The Argument for Giggs as our Next Manager

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yep, it happened before too. Not long ago, April 2013.
Moyes? Guy shot himself in the foot as soon as he sacked the backroom.

I don't particular care what you think tho, if Giggs is our next manager I'm 100% behind him, if he isn't then I hope whoever is becomes the 2nd coming just like I would hope for Giggs. I don't buy into all these opinions about what Giggs does or doesn't know, because let's face it, it's based on nothing, and don't get me started on these co92 conspiracies...
 
Maybe Giggs has to gain more experience at another club before trying his luck at United?
 
You guys have your minds made up and set against it, never mind what others have to a say about it, some a whole lot more in the know than yourselves.

This conspiracy that some have invented regarding the co92 and their sinister plan to gain control is fcuking hysterical... redcafe gon redcafe.

When people respond with, "You've made your mind up.", it usually means that someone else holds a contrary opinion which they're sticking too, and the person making the statement doesn't like that. Don't get me wrong, you'd be right if someone refused to back Giggs when he was appointed, but many simply feel that he'd be a shite manager for us. And that's fine. It's a perfectly legitimate opinion to have.

I think you've got a good point with the second part though. This idea that the Class of 92 are all secretly plotting to take complete control of Manchester United is verging on a really bad idea for a fanfiction story. They often back each other, and are reluctant to ever criticise each other as you'd expect, but that applies across the British media: see pundits struggling to criticise Rooney right now. A lot of former players/coaches are all mates with each other, and will generally hold back with opinions. It's not just the Class of 92.
 
Because none of that is a substitute for the actual job of having the whole football club's success or failure rest on your shoulders, which is the case for an actual manager. We have seen lots of actual trained coaches who have spent sizable amounts of time under a top manager learning all they could and experiencing success along the way, only to fail to translate that to success as an actual manager at the very top. Appointing Giggs is romanticism at it's finest, it's hoping that he'll do a Pep when Pep is an exception to the rule rather than the rule and also a man that inherited a squad with 3 of the best players on the world in it in a much less competitive league.

so you are saying we shouldn't do what Barca did with Pep himself and give Giggs a chance - prior to taking the job Pep had only looked after the Barca B team and got some experience that way. He had of course worked under a number of top managers and they decided to take a chance which proved successful. Why wouldn't we do that with Giggs....I'd say giving Pep the chance was something in the pipeline for a while and not just a romantic gesture on their part.

If Giggs is being primed to be the successor to Van Gaal and that is something that has been discussed openly then its because they respect his ability, they understand his qualities and they see him as a strong candidate to be successful as manager...it's ridiculous to suggest the board would simply consider him because of his past standing at the club - this has been a long term decision and he has been readied for it

there are areas where Giggs is untested.....being in charge when shit happens for example but, as Mourinho shows now, there are no guarantees.... in any appointment there is an element of risk - I think Giggs is certainly worth it based on the fact that he has been prepared as a long term option for manager since Fergie retired and perhaps earlier than that based on what the great man said himself

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/manchester-united-legend-sir-alex-6579228
 
Moyes? Guy shot himself in the foot as soon as he sacked the backroom.

I don't particular care what you think tho, if Giggs is our next manager I'm 100% behind him, if he isn't then I hope whoever is becomes the 2nd coming just like I would hope for Giggs. I don't buy into all these opinions about what Giggs does or doesn't know, because let's face it, it's based on nothing, and don't get me started on these co92 conspiracies...

Moyes shot himself in the foot plenty of times, but he just wasn't good enough to be our manager in the first place. It wasn't any of his particular blunders, as bad as they often were, that consigned his fate: it was the fact that he was a remarkably average manager for the top level.

I'm sure most of the people (myself included), would be fully behind Giggs if he was appointed. There's a difference between ardently being against a managerial appointment, and then actively hoping we don't do well and not backing us if it happens. We all want Giggs to succeed, but many of us think he's potentially a disaster, and that's a fair opinion to have considering the guy has next to no managerial experience.
 
Giggs as manager is simply maximum reward/risk.

As one of the most popular players in our history, him producing as manager would probably put him out on his own in legendary terms.

However, if it went tits up, it could well undo some of his legend. Which would be a real shame.
 
so you are saying we shouldn't do what Barca did with Pep himself and give Giggs a chance - prior to taking the job Pep had only looked after the Barca B team and got some experience that way. He had of course worked under a number of top managers and they decided to take a chance which proved successful. Why wouldn't we do that with Giggs....I'd say giving Pep the chance was something in the pipeline for a while and not just a romantic gesture on their part.

If Giggs is being primed to be the successor to Van Gaal and that is something that has been discussed openly then its because they respect his ability, they understand his qualities and they see him as a strong candidate to be successful as manager...it's ridiculous to suggest the board would simply consider him because of his past standing at the club - this has been a long term decision and he has been readied for it

there are areas where Giggs is untested.....being in charge when shit happens for example but, as Mourinho shows now, there are no guarantees.... in any appointment there is an element of risk - I think Giggs is certainly worth it based on the fact that he has been prepared as a long term option for manager since Fergie retired and perhaps earlier than that based on what the great man said himself

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/manchester-united-legend-sir-alex-6579228

The problem with talking about the board appointing him based on logic is that this is the board who viewed David Moyes as the logical successor to Fergie, which was an appalling decision.

I don't doubt that we're preparing him to be manager at some stage, but that's only good if he's going to be a good manager, which is rather gigantic if. Should it turn out he's not particularly suited to the job, the experience he'll have gained won't really help him, in the same way we could've had Moyes as assistant manager for decades and he'd have probably still been a bit shite in the end.
 
You've precisely laid out the case against him. None of the characteristics you cited demonstrate a qualified track record of already haven proven himself as a manager. If he's a good manager, then he should go off and prove it at a smaller club as the likes of Ole and Keano have attempted, prior to being gifted the biggest job in world football.

another way to look at it is the David Moyes experience

cut his teeth in the lower leagues with Preston and in the Premier League with Everton

completely different experience to being manager of Manchester United.....

there's a case to be argued for Giggs getting experience as an apprentice to the current manager don't you think? It depends on the experience he is getting - we don't know Giggs role in the Moyes/Van Gaal management teams - is he a strong character? Is he a Yes man? who knows

I just question the experiences of teams at smaller clubs when preparing for the top job - it' a totally different situation and environment
 
Moyes? Guy shot himself in the foot as soon as he sacked the backroom.

I don't particular care what you think tho, if Giggs is our next manager I'm 100% behind him, if he isn't then I hope whoever is becomes the 2nd coming just like I would hope for Giggs. I don't buy into all these opinions about what Giggs does or doesn't know, because let's face it, it's based on nothing, and don't get me started on these co92 conspiracies...
We have a badass here. Who likes to reply to people for whom he doesn't care what they think.

Have a cookie!
 
Giggs as manager is simply maximum reward/risk.

As one of the most popular players in our history, him producing as manager would probably put him out on his own in legendary terms.

However, if it went tits up, it could well undo some of his legend. Which would be a real shame.

It'd never undo his legendary status as a player: that's cemented in for life. What it would potentially do if he fails is mean that should he then succeed later in his managerial career, when he's got more experience, he'd probably never get another crack at it.
 
When people respond with, "You've made your mind up.", it usually means that someone else holds a contrary opinion which they're sticking too, and the person making the statement doesn't like that. Don't get me wrong...
No, you're right, it does wind me up a bit when posters make Giggs out to be some clueless chancer, usually as if they know it as fact. But it's redcafe, I'm used to it...
 
We have a badass here. Who likes to reply to people for whom he doesn't care what they think.

Have a cookie!
How old are you? You're better than this Revan... How does that make me a bad ass? Should I care what you think?
 
another way to look at it is the David Moyes experience

cut his teeth in the lower leagues with Preston and in the Premier League with Everton

completely different experience to being manager of Manchester United.....

there's a case to be argued for Giggs getting experience as an apprentice to the current manager don't you think? It depends on the experience he is getting - we don't know Giggs role in the Moyes/Van Gaal management teams - is he a strong character? Is he a Yes man? who knows

I just question the experiences of teams at smaller clubs when preparing for the top job - it' a totally different situation and environment

I think there's just too much at stake to even entertain the idea. We've been badly burned with Moyes to double down on the risk of making a similar mistake with Giggs. We should hire a qualified winner who has managed and won trophies at a decent sized club.
 
No, you're right, it does wind me up a bit when posters make Giggs out to be some clueless chancer, usually as if they know it as fact. But it's redcafe, I'm used to it...

To be fair, it's just as bad as people who are insisting that Giggs is going to be a success when there's absolutely nothing to prove he's likely to be. But I guess it's a thread where people are going to disagree heavily.
 
The problem with talking about the board appointing him based on logic is that this is the board who viewed David Moyes as the logical successor to Fergie, which was an appalling decision.

I don't doubt that we're preparing him to be manager at some stage, but that's only good if he's going to be a good manager, which is rather gigantic if. Should it turn out he's not particularly suited to the job, the experience he'll have gained won't really help him, in the same way we could've had Moyes as assistant manager for decades and he'd have probably still been a bit shite in the end.

I agree and that was my point at the start when I questioned Devil may care.....we don't know what Giggs' qualities are really which may make him a good choice for manager - it is a massive if for fans as we haven't a clue and that was why i asked Devil may care why he was so sure.....

If he is selected I'd like to think that the board have not taken the decision lightly and I think that especially after the Moyes experience which cost the Glazers a CL place and ££££££££ they will make sure they make the best choice as they perceive it.....

I'm not sure myself but I'm definitely glass half full on Giggs - I'm not going to write him off on heresay and the fact he hasn't gotten Everton to a stready 6th/7th position after several yoyo seasons and a very brief flirtation with the CL....

Gary Monk anyone?
 
To be fair, it's just as bad as people who are insisting that Giggs is going to be a success when there's absolutely nothing to prove he's likely to be. But I guess it's a thread where people are going to disagree heavily.
Nobody is saying that tho, that would be stupid... They just like the idea and want to give him a chance. If he got the job it would be because smarter people than us okay'd it....
 
so you are saying we shouldn't do what Barca did with Pep himself and give Giggs a chance - prior to taking the job Pep had only looked after the Barca B team and got some experience that way. He had of course worked under a number of top managers and they decided to take a chance which proved successful. Why wouldn't we do that with Giggs....I'd say giving Pep the chance was something in the pipeline for a while and not just a romantic gesture on their part.

If Giggs is being primed to be the successor to Van Gaal and that is something that has been discussed openly then its because they respect his ability, they understand his qualities and they see him as a strong candidate to be successful as manager...it's ridiculous to suggest the board would simply consider him because of his past standing at the club - this has been a long term decision and he has been readied for it

there are areas where Giggs is untested.....being in charge when shit happens for example but, as Mourinho shows now, there are no guarantees.... in any appointment there is an element of risk - I think Giggs is certainly worth it based on the fact that he has been prepared as a long term option for manager since Fergie retired and perhaps earlier than that based on what the great man said himself

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/manchester-united-legend-sir-alex-6579228

No we shouldn't do it because Pep worked out at Barca, as I said he was a an exception to the rule, a unique talent in regards to his lifelong obsession with tactics and the intricacies of football, and as I mentioned he was inheriting a team in a league where if you are manager of Barca or Real it's practically impossible to finish outside the top 3 these days and in the side he had 3 of the absolute best players in the world. Giggs would have none of these benefits and we compete in a league where there are arguably 7 (at least 6) teams contesting 4 CL spots, it would be a disaster and stupid when there are actually proper proven managers to choose from.
 
It'd never undo his legendary status as a player: that's cemented in for life. What it would potentially do if he fails is mean that should he then succeed later in his managerial career, when he's got more experience, he'd probably never get another crack at it.
Not neccesarily. Graeme Souness is a Liverpool legend, an ex-Liverpool captain and a player who was a part of their best ever team. While not exactly a Giggs, he still played 350 games for them. Almost every Liverpool fan seems to hate him.
 
I think there's just too much at stake to even entertain the idea. We've been badly burned with an Moyes to double down on the risk of making a similar mistake with Giggs. We should hire a qualified winner who has managed and won trophies at a decent sized club.

maybe....personally if I was on the board and Pep was available I'd go for him myself

I think if they have decided on Giggs he has had plenty of time to prepare and he will be ready - I see no reason why he couldn't be a success....
 
Nobody is saying that tho, that would be stupid... They just like the idea and want to give him a chance. If he got the job it would be because smarter people than us okay'd it....

This isn't a good reason, though. Boards make mistakes all the time. They constantly make poor managerial appointments. Ours felt that David Moyes was a good appointment a couple of years back, yet it turned out to be a dreadful one. I don't doubt they're an intelligent group of people and that they'll deliberate heavily before make an appointment, but they've already shown us that they have a capacity to get these things terribly wrong.
 
Nobody is saying that tho, that would be stupid... They just like the idea and want to give him a chance. If he got the job it would be because smarter people than us okay'd it....
Yeah, the same smart arses that employed Moyes.
 
Because I am most impressed with how Giggs successfully adapt his game when he get into different ages, and against all odds, and how well he took care of himself over his long successful career at the top. That's the traits to become a good manager in my book. Plus he always sounds intelligent to me, someone who understand the game well and everyone look up to him.

Honestly, I really don't know if there are any traits in the life of a footballer that really tell you how he'll do once you try management. You just never know. Also, knowing, understanding football and implementing these things are two different things.

As for everyone looking up to you, it's only good for about five minutes until you start asking the players to do silly things.
 
I really really hope we appoint Giggs at the end of next season and stick with him through thick and thin. Give him a real go at it. No doubt we'll have to put up with all the whinging about Klopp 'transforming' Liverpool and Pep 'elevating' City. But I want Giggs, I want us to maintain our identity and our board to genuinely stand by our new manager.
 
I think there's just too much at stake to even entertain the idea. We've been badly burned with an Moyes to double down on the risk of making a similar mistake with Giggs. We should hire a qualified winner who has managed and won trophies at a decent sized club.

I don't really see how anyone could disagree with this. We're not the club to let someone have their first crack at, and I don't care that a few notable exceptions to this rule like Pep have done excellently.

Look at the playing cast he had, and how much competition they have over there!
 
No we shouldn't do it because Pep worked out at Barca, as I said he was a an exception to the rule, a unique talent in regards to his lifelong obsession with tactics and the intricacies of football, and as I mentioned he was inheriting a team in a league where if you are manager of Barca or Real it's practically impossible to finish outside the top 3 these days and in the side he had 3 of the absolute best players in the world. Giggs would have none of these benefits and we compete in a league where there are arguably 7 (at least 6) teams contesting 4 CL spots, it would be a disaster and stupid when there are actually proper proven managers to choose from.

wash your mouth out and say 5 Hail Martials, 6 Our Luke Shaws and a glory be to the De Gea

take your point about the comparative lack of competitivity in the Spanish League though - if you are second there though you are a failure tho?
 
Yeah, the same smart arses that employed Moyes.
You better get another green and gold campaign going then because these are the guys who are going to be picking the next manager...
This isn't a good reason, though. Boards make mistakes all the time. They constantly make poor managerial appointments. Ours felt that David Moyes was a good appointment a couple of years back, yet it turned out to be a dreadful one. I don't doubt they're an intelligent group of people and that they'll deliberate heavily before make an appointment, but they've already shown us that they have a capacity to get these things terribly wrong.
Did they get it wrong with LVG?
 
I think there's just too much at stake to even entertain the idea. We've been badly burned with Moyes to double down on the risk of making a similar mistake with Giggs. We should hire a qualified winner who has managed and won trophies at a decent sized club.

Exactly, we are not in a climate right now to be taking such a huge risk, there's no way anyone can argue it wouldn't be a crazy gamble no matter how long Giggs has been around the club. If you take these risks with a Barca or Bayern then chances are you can still finish in the top 4 and give the manager time to bed in, but the PL is a different beast and all of our main rivals will have proven experienced managers at the helm, it would be suicidal while the team itself is still so young and in need of proper guidance from a seasoned hand.
 
I really really hope we appoint Giggs at the end of next season and stick with him through thick and thin. Give him a real go at it. No doubt we'll have to put up with all the whinging about Klopp 'transforming' Liverpool and Pep 'elevating' City. But I want Giggs, I want us to maintain our identity and our board to genuinely stand by our new manager.


What is our identity? Bringing through young local lads? The world has changed, local lads are becoming fewer at fewer at all the top clubs.

I'd say the only way Giggs would get it is through his work closely shadowing Van Gaal's methods. Not just doing it the old United way, which is nothing like what Van Gaal's doing, in either style of play or recruitment.
 
I really really hope we appoint Giggs at the end of next season and stick with him through thick and thin. Give him a real go at it. No doubt we'll have to put up with all the whinging about Klopp 'transforming' Liverpool and Pep 'elevating' City. But I want Giggs, I want us to maintain our identity and our board to genuinely stand by our new manager.

That's all well and good, but what if we finish 8th in our first season? How long do we stick with him until we get rid of him? If a manager does terribly, you sack him. He shouldn't just get a free ride for...well, I've got absolutely no idea why that would happen if he didn't do well.
 
No we shouldn't do it because Pep worked out at Barca, as I said he was a an exception to the rule, a unique talent in regards to his lifelong obsession with tactics and the intricacies of football, and as I mentioned he was inheriting a team in a league where if you are manager of Barca or Real it's practically impossible to finish outside the top 3 these days and in the side he had 3 of the absolute best players in the world. Giggs would have none of these benefits and we compete in a league where there are arguably 7 (at least 6) teams contesting 4 CL spots, it would be a disaster and stupid when there are actually proper proven managers to choose from.
Something that gets repeatedly ignored. He was spending time in coaching even when he was a player, and then not only travelled the Europe but also went in S.America to study some extreme tactics in football. His biggest influence was Marcelo Bielsa (who is even more extreme than Van Gaal) with whom he spent countless hours discussing tactics.

When he went to Barca he had a vision and a plan how to achieve it. His first move was replacing Ronaldinho and Deco, their best players in Riijkard era and two fan favorites.

I just don't see it in Giggs. His talking looks as motivating as watching Teletubbies. The closest we have seen him at tactics, was saying 'Wilson is quick' near that whiteboard.

And then there is obviously that we'll be far more patient with him than we should be. Simple as that, if Giggsy was our manager in 13-14, he wouldn't have been sacked like Moyes was.

I also think that the argument that the board knows better than us doesn't work at all considering that the board made an absolutely terrible appointment, that even after 18 months and 250m spent, we have yet to fully fix it. It is the same board after all.

Anyway, hopefully it is Ed's decision and with it, it is his career at stake. I have zero faith on our football people making a non-mental decision. Fergie - and the rest - were advocating for Giggsy getting the job when Moyes was sacked. Lunacity if I ever saw one.
 
What is our identity? Bringing through young local lads? The world has changed, local lads are becoming fewer at fewer at all the top clubs.

I'd say the only way Giggs would get it is through his work closely shadowing Van Gaal's methods. Not just doing it the old United way, which is nothing like what Van Gaal's doing, in either style of play or recruitment.

I don't know where to start in response to this. Bottom line is want us to recruit from within, I wanted that when Fergie left but the candidate wasn't there. I'm hoping Giggs will be that candidate next time.
 
wash your mouth out and say 5 Hail Martials, 6 Our Luke Shaws and a glory be to the De Gea

take your point about the comparative lack of competitivity in the Spanish League though - if you are second there though you are a failure tho?

Lol, I am a fan of all 3 players but only De Gea is world class and he may not be here when the next manager comes in.

I'm not sure that mentality is quite as strong at Barca as with Real, but the point was more that I think if the PL was weaker we'd be content to give 2 or 3 seasons of finishing 4th while he bedded in, but with the PL we don't have that luxury, as Arsenal and Liverpool have shown the fall from being a genuine title challenger can set in to becoming the norm.
 
maybe....personally if I was on the board and Pep was available I'd go for him myself

I think if they have decided on Giggs he has had plenty of time to prepare and he will be ready - I see no reason why he couldn't be a success....
But how can he be ready if he hasn't put into practice what he's learnt? Surely the logical thing would be to see him put what he's learnt into practice before we even consider something like this?

Look, I can study something and probably pass it on the theoretical level, but that doesn't mean I will necessarily be able to execute what I've learnt at the highest level. I just think for his own good, he needs to get experience elsewhere. You cannot put him in charge of the team of a multi-billion pound corporation without even first seeing what he can do at a lower level just because he learnt from two or three managers. Imo he must show what he's learnt first before being even considered for such a position.
 
Do you think Giggs has the "balls" to make tough decisions? tbh I don't know but I sure would not want to risk our future with him...though I may have been desperate enough to think of him before.

Not sure either. As I said before, 10-15 years ago, I'd have been all for it but I reckon it's a huge step up from assistant to managing one of Europe's biggest clubs without having tried it elsewhere.
 
That's all well and good, but what if we finish 8th in our first season? How long do we stick with him until we get rid of him? If a manager does terribly, you sack him. He shouldn't just get a free ride for...well, I've got absolutely no idea why that would happen if he didn't do well.

We should stick with him yes, even with an 8th place finish. Provided there is a plan and signs of progress. I know most on here won't agree with me but I want Giggs.
 
Something just doesn't feel right about giving Giggs the job when Van Gaal moves on. The best managers have that aura/fear factor/personality at the very top....I'm not convinced yet Giggs has those qualities but for sure he could prove me wrong..I'd prefer to see him get experience at a mid table club first. But if there are no Klopp's, Simeone's or Guardiola's out there available when Van Gaal calls time in a year and a half then I'd happily see Giggs given a chance. I'd probably have Pochettino or Martinez ahead of Giggs to be honest still at this point even though neither of them get the excitment levels up that much. We all assumed Keane would be great and he has done nothing in the game as a manager yet so with Giggs it's a risk
 
I don't know where to start in response to this. Bottom line is want us to recruit from within, I wanted that when Fergie left but the candidate wasn't there. I'm hoping Giggs will be that candidate next time.

Why? Should we have not appointed Fergie as our manager due to this?
 
maybe....personally if I was on the board and Pep was available I'd go for him myself

I think if they have decided on Giggs he has had plenty of time to prepare and he will be ready - I see no reason why he couldn't be a success....

The reasons are quite obvious - he's never managed before and is being selected because he was a good player and "loyal servant", both of which are epically irrelevant to selecting a manager.
 
Did they get it wrong with LVG?

To be fair, he was almost a default choice. The only high-calibre manager whi was available.

Anyway, Moyes was picked by SAF and LVG was picked by Ed (or at least, they were the ideators and pushed that).
 
We should stick with him yes, even with an 8th place finish. Provided there is a plan and signs of progress. I know most on here won't agree with me but I want Giggs.

I really don't get that at all. You'd happily see us turned into a mid-table club, just so a legendary player can be our manager? I'd imagine that if we continued to struggle and didn't do well under him, there'd be no signs of progress, and any plan would probably be terrible. How many years of mediocrity would you be okay with under Giggs, out of interest?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.