Dan
☃
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2009
- Messages
- 14,669
Only just under 6 months until the Solo film comes out.
Revenge of the Sith being about as bad as the first two prequels is the hill I choose to die on.
Well, it has just 9 movies, 2 TV shows, a dozen video games, circa 300 novels and a lot of comics. If that is no depth at all, I wonder what could be depth.
It's not literally the only door to the cave, that doesn't make sense. It's a blast door designed to withstand heavy artillery but they're not opening that thing every time someone needs to get in our out. There are trenches as a way in but you don't squeest a plattoon single-file through a door.Nah like I said it was a different part of the film. Ignore the back of the cave Rey part, earlier in the cave the door was slammed shut and then 10 seconds later they all found their way outside to line up in trenches to face the first order, with those antique bombers flying out of doors in the roof. They had to get out somehow. Minor thing, but just amused me at the time.
For me episode 3 was better than this
Don't forget Star Wars Rebels which is a very good show. Much much better than this new trilogy.
I know people who insist Revenge of the Sith is a good film among the shite that is the prequels but I just never buy it. They are all awful and it’s less awful (which means it’s not straight to dvd material).
.
In the opening scene, how do the bombs drop down onto the dreadnought? There's no gravity in space for that to happen. There has to be a gravitational force attracting the bombs to the dreadnought for that to happen.
Revenge of the Sith was actually rated quite highly back then when it was released. It still has decent scores in Rotten Tomatoes (both critics and users) and IMDB. The problem is that with the time passing, for a lot of people (and I bet that they haven't even rewatched it then), it became less Revenge of the Sith and more 'that prequel movie' which by default is anathema. But it is actually a quite good movie and is better than The Last Jedi in almost every possible way. It has a more coherent plot, it is more mature and it has the best lightsaber duels. Also, Lucas actually realized that he is shit at humour so that movie doesn't have much humour.I know people who insist Revenge of the Sith is a good film among the shite that is the prequels but I just never buy it. They are all awful and it’s less awful (which means it’s not straight to dvd material).
These new Disney ones are light years beyond all that even if flawed (and what movie isn’t).
That is one of those 2 TV shows.Don't forget Star Wars Rebels which is a very good show. Much much better than this new trilogy.
Personally I think Anakin’s story in that third film is stupid as hell. Especially killing the children out of seemingly no where. That’s not what Star Wars is about to me - it was never that visceral (if that’s the right term). Even Empire has good moments of levity - rather than the grim film episode 3 is. Frankly it’s just the character plot lines are awful and most of the performances are flat as a result.Revenge of the Sith was actually rated quite highly back then when it was released. It still has decent scores in Rotten Tomatoes (both critics and users) and IMDB. The problem is that with the time passing, for a lot of people (and I bet that they haven't even rewatched it then), it became less Revenge of the Sith and more 'that prequel movie' which by default is anathema. But it is actually a quite good movie and is better than The Last Jedi in almost every possible way. It has a more coherent plot, it is more mature and it has the best lightsaber duels. Also, Lucas actually realized that he is shit at humour so that movie doesn't have much humour.
I've had time to think about this movie and now I'm wondering, what are the First Order and the Rebels actually fighting for? Who is governing the galaxy? Do the First Order bigwigs just roam around in space shooting up the Rebels? Was Snoke the Emperor? Does that make Kylo the new Emperor? What are the stakes in this whole fight? What is Kylo trying to prove?
People knock on the prequels, but those movies, and the Clone Wars animation, actually set the world (universe) up properly and you see how the galaxy was governed, trade alliances etc etc, basic space opera stuff. We never got to see any of this. Instead, they tell us (not show) that the First Order has sort of taken over.
At the moment, all it looks like to me is some kid with the Force is having a tantrum and lashing out at the world and a Force sensitive girl is trying to thwart him.
Personally I think Anakin’s story in that third film is stupid as hell. Especially killing the children out of seemingly no where. That’s not what Star Wars is about to me - it was never that visceral (if that’s the right term). Even Empire has good moments of levity - rather than the grim film episode 3 is. Frankly it’s just the character plot lines are awful and most of the performances are flat as a result.
Only good performance I can remember is Palpatine.
It was done. He killed a bunch of women and children in the second movie and he beheaded an unarmed prisoner in the beginning of the third movie.Anakin's turn should have been done over the course of a trilogy, not over the course of 10 minutes.
It was done. He killed a bunch of women and children in the second movie and he beheaded an unarmed prisoner in the beginning of the third movie.
When he kills the Jedi younglings, he is not Anakin anymore, he is Vader instead.
Not saying that the fall of Darth Vader was done rightly, but it definitely took place during 2 movies, not 10 minutes.
Revenge of the Sith was actually rated quite highly back then when it was released. It still has decent scores in Rotten Tomatoes (both critics and users) and IMDB. The problem is that with the time passing, for a lot of people (and I bet that they haven't even rewatched it then), it became less Revenge of the Sith and more 'that prequel movie' which by default is anathema. But it is actually a quite good movie and is better than The Last Jedi in almost every possible way. It has a more coherent plot, it is more mature and it has the best lightsaber duels. Also, Lucas actually realized that he is shit at humour so that movie doesn't have much humour.
I know people who insist Revenge of the Sith is a good film among the shite that is the prequels but I just never buy it. They are all awful and it’s less awful (which means it’s not straight to dvd material).
These new Disney ones are light years beyond all that even if flawed (and what movie isn’t).
This film wasn't perfect, but as a Star Wars hardcore fan I came out of the cinema smiling and really enjoyed it tbh. Sure there were a few moments that were a bit silly, but when it was good it was great. I actually really enjoyed what they did with Luke in this film. When you look at the actions of every Jedi in every movie (including Prequels (sigh)) they all make mistakes and do stupid things with good intentions. Yoda told Luke he had to kill Vader without even letting Luke know he was his father, that is pretty fecked up no? If Yoda had his way Luke would have killed Vader and would have never known he'd just killed his Dad. Obi Wan was arrogant and thought he could train Anakin despite being a young Jedi, he failed, he also didn't tell Luke about Vader. Luke however in the Originals was a perfect character, sure he made mistakes like facing Vader in ESB but it was done with good intentions, he never made a decision that was controversial. What we saw from Luke in this film was he is just as flawed. He feared Ben and we all know what Yoda used to say “Fear is the path to the dark side. Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering.” That's precisely what happened with Luke, he feared Ben which led him to a brief taste of the Dark Side (but stopped himself) but that action caused Ben to embrace anger and the rest is history.
I proper belly laughed at the Rey parentage reveal and gave an even bigger laugh when they killed Snoke. I've been listening to a Star Wars podcast for the last two years and I had this picture in my heads of their poor saddened faces at the realisation that they'd had the rug pulled out from under them. They were even discussing the idea that some characters in the recent Battlefront game could be Reys parents. I mean seriously...
What both me and my sister discussed for the hour long drive back yesterday at midnight was the direction the films could go for Ep9. It's really difficult to work out what will happen given the lack of clues, all we know is that there's going to be an internal power struggle in the First Order as General Hux and Kylo Ren have been enemies for a while. Then we've got potential hint that Ep9 could be set several years in the future and be focused around the next generation of Rebels. The whole idea of Ep8 was the passing of the torch to the new Generation, so i'd be surprised if we had a definitive ending like we had in ROTJ. Strikes me as Ep9 will reinforce the message of Ep8 and leave us with a rebuilt Rebel Alliance taking on Kylo Ren who's developed into the next Sith Lord.
Meh, it wasn't the focus it didn't feel like. He literally tried to arrest Palpatine still a good Jedi, stormed out, came back and turned to the dark side in about 10 minutes.
I'm with Kevin Smith on the ending, they really should have had Luke actually there and feck shit up, just given the character that big finale. Like Vader in Rogue One just cemented his status even more.
Even the most angriest man-child nerd would have surely had this down as the greatest film ever on that one scene alone. I mean it was a pleasant send off, but what was the actual point? Kids and nerds alike would have loved it too. So easy to write, changes nothing whatsoever about the story and the next film, yet would have just made everyone happy.
Other than that, after a second viewing and on reflection, my thoughts haven't changed much. Decent enough, a few miss-steps imo, a bit too long, but still way better than any of those shite prequels. Oh and it really is amazingly good looking.
Oh no, Trade alliances! Flash backs there.
Agree in general though, if there is currency, and independent arms dealers etc, who is in charge of it all if not the first order?
I must be the only one who enjoyed seeing that side of things.
I suppose my main gripe is there wasn't much world building. We still don't know who Snoke is! I'm betting Disney is saving all these little bits for books and games though.
Vader in Rogue One felt a little like pandering.
I think Luke’s ending is more powerful than if he’d just said ‘eh, I was wrong about all that Jedi stuff being a mistake.’ As it was he showed himself to be even more powerful and able to rise above the contradictions he’d found in the Jedi.
I know this is perhaps a little too much weight to give to the intentions of a popular blockbuster but for the sake of my childhood self I’m running with it.
We all know how this end.
It'll be return of the jedi once again with a glimpse of a new hope, for another trilogy of money making star wars.
But... Fwiw, its still a great saga
Vader in Rogue One felt a little like pandering.
I think Luke’s ending is more powerful than if he’d just said ‘eh, I was wrong about all that Jedi stuff being a mistake.’ As it was he showed himself to be even more powerful and able to rise above the contradictions he’d found in the Jedi.
I know this is perhaps a little too much weight to give to the intentions of a popular blockbuster but for the sake of my childhood self I’m running with it.
Killing Snoke off means this won't go the way of ROTJ.
Agree, it was a fanboy's wet dream and exactly the sort of story beat this film wisely avoided.
Also, while ROTS was by far the best of prequel films, in filmaking terms it was inferior to TLJ in pretty much every way bar appeasing those same Star Wars nerds.
Rotj is about luke and vader, the emperor is just a backdrop.
But 2 movies in i dont see how they can come up with anything major other than rey confronting Kylo in the climax.
Infact id tend to lean on the disney more simple ending, good vs bad kinda stuff. There's only 1 movie left and there isn't much time to develop another twist, or another major antagonist.
Why though? Why is it wise? Absolutely nothing would have changed, but it would have just been a kick ass scene that kids, bored parents and fans could all get behind. Why not just go all out and please everyone at once?
I agree in general with the anti-pandering stuff, but I think even that can go too far the other way and doing things different for the sake of it. Like here, where literally nothing would have been different to give Luke that all powerful ending.
Having him suddenly emerge from isolation as a ridiculously overpowered badass who can singlehandedly defeat entire armies (only to presumably then lose a lightsaber fight with emo vader) would have been an extension of the fanboy-imagined Luke rather than the Luke this film actually set up, I think. I'm sure it would have been a crowdpleasing moment but it would have been less in keeping with the overall film.
But why would it? The argument is it's a kids film, or they are doing something different, but why could they not have at least had his force projection still do cool stuff in that case?