Class of 63
Sourness
A positive thread eh, how is one to respond, sod it embrace I say -
Great OP by the way
Great OP by the way
We've gone backwards. Why do I say this? Because results are worse than they were 2 years ago. You'll argue that results don't matter. I would argue that results are everything and that winning is the most important thing in all pro sports.
Spot on. Great post.The only "nonsense" trotted out on this forum is this rhetoric right here.
Romanticism has everything to do with it, it's why the club hired him in the first place and it's why people here continue to want him to be given about 3 seasons and 6 transfer windows to do whatever he wants to do.
That "shiny trophyless Poch" that everyone worships as you say has accomplished more than Ole has in his entire managerial career, and yet he hasn't won anything, so what does that tell you? "Poch hasn't won anything he was sacked!" They'll tell you as reasons why he shouldn't be manager and yet in the same breath they'll say "You can't judge Ole on getting Cardiff relegated!" As a form of defence it's damn hypocritical for starters. It tells you that the only reason he is anywhere near this club is because he used to play for us, and is a club legend as a player, do you honestly think the club would have approached him otherwise? No, they would not have.
Was everyone clamouring for David Moyes? Well guess what, even he has better credentials than Ole for the job and a better record for us at one point, yet everyone's like no no, time, time, give time, despite the fact it's so obvious how one dimensional and lacklustre we are. So why? The club certainly didn't hire him for his credentials, and the fans certainly aren't crying out to give him time etc because of the scintillating football we play, so please tell me why it is people continue to want him managing us when there are better prospects out there?
I'll answer that for you, it's because of the "romanticism", it's the idea that as a club we are above everyone else and every manager deserves time regardless blah blah blah. Barcelona just sacked their manager despite how they've been doing the past few seasons.. why? Because they are run like an actual football club and they went out and got a man they thought better suited to the job.
This club could have Guardiola, Klopp and Prime Fergie as free agents right now to pick from and they'd still keep going with Solksjaer because they are reactionary and useless.
This is why the club is in such a mediocre state, everybody wants to give time, oh he's had 12 months and he's doing ok? Please enlighten everyone as to how good we are as a football team on the pitch? "B-b-but he needs like 10 players!" I'll admit the team is young but you can still imprint a modern style of actual good football but we don't even get that.
Nobody who wants "Ole out" is crying because they want the Fergie dominance back immediately, they're "crying" because they want to get away from it and get a modern manager with modern ideas in and not waste time on a manager who won't take us anywhere significant, and as much as I love the man, I don't think he will, this isn't me "hating" on him, it's me not burying my head in the sand and hoping he comes good in 4/5/6 years, when, as this thread states, we have a good talented bunch of young players coming through. Good, so let's get them the coaching they deserve then.
Exactly. Yet Ole-In posters are accused of being thick and romanticising by trying to think outside of the box and for being able to see the clear difference in direction we are headed under Ole compared to the last three ‘experienced managers.’So by your own logic, you would have fired Fergie in 1989? After all we had just finished 11th in the league, he had been there three years, and by December were near the relegation zone. For you, the progress he had made was worth nothing? He should have been sacked?
If not, then you're not actually talking from principle. You're just making stuff up to justify your negativity.
Talent in the managerial department, possibly. The chasm isn't becuase of "previous managers". It's because of all post SAF managers. All Ole has really done is make a couple of signings that may turn out to be good ones, and sell a few other players. The actual football has been bang average and his record shows it. Forget the record the quality of football shows it too. And it's a bit disingenous to call managers who achieved more than Ole wrong managers while calling him the one to put us 'on the wrong track' given said situation.Our problem is very much talent. Money does not always buy the right talent as seen in the past 6 years. For sure, the talent chasm between us and the top 2 is because of the previous managers and the front office. Ole has put us on the right track as the OP has said and he deserves credit. Tactics are help so far if you don't have the squad to implement correctly.
So by your own logic, you would have fired Fergie in 1989? After all we had just finished 11th in the league, he had been there three years, and by December were near the relegation zone. For you, the progress he had made was worth nothing? He should have been sacked?
If not, then you're not actually talking from principle. You're just making stuff up to justify your negativity.
Talent in the managerial department, possibly. The chasm isn't becuase of "previous managers". It's because of all post SAF managers. All Ole has really done is make a couple of signings that may turn out to be good ones, and sell a few other players. The actual football has been bang average and his record shows it. Forget the record the quality of football shows it too. And it's a bit disingenous to call managers who achieved more than Ole wrong managers while calling him the one to put us 'on the wrong track' given said situation.
And for where it went wrong for us, it's obviously many things. But failing to become a cohesive and fluid modern football side that is tactically with these times is a big part of it. That's one thing that Ole hasn't addressed
We should assume any average manager who had a crap first season at any club shouldn't be evaluated till he gets at least 5 years as he might transform into Fergie MK2 after 5 years because one manager in the history of football managed it
Ole has enough talented players to play quality football, or at least show true progress and real managerial talent. It's a myth that we don't have good players, we have many of them and he's already had 150 million to spend. Mourinho also had good players and while I'll never say that he did a good job as he did not, barring his third year he generally did a much better job than Ole, especially considering the trophy and 2nd place finish. The biggest difference between the two is that people expected excellence from Mourinho which he did not deliver, whereas nobody expects anything from Ole and anything he does - a couple of wins, a signing or two who aren't terrible - are considered achievements and signs of genuine progress.I hope you don't think Mourinho built a cohesive and fluid modern football side when he was here. Because he did not. I think he didn't because he is on the downside of his career, he is just not as good as he used to be, and because he did not have enough talented players. Ole also does not have enough talented players but he is building one especially if he gets Bruno.
I didn't say anything like that - you're just making stuff up.
I understand you're not super-rational about your Ole-out obsession, but having an actual argument to make might help your case.
Actually anyone pointing to time afforded to a manager 25 years back as any sort of basis for argument probably doesn't have a proper one.I didn't say anything like that - you're just making stuff up.
I understand you're not super-rational about your Ole-out obsession, but having an actual argument to make might help your case.
Ole has enough talented players to play quality football, or at least show true progress and real managerial talent. It's a myth that we don't have good players, we have many of them and he's already had 150 million to spend. Mourinho also had good players and while I'll never say that he did a good job as he did not, barring his third year he generally did a much better job than Ole, especially considering the trophy and 2nd place finish. The biggest difference between the two is that people expected excellence from Mourinho which he did not deliver, whereas nobody expects anything from Ole and anything he does - a couple of wins, a signing or two who aren't terrible - are considered achievements and signs of genuine progress.
Actually anyone pointing to time afforded to a manager 25 years back as any sort of basis for argument probably doesn't have a proper one.
Maybe stopping mentioning Ferguson example in every single Ole discussion might be a good first step to make it any kind of meaningful argument. No way to discuss his position when it will always fall to "Ferguson's results were poor in his first 5 years so what" when the other side runs out of replays. An example that can be used as an excuse for any underperforming manager in any club in the world. With this example any crap manager at any club can say he's building something special that will be obvious several years from now on with just more time, just look at Ferguson.
Actually anyone pointing to time afforded to a manager 25 years back as any sort of basis for argument probably doesn't have a proper one.
More like, being a simpleton. Well done on that I suppose.Well, I used Fergie as my example because this is a Man Utd forum and I was trying to keep things simple.
Not simple enough for you to understand, clearly.
Some positives there for sure but sadly under our current ownership we still won't get anywhere.
Also really don't agree with Maguire and Lindelof part. The former is just about good enough for a top four club and the latter isn't good enough at this level.
You can't have something special at United, and expect that to lead to anything tangible unless you have an excellent manager. So yeah the most important footballing figure at the club plays a huge role on this special thing we are apparently moving towards.opening line of the OP is this is not about Ole. I totally get peoples frustration and others support, but there are other threads for this
If you bothered to read the thread you would know I was responding to a specific point about results being the only important factor, and that perceived progress is irrelevant. Nothing in the fact that Fergie had made obvious progress at the time can be used "as an excuse for any underperforming manager in any club in the world."
Again, you're not making an argument. You're just bitching and moaning because someone says something you don't like.
You've made six or eight posts in this thread. Can you point to a single one in which you have added any value or insight?
More like, being a simpleton. Well done on that I suppose.
As for my posts in this thread I'm fine with them. For me most of Ole's discussions have become extremely boring because of the never ending and repetitive excuses. I have had enough of them, I only engage in them when I see silly replays, like yours. The ignore button is always present for those who don't like posts of others. I myself use it a lot.
So you're bored with the Ole discussions and your response is just to spam those having an actual discussion with your negativity and insults?
How lovely of you. No wonder your reputation in the forum is what it is.
And what, maybe you are missing it but you weren't the one talking with the original poster from the start. He was talking with someone else and you decided to jump the train with your terrible and overused example as if you have brought something new to the table that no one else has ever said here.
My level of discourse is tailor made for the participants. I mean, "not simple enough for you" was supposed to be a compliment now was it?Really? That's the level of your discourse? What's wrong with you? I mean, I imagine that you are a teenager, but you can do better than just throw insults, surely?
I clearly said I only engage in them when I see silly replays like yours. And what, maybe you are missing it but you weren't the one talking with the original poster from the start. He was talking with someone else and you decided to jump the train with your terrible and overused example as if you have brought something new to the table that no one else has ever said here.
As for these reputations stuff, this is a football forum where people who don't know each other beyond it post their opinions on the club, anything more than that is irrelevant.
True. I remember people questioningly the purpose of the youth system sometime back becuase we hadn't seen a 'top player' for ages. I think it's great. Nothing like developing and promoting young footballers, and turning them into stars. And we're doing some strong work in that regard. Lots of talent once again in the youth teams /among the youth products. Lovely to see.What gives me hope and optimism for the future is the work done by Nicky Butt and the rest of the personnel at academy level which will give us a solid foundation in the coming years. The two fullbacks Laird and Williams, Mason, Hannibal Mejbri, Garner, Levitt etc, will at the very least become first team squad players imo. Noam Emeran who we beat of competition from some very big clubs is still yet to feature.
Mejbri and Laird in particular i'm very hopeful of being first team regulars in the future.
Anyhoo the Sir Alex comparison has been trotted out a million times. And it's a weak one. Times have changed and we have to move on with them. We cannot afford to give every average manager 5 years because of that one time we struck gold.
For someone bored with Ole discussions you deserve enormous credit for persisting with them day in, day out, in basically every thread that has any remote connection to Ole's role at the club. Credit is also warranted for how you selflessly redirect every single discussion towards Ole despite the fact it bores you so much.
If not you, who else can we depend on to immediately shit on anything remotely positive in our current situation? Even @Alabaster Codify7 manages to offer balance and the occasional bit of positivity when Ole gets a result, but I'll forgive him those minor indiscretions.
And let's not forget how you save us all so much time by labelling anyone on the other side of the discussion as 'delusional' instead of wasting time having an actual debate about it. The repetitive, meaningless arguments you create in EVERY feckING THREAD in the United forum are so much more rewarding for the rest of us who inhabit the place.
What gives me hope and optimism for the future is the work done by Nicky Butt and the rest of the personnel at academy level which will give us a solid foundation in the coming years. The two fullbacks Laird and Williams, Mason, Hannibal Mejbri, Garner, Levitt etc, will at the very least become first team squad players imo. Noam Emeran who we beat of competition from some very big clubs is still yet to feature.
Mejbri and Laird in particular i'm very hopeful of being first team regulars in the future.
And let's not forget how you save us all so much time by labelling anyone on the other side of the discussion as 'delusional' instead of wasting time having an actual debate about it. The repetitive, meaningless arguments you create in EVERY feckING THREAD in the United forum are so much more rewarding for the rest of us who inhabit the place.
Biggest problems have been some defensive lapses and a midfield decimated by injuries.
Seriously agree with all of this. I just looked a thread discussing why our passing is often poor. Lots of interesting discussion.
@el3mel's contribution? "Our players are stupid."
It's as if he is actively working to make the forum a shitty place.
I agree mate. And just to add to your post, it all started with Woodward taking over from Gill and revamping everything and bringing in the likes of Butt and Murtough (just to name two) to work with a much bigger scouting network which looks like it's gonna pay dividends in the mid/longterm. Under Gill, things were looking so bad that people started questioning the point of the academy like you quite correctly pointed out.True. I remember people questioningly the purpose of the youth system sometime back becuase we hadn't seen a 'top player' for ages. I think it's great. Nothing like developing and promoting young footballers, and turning them into stars. And we're doing some strong work in that regard. Lots of talent once again in the youth teams /among the youth products. Lovely to see.
Nope, sorry but the argument still doesn't add up. The discussion of whether perceived progress is an important metric or mere results should be considered, is a fair one, although I think the latter is on weak footing. However, despite progress being of utmost importance (and I don't think it's happening under Ole), the SAF patience /time example isn't relevant anymore for reasons already mentioned a billion times. And the verdict on our current progress isn't unanimous at all. Many feel it hasn't happened.I certainly didn't say that. Are you arguing with the fantasy person in your head?
Seriously, there's a discussion to be had about whether perceived progress is important in judging a manager, or whether current results are the only standard. @sunama was saying he thinks it should only be current results. The Fergie example may or may not be hackneyed, but it is definitely relevant to that discussion.
Nothing in what I've just said implies that I think that we should "give every average manager 5 years because of that one time we struck gold." I'm not sure what is so hard to comprehend and why you insist on putting words in other people's mouths?
Here's a constructive suggestion. Why don't you engage with the actual discussion?