MattofManchester
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2018
- Messages
- 3,986
One down, one to go.
I can see a Tsitsipas win going in. Fresher, better form as of QF.
I can see a Tsitsipas win going in. Fresher, better form as of QF.
Sorry to bring it back to Djokovic again but the BBC are now running the story which casts doubt on his positive test. I think it was brought up a while back in this thread.
If this comes out as true it’s really a very bad look for him. Probably criminal as well.
https://www.bbc.com/news/59999541?piano-modal
Doubts have emerged over the timing of the positive Covid test Novak Djokovic used to enter Australia to try to compete in the Australian Open.
It was provided to exempt him from rules barring unvaccinated people.
However, the serial number on his test on 16 December appears out of sequence with a sample of tests from Serbia over this period gathered by the BBC.
It is also higher than for his second (negative) test result from six days later.
He'd probably come out better than knowingly interacting with children while having Covid-19.If this comes out as true it’s really a very bad look for him. Probably criminal as well.
This is stuff a lot of people had questioned some weeks ago but good to see the BBC has gone and checked out multiple samples. I think everyone knows he faked it but if it can ever be proven, he'll be in trouble.Sorry to bring it back to Djokovic again but the BBC are now running the story which casts doubt on his positive test. I think it was brought up a while back in this thread.
If this comes out as true it’s really a very bad look for him. Probably criminal as well.
https://www.bbc.com/news/59999541?piano-modal
Doubts have emerged over the timing of the positive Covid test Novak Djokovic used to enter Australia to try to compete in the Australian Open.
It was provided to exempt him from rules barring unvaccinated people.
However, the serial number on his test on 16 December appears out of sequence with a sample of tests from Serbia over this period gathered by the BBC.
It is also higher than for his second (negative) test result from six days later.
He'd probably come out better than knowingly interacting with children while having Covid-19.
As for the criminal aspect, he's like God in Serbia so they won't touch him.
Tsitsipas, me thinks. As he can target the backhand. On the other hand, Nadal is a competent net player and Medvedev seems to have a weakness against that sort of game. Similar to how he played him in the US Open win towards the end.So who do we think Nadal would rather face out of these two?
I think Tsitsipas, on his day, is the far more dangerous player but he is also the one who is more likely to implode and show nerves in a final. Medvedev doesn't have the tools to cause damage that Tsitsipas does but his base level and consistency is a lot higher than the former's and is less likely to display nerves. So, I don't think I care who makes it. Both will be difficult.So who do we think Nadal would rather face out of these two?
I agree, Medvedev is also a much better returner than Tsitsipas and if Nadal serves well Tsitsipas may struggle.I think Tsitsipas, on his day, is the far more dangerous player but he is also the one who is more likely to implode and show nerves in a final. Medvedev doesn't have the tools to cause damage that Tsitsipas does but his base level and consistency is a lot higher than the former's and is less likely to display nerves. So, I don't think I care who makes it. Both will be difficult.
I think that's a bit harsh on Tsitsipas, he's proved to be a very good player on both clay and hard courts over the past few years and he's still young. To me his return of serve is an obvious weakness but he has a pretty well rounded game in my opinion. I'll give you Stan, Murray and Del Potro for the time being but you have to recognise that he's only 23 and he's made a RG final, a few AO SFs, won the ATP finals and has a Masters 1000 title.Medvedev-Nadal final would be a more interesting watch.
To be honest, I can't help but feel Tsitsipas is one of those who is where he is in the men's game largely due to the relative lack of quality compared to the last 10 years or so. Berrettini the same.
If he was competing alongside fit/prime Wawrinka/Murray/Tsonga/Del Potro/Ferrer/etc, I think you'd rarely see him in the second week of slams.
If it’s proven he faked it surely that’s a crime in Australia using falsified information to gain entry and he won’t be getting back in to the country in future?
Nadal was pretty good as he often is early on in games and Berrettini struggled with his backhand, as expected. The third set, Nadal missed a very easy volley at 2-2 30-30 which would have given him BP. After that, he lost the next 20 points on Berretini's serve. Recovered by the 4th though as you saw.I've only caught moments of this match but it seems to be pretty high quality.
I was sleeping during Nadal's opening two sets against Berrettini but was he playing at a high level as in this match or was Berrettini not very good?
I think that's a bit harsh on Tsitsipas, he's proved to be a very good player on both clay and hard courts over the past few years and he's still young. To me his return of serve is an obvious weakness but he has a pretty well rounded game in my opinion. I'll give you Stan, Murray and Del Potro for the time being but you have to recognise that he's only 23 and he's made a RG final, a few AO SFs, won the ATP finals and has a Masters 1000 title.
I don't mind Tsitsipas, even if he is a bit odd but his dad is like this all the time unfortunately.What is overwhelmingly his fault is how unlikable him and his team/box are, which looks like it could be proving an issue again today.
He was the favourite prior to the tournament in my eyes (less so before Novak was deported) and still the favourite in the final I think.
Medvedev is rightly favorite but Nadal has exceeded expectations so hoping for a good game. If Nadal had beaten the likes of Zverev on the way to the final, I'd have backed him to win. I still think he has a good chance but he's going to need step up his game and kick out all the errors and lapses of concentration he's prone to right now.Final played with roof closed, the heavier condition should favor Nadal. I think this is dead even honestly.
Medvedev is rightly favorite but Nadal has exceeded expectations so hoping for a good game. If Nadal had beaten the likes of Zverev on the way to the final, I'd have backed him to win. I still think he has a good chance but he's going to need step up his game and kick out all the errors and lapses of concentration he's prone to right now.