jymufc20
Last Man Standing finalist 2019/20
I don't understand why Woodward would brief the press over this, surely this will just cause animosity.
The Varane thing is a stupid thing to make public, is it any wonder the club get fleeced by everyone across EuropeIt's laughable that Woodward leaks he wanted to pay 100m for Varane, he should hire Wenger as our next manager and they can talk about all the players they nearly signed.
The Glazers are parasites who are content with top 4, they have no intention to compete with City.
How many leagues and champions leagues has Woodward won? Toby would have been a huge addition.
There weren't any serious signs that he did. Mourinho couldn't have made it clearer in February that he wasn't after any attacking signings in the summer, Mourinho himself said Young could play 50+ games next season and Shaw said Mourinho sent him positive texts over summer about his chances next season.
They got conned good and proper All that noise and 'leaks' about PSG probably got Ed in a panic, who probably didn't want to start shopping for a new manager.
He should have been more clever though as Jose did the exact same thing in his last season at Chelsea.
Different times tho, mate.Not for me mate, i think it's far too many players who could go over the hill at the same time and would need replaced in a short timeframe. 2 thirds of the team around 30 and no players under 25.
I tend to agree with Fergusons general philosophy on team building he explained in one of his books. It was always the goal to have the team in a position that it could evolve gradually, and age was a big part of his philosophy. Moving on a few players each summer to be replace by younger ones.
So i can't remember it exactly but it was something like only ever having 2-3 players around 30 in your first team, never more than 2-3 around 20 and the rest somewhere in between was basically the gist of it.
Absolutely agree with this policy. Pathetic need to sign ready made players at their peak. Get the best out of the players you have. Coach some attacking play into the team.
If you can't do that, it's not worth investing more in you
At least it's something.Yeah, my bad. Problem solved.
Obviously, I'm reluctant to delve too deep into this discussion without proof that the article is genuine, but if there is a shred of evidence suggesting that Woody and the board are refusing to both buy the players Jose has requested and sell the ones he deems surplus to requirements, then they are blatantly undermining his management of the club. To think that people of little to no footballing background such as the Glazers and Woody believing they know better than a manager of Jose Mourinho's experience is quite frankly shocking.
It stinks of a deeper issue with Jose and the board. Maybe they are attempting to get him to walk, and if that is the case then Jose should do just that.
It's all conjecture at this point though. None of us truly know what is going on.
Not having a go for Lenglet and Malcom was baffling
I’m perversely happy with our lack of activity too. Let’s see him get the current lot to play a tune. They’re better than we saw last season. If he can’t do that, then cheerio. Time for a fresh start.
And what if Jose wanted to play 3 CB's at the back, compared to last season? It isn't his job to identify targets or line up.Perhaps his thinking is that we've already signed two CBs for the current manager and whatever Levy demands is just not reasonable for Alderweireld?
Especially since we saw first hand how good he can be. Then again there are other CBs out there, who we could sign.
If people seriously think Alderweireld is short term then please give me a list of players better than him for less/similar money?
So what is the choice? Do we wait for Varane to become available or should we get the next best available defender ? I think the latter is more logical. To let the club fall behind it's competitors is more fiscally irresponsible in the long term than spending big money on a world class defender who's 30 yrs old.Woodward is a clown largely due to the manager choices but he can't sign players the manager doesn't want. Mourinho was dead set on signing a centre half which would have cost a tonne of money.
Why are 28 year old players suddenly seen as "over the hill"? You can easily get 4-5 years of top quality from them.
Yeah because buying ready made players has worked out terribly for Madrid. 4 European cups in 5 years and the most successful team in history.
Rojo who's been given a new contract by Mourinho.Good.
They’re sick if spunking money on the likes of Lindelof, a player not good enough and needs upgrading 12 months later.
He’s happy with Jones and Smalling else he would have sold them by now and he bought Bailly and Lindelof, there’s also Rojo so the board must be wondering why he wants another cb.
Err yes it is. What planet do you live in?
First of all vast majority of managers out there don’t even get to pick players at all, they get picked by the board. You think Lopetegui at Real tells Florentino who to buy? Pull another one.
Secondly even if the players listen to managers to an extent they can disagree and block them when the deal makes no financial sense. Happens routinely. Spending exorbitant fees for over 30s is a classic no-no for boards unless the player in question is Ronaldo-Messi. That same fee might be available for a 25yo.
It really depends, and it isn't a matter of trust. Ed wants United to be good for years to come, Mourinho might not care about it and want to sign a few players for whatever they cost, try to get a title/UCL and then leave the squad in a mess (he won't care what happens when he leaves). Which might explain Ed's reluctance to spend a shitload of money on players around 30 years old and to give up on Martial.
It is more that they have different goals. Considering that I plan to watch United even when Mourinho leaves, I am afraid that I back Ed in this case (not that it matters in any case).
If you look at Real's best players of the last 5 seasons, how old were they when they signed? Ronaldo, Bale, Benzema, Isco, Varane, Modric, Kroos, Marcelo etc...? All <26 years old is the answer.
Got no idea. Might have been the case if we were going for a formation change. With the Martial issues there's a chance Mourinho changed his mind about the attacking signing but we would have needed to have sold him first.So what was the second signing he would have liked:
"I would like two more players. I don't think I'm going to have two," he said. "I think it's possible I'm going to have one.
Maybe he wanted two CB's?
Issue with Alderweireld was Spurs wanting £70M for someone who'll cost £25M in a year's time and has just come off an injury that kept him out a while. Not even City would pay that if they knew he'd be coming to them the following season for the lower price.If people seriously think Alderweireld is short term then please give me a list of players better than him for less/similar money?
I don't understand why Woodward would brief the press over this, surely this will just cause animosity.
Wanting to buy top class players, rather than overpriced short-term fixes on average players makes sense until you remember that we are playing converted mediocre wingers as our first choice full-backs. The notion that there wasnt anyone available in the world who would be an improvement is laughable - especially if you add in the claim that we would have been willing to spend £100m on a CB.
I don't buy it at all.
I don't understand why Woodward would brief the press over this, surely this will just cause animosity.
Alder is nowhere as good as Varane, is 4 years older, and probably doesn't have any advertisement value (unlike Varane who was overhyped since he was 18 or so and was mentioned as the next big thing when it comes to defenders).Seems just bizarre.
So the board said 100 million for Varane or no one else? I get that Varane is a fantastic player but in what world is Alderwield not even close?
We really need new blood for some positive today. If we don't win tomorrow the knives are going to be out. Jose now has the fans on his side .
Found a piece in the Guardian. Mindblowing stuff altogether.
THEN WHY DID YOU HIRE THE MISERABLE TWAT, YOU GOGGLE EYED DIPSHIT?!?
*and breath*
Obviously hope it’s all paper talk but why in the hell is Woodward even allowed an opinion on who to sign? Or are there other, actual football people, in the mix here? Sir Bob?!
The money isn't going to get saved up for a rainy day. It's going right in the shareholder's pockets. The Glazers are adding an incredible amount of money to their own private wealth every year off the back of the Man Utd brand. They should absolutely be reinvesting a huge chunk of it into the squad each season. Man Utd should be shopping for players from Harrods, not raking around in the Lidl bargain bin just because it's better value.
I wonder why the fans didn t see it comingA 'win at all costs' quick fix manager wanting to sign players that are ... wait for it ... quick fix. Although I agree with Woody's current stance you've got to wonder why he and the board didn't see this coming when they hired Mourinho. Baffling management all around.
Because the club is getting shit on for being incompetent in the transfer market and Ed is taking the brunt of that blame. This press briefing puts the club and Ed in better light and essentially names Jose as a short-termist. It’s been a success too as the majority of fans appear to be siding with the club here.