Is that Willington?
I'd argue you need a full profile on Mascheroni and Ortiz, people should be familiar with Maspoli.
Checking your squad, most of them should be straightforward so no need to go into more detail.
In other drafts you may find it's still a good thing to have a few words on each player be it in the form of short profiles or as part of your OP. I often revert to those, particularly when a player may have many incarnations (which one are you playing and which skills and attributes they bring to the table, etc.). Otherwise you end up having to regurgitate much of it anyway answering questions so it's best to get it out of the way and focus discussions on what you want to discuss rather than answering peripheral enquiries.
Unless of course you don't want to be clear and would rather have all incarnations playing at the same time, which managers typically do with the likes of Paul Scholes or Bernd Schuster. I find it annoying, but the average voter seems to assume the one on the pitch is the one they like best, i.e. the combination of attributes which would work best, even if said player never displayed them at the same stage of their career.
Look at that grin, man! Looks like a Republican Senator running for office. "Hey, I'm a decent - and feckin' cheerful - guy, really!"
