Scarecrow
Having a week off
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2012
- Messages
- 12,364
Yeah, those are fair points.The original trilogy despite its quality was arguably sort of like this too, and had a ton of problems similar to the current one. Vader wasn't written in as Luke's dad till after ANH. Leia wasn't Luke's sister until the last one. Han was only ever frozen in carbonite in case he didn't do the final film. The original ending changed. The Emperor was never really explained and got killed off after about 10-15 mins of screentime. Boba Fett shows up and gets his arse handed to him so quickly into ROTJ he'd make Phasma look competent by comparison.
It's obviously fair to criticise certain flaws when they do arise but anyone expecting a grand vision is probably going to be disappointed, I reckon.
My biggest problem with Star Wars is the lack of complexity and world building but I suppose the simplicity and unpretentiousness of the original trilogy were what made it so personal and charming.
I keep thinking of the franchise as having the potential of a LOTR-in-space fantasy epic but I suppose it was never meant to be anything more then a simple adventure story and it's my problem for being disappointed.
I liked the premise of the prequels and the story expansion but then they were awfully directed and written. Their failure kind of killed the idea of building a wider world, I think, if there ever was one. It's present in the animations and books etc., of course, but those are much lower-risk mediums.