GlastonSpur
Also disliked on an Aston Villa forum
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2007
- Messages
- 17,716
- Supports
- Spurs
My God let Glaston explain that one..
Press click bait ...as if it wasn't obvious.
My God let Glaston explain that one..
Press click bait ...as if it wasn't obvious.
Like the Pogba and United you mean?
Spurs are not after Icardi. But I think your interest in Pogba is real, despite the absurd monies involved.
How do you know you are not after Icardi though?
Because they have a stadium to build and cannot spend this money on a striker.
But they want Jansen and even had a bid rejected for him, so they clearly want another striker to compete with Kane. Whether they'd be willing to spend near £40m on one is another question, but considering the news involves Icardi who plays in Italy, I would be surprised if Di Marzio got it wrong.Because they have a stadium to build and cannot spend this money on a striker.
But they want Jansen and even had a bid rejected for him, so they clearly want another striker to compete with Kane. Whether they'd be willing to spend near £40m on one is another question, but considering the news involves Icardi who plays in Italy, I would be surprised if Di Marzio got it wrong.
Are Spurs the subject of many clickbait articles?Press click bait ...as if it wasn't obvious.
Sky really need to be more selective on how they use their dramatic breaking intro, a 50 year old striker going on loan from Bournemouth to Brighton is not the time!
My God let Glaston explain that one..
... How many clicks would they expect from Spurs fanbase?
Only about two - i.e. one more than the number of your brain cells.
But they want Jansen and even had a bid rejected for him, so they clearly want another striker to compete with Kane. Whether they'd be willing to spend near £40m on one is another question, but considering the news involves Icardi who plays in Italy, I would be surprised if Di Marzio got it wrong.
Clickbaiting Spurs fans would be like clickbaiting Swansea fans i.e. not worth their time.Only about two - i.e. one more than the number of your brain cells.
No, but Di Marzio has been reporting Spurs interest in Icardi for a while now I believe, so there's likely something in it. The problem with Kane, is that if he's injured or not in form they'll need a replacement and they don't really have a top striker in the squad. And with the new TV money coming in, they'll have the resources.Can you imagine Levy paying £40 mln for a striker when they have Kane?
Clickbaiting Spurs fans would be like clickbaiting Swansea fans i.e. not worth their time.
I'll keep this civil since you can't. Is there a history of Spurs clickbaiting? Did the Wanyama transfer pull in so many eyes that they just have to ride that Spurs wave until it crashes on the rocks?
The Janssen saga has the whole country on edge I suppose. Gotta strike when the iron is hot.
Shoe is on the other foot now.Getting touchy there Glaston.
No, but Di Marzio has been reporting Spurs interest in Icardi for a while now I believe, so there's likely something in it. The problem with Kane, is that if he's injured or not in form they'll need a replacement and they don't really have a top striker in the squad. And with the new TV money coming in, they'll have the resources.
Ouch.. Soldado was a great bargain tooYeah, that Lamela-kid was a real bargain.
Berry Berry Shrew mode of developing talents like AdebayorSon is a bargain too.
Paying Adebayor 100k/week while he's partying in Togo is also bargain too!
I can guarantee that if Rashford was playing in the shite Dutch league you wouldn't be saying this.I'm a United fan, and our fanbase is deluded if they think Janssen < Rashford. We just overate young English players. Not that Rashford isn't good, but Janssen is just lethal. If we had a decent DOF we would buy Janssen for peanuts and loan him off while we have Zlatan for the next year or so. Rashford is more likely to be an option on the RW than a striker. He has no hold up game, and his first touch, technique is just poor for a striker. What do top strikers in the world like Suarez, Higuain, Benzema, Ibrahimovic, Aguero have in common? They all have good hold up games and/or great first touch and ball control. Janssen is miles ahead in both.
Not that Rashford isn't good, but Janssen is just lethal. If we had a decent DOF we would buy Janssen for peanuts and loan him off while we have Zlatan for the next year or so.
Oh so 100m is true but Icardi isn't.I'm sorry Janssen if doesn't get you drooling in the way that spending £100m on Pogba clearly would. But then all that glitters is not gold .... and vice-versa of course.
Anyhow, you carry on with your 'galactico' pursuits and mega-bucks spending - just like the last 3 summers - and Spurs will carry on with developing the approach under Pochettino that's worked rather well so far.
I'm a United fan, and our fanbase is deluded if they think Janssen < Rashford. We just overate young English players. Not that Rashford isn't good, but Janssen is just lethal. If we had a decent DOF we would buy Janssen for peanuts and loan him off while we have Zlatan for the next year or so. Rashford is more likely to be an option on the RW than a striker. He has no hold up game, and his first touch, technique is just poor for a striker. What do top strikers in the world like Suarez, Higuain, Benzema, Ibrahimovic, Aguero have in common? They all have good hold up games and/or great first touch and ball control. Janssen is miles ahead in both.
18 year old without a hold-up game and he's instantly declared he can't be a striker. Dear me this is funny.
Technique and touch are hard to learn and his touch is underdeveloped for his age. To hold up the ball he'd have to give up some of his pace, which would make him more reliant on the close control he lacks. So you can see how anyone who has any deductive reasoning abilities wouldn't be optimistic with his potential as a world class striker. Before you go crazy at my analysis, notice i am not saying he doesn't have potential to be a great player. He has good speed, intelligence, and finishing. Which means he's got great potential as a inside forward like Martial. He just won't be a great striker worthy to start in Mourinho team at a top club like ours.
So that means short of an ancient Zlatan we have no good striker prospect and it would be smart to get a young player with the proper skill set required of a modern striker regardless of how many goals he's scored in what league.
I'm a United fan, and our fanbase is deluded if they think Janssen < Rashford. We just overate young English players. Not that Rashford isn't good, but Janssen is just lethal. If we had a decent DOF we would buy Janssen for peanuts and loan him off while we have Zlatan for the next year or so. Rashford is more likely to be an option on the RW than a striker. He has no hold up game, and his first touch, technique is just poor for a striker. What do top strikers in the world like Suarez, Higuain, Benzema, Ibrahimovic, Aguero have in common? They all have good hold up games and/or great first touch and ball control. Janssen is miles ahead in both.