're never worried about upsetting liberals infact they spend most of their time purposefully upsetting liberals.
Universal healthcare, free public education, a living wage, decisive action on climate change, dismantling the military industrial complex are not some pie in the sky far fetched left looney ideas, they are ideas supported by a majority of Americans according to all the polls even the FOX News polls.
Which says a lot about where liberalism is today. Again check the thread I posted on the last page. Harris is a conservative.Also the comparison of Kamala Harris with Priti Patel is laughable. That's like saying Hillary Clinton is same as Thatcher or worse even La Pen. Kamala Harris is not a progressive but she is your bog standard liberal Democrat. Hard conservatives don't get selected as senators from California, establishment liberals do.
Even if they win the two run-offs, they’d still only have 50 seats. They would need complete unity to pass legislation - senators like Joe Manchin aren’t gonna go along with packing the court. No chance.What are the odds that Dems will win the 2 votes in Ga,.have control of the senate and do nothing like packing the court or pass real meaningful measures but continue to keep reaching out to the right wing mofos.
They have the tie break vote. They should try instead of sitting on their assesEven if they win the two run-offs, they’d still only have 50 seats. They would need complete unity to pass legislation - senators like Joe Manchin aren’t gonna go along with packing the court. No chance.
“Joe Manchin will you vote for packing the court?”They have the tie break vote. They should try instead of sitting on their asses
I saw someone say that the run-offs will be the difference between the median Senator being Collins, Murkowski or Manchin, which I think is a good way of thinking about it. That said, there's a pretty big gap between what you can pass if you have one of the Repubs or Manchin, as well as who you can appoint. Important to have the majority as well.“Joe Manchin will you vote for packing the court?”
“No.”
Same reason Obama was forced to drop the public option from the ACA.
Definitely! It would make a huge difference.I saw someone say that the run-offs will be the difference between the median Senator being Collins, Murkowski or Manchin, which I think is a good way of thinking about it. That said, there's a pretty big gap between what you can pass if you have one of the Repubs or Manchin, as well as who you can appoint. Important to have the majority as well.
Yeah, think Manchin has spoken against removing the filibuster too. Although, he was clearly annoyed in how the GOP behaved with Coney-Barrett. But realistically all that stuff needed a wave election and about 52 in the Senate. The alternatives now are - broadly supportive of the agenda vs complete intransigence.Definitely! It would make a huge difference.
But people thinking they’d be able to pack the court or make DC a state are badly deluded. They might not even be able to get rid of the filibuster.
Can't see this happening but epic trolling if true:
Quit slandering people like a moron.
Biden in a 3 year sample of his political career has probably done more good than someone like you ever will your entire life.
Which says a lot about where liberalism is today. Again check the thread I posted on the last page. Harris is a conservative.
Just stop.
Was McCain a racist? I don’t remember anything about it. He was Bush 2.0 though.One gracious concession speech in 2008 was all it took. Before that he was some senile old racist
Not really. It actually was overt racism in detestable robocalls that derailed his 2000 campaign in South Carolina.Was McCain a racist? I don’t remember anything about it. He was Bush 2.0 though.
Just stop with not using baseless allegation as rape? Don't be stupid.
Why do people assume everyone wants free universal Healthcare. Majority dont want them.
i
It's a stupid idea anyways. MA has a Republican governor, which would mean she would be replace by a Republican in the Senate. Same with Sanders.
You claiming Biden did more good in any 3 years of his life than someone who you don't know is a baseless allegation. If you have a point you can make it without those types of posts.
Was McCain a racist? I don’t remember anything about it.
Brings a tear to one's eye. Reminds me of that one scene from lion king as well. Sniff sniff.America is fcuking weird. Supposed Left wing folks imagining McCain in heaven....
McCain campaigns for George Wallace, Jr.
Why do people assume everyone wants free universal Healthcare. Majority dont want them.