ti vu
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2015
- Messages
- 12,799
Even in the Mourinho first season, his team conceded under 30 goal in the league, and Mourinho's teams in his good years overall was well known for keeping low conceded goal stats , and great goal keeping job. His style is never about putting out fire, but weathering the storm.
Metric2017/18 2019/20 2020/21 Goals Conceded 28 36 44 Shots Conceded per game (whoscored) 11.5 10.3 11.3 xGA(fbref) 41.7 (5th) 37.4(3rd) 42.2 (4th) Pressures in final 3rd (fbref) 1265 (7th) 1361(10th) 1340 (5th) PPDA (understat) 10.25 (7th) 9.64 (6th) 10.95 (9th)
The thing is if we compare Mou's best season with the two full seasons of Ole, it's weird for anyone to say that the team wasn't doing well defensively under Ole. Sure there were terrible performances, but over a season, barring goals conceded (which was thanks to Dave's GOAT season), there is no underlying metric where that season was better than either of the full seasons under Ole.
THis season, no one's saying things didnt get bad, and he was sacked, but to say that the defending happened as the players wished, you'd assume that he signed Milan 2003 defence.
People need to get to a final script to blame something - you can't have "Look at our players decision making. All are idiots" and also go on with "individual brilliance". Both can't be true at the same time. Similarly, you can't have for a side finishing in top 4 in consecutive seasons both "built a horrible squad" and "No tactics only vibes". It just doesn't add up.
He fecked up this season, but blaming Ole for loss vs Boro, draws vs Burnley and Newcastle is idiotic. If you want to do that, then credit Ole for the wins post his sacking as well
During his time, he had chances to add 2 starting PL GKs. Spent huge sum on Maguire and AWB. Signed a decent back up LB in Telles. And in the most recent summer window recruited one established world class CB. Mourinho and LVG got shit on them for the CBs they brought in, yet they still create a defense in their vision out of them and what they inherited. Ole spent more money on defenders and even got a world class CB, then crying wolf about not able to defend properly. Milan 2003 defense would not happen if Ancelotti didn't know how to coach a defense. Why would Nesta, Stam, Cafu joined Milan if Milan was no better than their team. Lazio and Roma won Serie A not long ago with Nesta and Milan. Lazio wouldn't have the money to buy Stam if not for their successes.
Ole couldn't get 4th position at the end of 18-19 season with 66 points, yet in his first full season 66 points got him 3rd place. Mourinho first was mile off top 4 and still got 69 points, having to get CL qualification through EL triumph.
Getting second place last season was all good and sexy until the predictable reality check arrived this season. Without hindsight I mentioned Arsenal finished 2nd during Leicester triumph season, before stopping making top 4 altogether on few occasions, before the start of this season. Achieving on merit would build foundation for the future. Luck out due to circumstances is not sustainable. Having no style while selling ever changing snake oil style of place would eventually come back to bite hard on the ass.
One huge element of Ole previous 2 full seasons are football BCD. It's clear to see the points were being spreader out more to lower mid table teams during the height of COVID uncertainty.
Player can be silly tactically making numerous bad decisions during games, and still come up with plenty of moment of brilliance. Nani is a good example. Many of our current players fit into profile too in to lesser or similar extend: Rashford, Fred, Shaw, McTominay, Greenwood, Pogba... even Bruno.
Non-coaching manager that leaves no foundation, no style deserves the criticism for his mess of legacy.